U.S. Senate Votes To Fully Back U.N. Peacekeeping

Posted on Sunday, June 25 at 11:50 by jensonj
Congress passed a law in 1994 that limited U.S. payments to 25 percent of the U.N. peacekeeping budget, even though the U.N. General Assembly, which apportions payments based on a country's wealth, had said Washington should pay 31 percent. Congress temporarily raised that to 27 percent starting in 2001 to comply with an agreement to pay arrears negotiated by Richard Holbrooke, former U.S. ambassador the United Nations. That congressional authorization has expired. "At a time when U.N. peacekeeping operations around the world are having a positive effect on countless lives -- from Haiti to Democratic Republic of the Congo, to Kosovo -- we must not shortchange these critical missions," Biden, who pushed the measure, said in a statement. Washington is pressing for U.N. financial reforms, Biden added, so "we certainly should not fall deeper into arrears on our obligations." The House of Representatives has not yet acted on a measure to adjust peacekeeping costs. The United Nations currently has 15 peacekeeping mission with nearly 75,000 troops and police plus another 12,000 civilians. The largest operation is in the Congo with 17,000 troops and police followed by Liberia with 15,800 and southern Sudan with some 9,300. The cost over the last year, ending in June, was $4.9 billion. http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-06-23T214410Z_01_N23448456_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-UN-CONGRESS-PEACEKEEPING-COL.XML&archived=False [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 26, 2006]

Note: http://ca.today.reuters...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options





You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news