For The Sake Of Our Children

Posted on Saturday, March 05 at 20:22 by Milton

-- I have been an environmental advocate for twenty years, and I've been disciplined during that period about being nonpartisan in my approach to this issue. The worst thing that can happen to the environment is if it becomes the province of a single political party. Most of the environmental leaders in our country agree with me. Five years ago, if you asked the leaders of the major environmental groups in America, What's the gravest threat to the global environment?, they would have given you a range of answers: overpopulation, habitat destruction, global warming. Today, they will all tell you one thing: it's George W. Bush. This is the worst environmental president that we have ever had. You simply cannot speak honestly about the environment in any context today without speaking critically about this president. If you go to the Natural Resources Defense Council's web site you will see over 400 major environmental rollbacks that have been promoted by this administration over the last three and half years. It is a concerted, deliberate attempt to eviscerate thirty years of environmental law. It is a stealth attack, one that's been hidden from the public.

We found, in 2003, a memo from Frank Luntz, the president's pollster, to the president saying that if you go through with the evisceration of America's environmental law, you are going to alienate not just Democrats but the Republican rank and file. Eighty-one percent in both parties want clean air, they want stronger environmental laws and they want them strictly enforced. Luntz said that to the president, and he said, if we do this we have to do a stealth attack. He recommended using Orwellian rhetoric to mask this radical agenda: They want to destroy the forest, they call it the Healthy Forest Act; they want to destroy the air, they call it the Clear Skies Act. Most insidiously, they have installed the worst, most irresponsible polluters in America, and the lobbyists from those companies, as the heads of virtually all the agencies and sub-secretariats and even Cabinet positions that regulate or oversee our environment. The head of the Forest Service is a timber industry lobbyist who is probably the most rapacious timber industry lobbyist in American history. The head of public lands is a mining industry lobbyist who believes that public lands are unconstitutional. The head of the Air Division at the EPA is a utility lobbyist who has represented the worst polluters in America for twenty years. The head of Superfund is a woman whose former job was advising companies how to evade Superfund. The second in command of EPA is a Monsanto lobbyist - these are not exceptions, these are the rules across the agencies. I think it's a good idea to bring business people into government, to bring that experience and expertise.

These individuals did not enter government service for the purpose of promoting the public interest, but in each of these cases, rather to subvert the very laws that they are now charged with enforcing. We are seeing the impacts of this already. This year, for the first year on record, the EPA announced that the dead zone in Lake Erie - you remember Lake Erie was declared dead prior to Earth Day 1970 - is growing. Our water in this country, according to EPA, is getting dirty for the first time since the Clean Water Act was passed.

This article was published in the Winter 2005 issue of EarthLight where you may read the rest of this essay. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 7, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:17 am
    I thought only Canadian sovereignty issues were to go on the front page...slow news day.

  2. Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:30 am
    Good article, makes some important points, who in Canada is behind our clean air/land/water acts and who determines use of public lands and sale of same?

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:04 pm
    "The head of public lands is a mining industry lobbyist who believes that public lands are unconstitutional."

    That is probably the biggest mistake our governments ever made: giving corporations ownership of our lands and resources. When only a few prosper from the raping of our environment there is something very wrong going on.

    ---
    "Yeah, well, [Mr. President] we used all five fingers because that's the way our mittens are made." Antonia Zerbisias

  4. Sun Mar 06, 2005 11:44 pm
    <p>Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the host of a show on Air America Radio. He will be on this evening sometime. The show is called Ring of Fire. <p>I warn you this radio station is addictive, because it makes you laugh, and keeps you very entertained. They do such a good job at debunking the right wing lies. They often debunk O'Rielly. Apparently this station is heard by close to 50% of the American population. Not sure how accurate that is. <p><a href="http://www.airamericaradio.com/"><b>www.airamericaradio.com</b></a>

  5. Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:34 am
    Airborne pollution doesn't stop and wait for the border guard.

  6. Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:01 am
    An important issue, but it doesn't have anything to do with north american economic integration or Canadian political sovereignty.

  7. Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:59 am
    Environmental issues not a matter of Canadian
    sovereignty? Really? Think again!
    Where will the US get clean water once they have
    thrashed theirs? Not a matter of sovereignty? Think
    again!

    Canada has been pushed to the right by the US,
    certainly not by Canadians. Not a matter of sovereignty?
    Think again.

    Where the US leads, Canada follows. In this case
    straight to extinction! There, for sure sovereignty doesn't
    matter!

  8. Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:46 am
    yeah it's a nightmare all right. PLUS if you were to see what i've got for a spouse, the future is the mother of all nightmares.

  9. Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:27 am
    We are living today in a Liberal nightmare, a world where, because somebody gave money to a Liberal Politician, our children are brought into a world where the air is too poisonous for them to breathe.

    Where the Liberals could have shut down the “dirty coal” fired factories and generating stations in Ontario years ago, or at least required the use of friendlier clean coal, instead they turned a blind eye. Ontario still uses "dirty coal"

    We are living today in a Liberal nightmare, a world where, because somebody gave money to a Liberal Politician, our police die due to lack of support and training, where the Liberals could have spent the billions they are spending on keeping an eye on legal gun owners through gun control only of legal owners, ignoring known violent offenders, and saying publicly that there is no more money for extra RCMP for rural areas, that there is no more money to equip our police with proper life safety vests and other protection equipment.

    When it comes to protection of our police, the Liberals turn a blind eye.

    We are living today in a Liberal nightmare, a world where, because somebody gave money to a Liberal Politician, Billions are spent to force Chinese, German, Russian, Japanese, and all other ethnic students to learn French in order to work for the Federal Government or attend Military Schools or work abroad in Canadian Embassies. One of the funniest situations I ran across in some embassies and consulates is trying to converse with a Canadian official who only spoke French, in a country where no French was spoken except in the Canadian access building. (It was an American tourist who translated)

    When it comes to provide services for those Canadians who prefer not to learn French, the Liberals turn a blind eye.

    We are living today in a Liberal nightmare, a world where, because somebody gave money to a Liberal Politician, children between the ages of 11 and 14 are being used as mules, drug dealers, car thieves, gang enforcers and almost all other crimes imaginable because judges are given instructions by the Liberal Government to minimize enforcement of any regulations against minors.

    When our seniors, women and children, our public cannot walk our streets in safety, the Liberals turn a blind eye.

    We are living today in a Liberal nightmare, a world where, because somebody gave money to a Liberal Politician, advertising executives make millions for their families, ex bureaucrats get forgiveness on million dollar tax evasions, but let a college student working in bars not claim a hundred dollars in tips for the year, let a mom not claim financial assistance from her family for her final years in a care home, the Liberals through Revenue Canada will smash you big time. (Anyone remember Radwanski’s $540,000 tax debt forgiveness because he was a Liberal appointee?)

    When they are Liberal thieves, Revenue Canada is required to turn a blind eye.




    ---
    Politicians are like diapers, they need to be changed regularly, and for the same reason.

  10. Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:01 am
    SO you oppose learning French? Nobody is forcing them to work for the government.

  11. Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:13 am
    Jeez, it's not *that* bad. Sure, there are problems, but wow, there are worse
    governments around.

  12. Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:28 am
    You are right, you do not have to work for the government, but you still do not see the enormous waste of taxpayers dollars that go into mandatory french language training programs for Federal civil servants who never will even get the opportunity to use that particular skill, especially when they train for work in countries or in international research where no french is spoken.

    There are hundreds if not thousands, of extremely well qualified personnel being denied jobs, or who alternately, refuse jobs in the Federal Service who have no interest in learning french.

  13. Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:47 pm
    I think anyone reading this post should be a little less concerned with George Bush and direct their attention to Paul Martin and Canadians in general. Stats Canada produced a report that was aired on C.T.V that revealed that Canadians remain amoung the biggest polluters in the industrialized world. Each Canadian produced roughly 18.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide, one of the highest levels in the world...this was 30% higher than the average for member nations of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Developement.
    Canadians produce more garbage per person than just about any country in the world. The average person in Ontario generates a whole tonne of trash per year.
    The OECD reported that out of twenty-five enviromental indicators in ten categories- air,water,energy,biodiversity,waste, climate change,ozone depletion,agriculture and miscellaneous Canada's ranking is a dismal 28th out of 29 nations.
    Canada produces more nuclear waste every year per capita than any other OECD nation.
    In Canada, nuclear waste has grown by 76% since 1982.
    Canadians are 24th out of 27 nations in per capita hazerdous waste
    Canadians ranked 27 out of 29 OECD nations in per capita greenhouse gases.
    Need I continue...ViveleCanada should start looking for dirty laundry where it sits...in your house!

  14. Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:40 pm
    I quite agree with the above, this has been verified by several sources. That the US has problems is certain, but keep in mind there are typically stricter environmental restrictions at the state and county levels, depending where you are of course.

    I was looking for a link I just saw this morning but now it's buried somewhere amongst thousands of 'favourites', but in essence it concerned the trading of pollution credits (not Kyoto related) but the program said it has to keep in mind Canada's far worse environmental regulations and reporting. This is another example of the propaganda system making people think Canada is some kind of environmental leader when we are far far behind. The US has the bad excuse of having a large population, we have a comparitively small population which, per capita, wreaks far more damage on the environment.

    This, of course, has plenty to do with the liberal government, but anybody who thinks a conservative, or even NDP government will 'save the day' is dreaming (IMHO). They ALL talk the talk, then stumble the walk. Notice how the 'one tonne challenge' doesn't make a single environmental regulation on polluters, yet wants the public to 'take up the slack'.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news