But with Canadian forces daily facing catastrophic injury and death in a mission most Canadians just do not understand, we will not find our way out of the Afghanistan quagmire unless we get back to the fundamentals of modern complex peace operations.
The insistence of the international community on a peace process as the starting point for any post-conflict peacekeeping effort is a very pragmatic one. The aim is not to go to war with the parties — however well-armed the international force may be — but to help them build the democratic institutions and processes that will enable them to manage societal conflicts in a non-violent way. A robust force can deter violations of the peace agreement, and effectively address them when they occur and thus build confidence in the peace process.
But this presumes that all or most of the key players want peace more than war, so that individual spoilers can be effectively isolated and dealt with, under the Chapter VII mandate.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060307.wafghanmason0307/BNStory/Afghanistan/
Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

The purpose is to establish permanent military bases - US bases - along the route of the oil pipeline they want to build from Turkmenistan to the Arabian Sea.
Keeping Afg UNSTABLE will promote this purpose. That's what we're there for.
If Afg ever became democratic (horror of horrors!) it might just tell the US to pack up its bases, and assert control over its own resources.
The purpose is to establish permanent military bases - US bases - along the route of the oil pipeline they want to build from Turkmenistan to the Arabian Sea.
Keeping Afg UNSTABLE will promote this purpose. That's what we're there for.
If Afg ever became democratic (horror of horrors!) it might just tell the US to pack up its bases, and assert control over its own resources.
much like any of the actions the AMERIKANS have used to get what they want/need
shah of iran,norieaga,saddam all ex puppets,whose next