Our Self-Inflicted Burden

Posted on Wednesday, August 18 at 12:08 by Reverend Blair

We like to stand on our human rights record here in Canada, and it is a record that’s better than the records of most countries on this planet. We have a skeleton or two in our national closet, though. Our treatment of our native peoples is one of those skeletons. It is a skeleton you’ll find in many closets...the way indigenous people have been treated has been a travesty for a very long time.

In this age when we purport to be fighting genocide, the developed world has yet to come to terms with the fact that a large part of the way we became “the developed world” was by subjugating and abusing indigenous people whenever we found them. Not only haven’t we come to terms with what we did, we’ve never even acknowledged it to any real extent.

In Canada, National Aboriginal Day came and went with barely a mention. We celebrate the birthday of long-dead Queen Victoria, but we do little to officially recognise the contribution our native people made in the formation of this country. On July 1 we mark Canada Day, but among the fireworks and speeches there is only cursory attention paid to the people we subjugated while building this country.

In the United States they celebrate Colombus Day. It marks the onset of what was likely the biggest genocide in human history, yet is not a day of remembrance for those who suffered but a celebration of the conquest. They celebrate Independence Day and there is much talk at that time about their founding fathers, but rarely do you hear a high-level politician give more than a passing mention of the people who were the first Americans.

Australia has Australia Day and although the country instituted Sorry Day in 1998 and has made at least some effort to reconcile the devastating impact that Britain’s colonization of Australia had on the indigenous people there, the reality of that devastation still exists and has a massive daily impact on aboriginal people there.

Those are just the three groups of indigenous peoples most likely to be recognised by North Americans. There are indigenous people scattered across the plant though not just in the Americas and Australia, and even among the groups we readily recognise we fail to acknowledge that they are not a single cohesive people, but many nations with different cultures and customs. According to the definition the UN uses, written by José Martínez-Cobo, the Special Rapporteur to the Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, "Indigenous communities, peoples and nations are those which having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of societies now prevailing in those territories, or parts of them. They form at present non-dominant sectors of society and are determined to preserve, develop, and transmit to future generations their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity, as the basis of their continued existence as peoples, in accordance with their own cultural patterns, social institutions and legal systems." The UN further uses the International Labour Organisation’s definition from Convention 169, “a. tribal peoples in independent countries whose social, cultural and economic conditions distinguish them from other sections of the national community, and whose status is regulated wholly or partially by their own customs or traditions or by special laws or regulations; b. peoples in independent countries who are regarded as indigenous on account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country belongs, at the time of conquest or colonization or the establishment of present state boundaries and who, irrespective of their legal status, retain some or all of their own social, economic, cultural and political institutions.”

Indigenous peoples are, by definition, those who have had their cultures, religions, and laws undermined by people who came to their lands much later. There are about 5000 groups of indigenous peoples for a total population of 250-300 million individuals. They range from small tribes, many nearing extinction, many that have chosen to remain isolated; to fair-sized minorities, often made up of many subgroups.

In 1993 the United Nations declared that the decade from 1995 to 2004 would be the decade of the International Decade of the World's Indigenous People. That decade is now passed and while there have been some improvements, the situation is far from satisfactory. Canada still has poor records in the way our indigenous people are dealt with. The slightest talk of land claims brings out the vitriol of those who would give nothing to our aboriginal populations regardless of longstanding treaties that clearly leave Canada indebted to those populations.

Ownership and control of land is not a problem restricted to Canada. In Indonesia the Malay and Sakai people have had vast tracts of their lands seized. This land is now owned by the state, the equivalent of our Canadian Crown land, and was taken for forestry in an illegal seizure. The land was seized for logging.

According to Human Rights Watch, "Intimidation, harassment and violent attacks against indigenous communities are frequent occurrences in countries including Honduras, Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico and Venezuela," In Colombia, as the war on drugs morphs evermore into the war for oil, it is the indigenous people who suffer the most. In Venezuela the Pemon community has suffered threats and violence for opposing an electricity supply project on their lands. In Brazil the violence and threats hinge on the designation of land that belong to the indigenous communities.

In most cases the human rights of indigenous peoples, including land rights, are infringed upon not because inherent prejudice against race or religion, although those certainly exist and are often used as tools, but because of greed. Mineral rights, oil rights, logging rights, hydro-electric dams, farms and plantations and the placement of related infrastructure are why the infringements on land and rights continue.

After a decade of actively working to solve the plight of indigenous people not much progress has been made. In some cases the situation has actually worsened. Until it is recognised that the wealth of the countries and corporations that caused the problems in the first place are the same countries and corporations that continue to exacerbate the problem and that is acted upon, lasting solutions cannot be reached.

As long as companies like Enron, Halliburton, and Shell are able to exert pressure on local governments through their own governments and the policies of agencies such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, even directly addressing the issues surrounding the subjugation of indigenous peoples is difficult in international forums.

In Canada the industrial use of Crown lands has traditionally been done without settling land claims first. In Manitoba(pdf file) this has led to ongoing legal challenges and caused strife among native communities. Similar issues have been raised from the Maritimes to British Columbia and north into the three territories. The resources and immediate issues change, in Canada and around the world, but the larger issue never does.

Canada, if it were to seriously begin to address native issues, could become a leader on the issue of indigenous people’s rights. If South Africa could use Canada as a guiding influence for apartheid in South Africa, there is no reason why Canada cannot be a guiding influence in working towards solving the situation indigenous people all over the planet find themselves in. All we have to do is find a way to make our first nations into equal members of our own society and others will have a map to follow.

There’s a new dimension to the term white man’s burden, one that we need to pay particular attention to if we have an intention of making this world a better place. There is need for the nations of the world who thought they could dominate other cultures to take up a new burden...working with indigenous peoples to correct the problems that the old idea of the white man’s burden caused. To do that we must first toss out the old notions of profit being the only worthwhile outcome.

It is time to learn the right lessons instead of trying to teach the wrong ones.

--- Reverend Blair was raised in Saskatchewan and currently lives in Winnipeg, Manitoba. He comes from a long line of social activists and cried on Tommy Douglas before his first birthday. His column appears biweekly on Vive le Canada.



Note: National Aboriginal Day Colombus Day. Australia Day Sorry Day definition International Labour O... International Decade of... Malay and Sakai Enron Shell Canada Manitoba

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:14 am
    I was born and raised not far from you. In North Dakota not far from the Canadian line. I grew up white, totally ignoant of Indians. Tragic circumstances thrust me in the position I am today--right in the midst of the Lakotas, and together we are making a last stand for the Lakota civilization before it becomes extinct. O, there will still be Indians, but they will know nothing of their customs, language, or traditions. It's being brainwashed out of them, with the help of the dollar flung at half-breed officials who run the show. The greatest destruction comes from Christianity, public schools, and the Tribal government and BIA.

  2. Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:33 am
    Similar things are happening all over the world, Janis. It is the legacy left to the world by nineteenth century colonialism. That we are really only starting to think about dealing with it now is a bad joke.

  3. Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:01 pm
    Yes, so sad, but it does show just how important heritage and culture are to people! And as much as we here think it omni-important to preserve and build Canada, we surely cannot deny this to aboriginal peoples, especially when we beat our chests proclaiming our multi-culturalism.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  4. by avatar Zaphod
    Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:41 pm
    Look people. The world changes. People have to change with it: adapt or perish. The past is history. Best to forget it and look to the future and stop the victim mentality.

  5. Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:46 pm
    Actually, the past is the future, unless we learn from it we are destined to repeat it! So we ought not forget the past, not ever, but we can chose to do things differently now and in the future; like not oppressing people, not driving them into poverty, not creating slave like situations. We can do better, we have the skills, do we have the will, where there is a will there is a way!

    Ah yes the cliche post, but all are true.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  6. Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:46 pm
    I agree, we must go forward, but we cannot until the injustices of the past or present are dealt with. Some aboriginals in Canada have gone forward, knowing that they can never return to the life they had before Europeans came, but that`s because they were lucky enough to be in a position to do so. But many aboriginals are still stuck between the two worlds; many are still feeling the sting of residential schools, abuse, and supressed culture. Many aboriginals still live on reserves with no running water or sewage, no job prospects, and little hope for the future. And with events like Oka and Ipperwash still so recent, not to mention Saskatoon police taking aboriginals out to the city edge on cold winter nights to freeze, well, this only re-inforces resentment and feelings of hate. Once again, i feel that Canada must return to nation building and in doing so promote social and economic justice for all.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:23 am
    What's with this 'we' stuff. My parents came from Europe in the fifties and i was born in Canada. My parents never mentioned that they had to kill a bunch of Indians and i've never done so myself - so put it this way> I am NOT responsible for the poor Indians and don't think Canadian governments should be spending ten billion dollars a year to support feudal 'self-governments', it's patronizing, racist, supports sexism and keeps aboriginals in a perpetually miserable state. The 'Natives' should be given the same citizenship rights and responsibilities as every other Canadian. Give them legal ownership of their reserve lands and let them sell it or do whatever they please, but 'keeping' them as supplicants is only killing them, that's too obvious.

  8. Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:24 am
    You should look into the treaties that your government signed and the way we've lived up to them, anon.

    This is a problem that we've created as the dominant culture, and beginning your Canadian heritage in the last generation or so does not excuse you...you have the same government as the rest of us and the problem is global, not just national.

    The point of the article is not that we should continue the paternalism that got us here anyway...the point is that we should work with indigenous people (and Canada is not the only country that needs to do this) to solve the problems so that we all can be stronger and better.

    Denying responsibility and refusing to become engaged just perpetuates the problems.

  9. by michou
    Sat Aug 21, 2004 1:27 pm
    It is capitalistic greed which conquered and enslaved indigenous and minority communities the world over. For those who think this is all old history, they should take a good look to the present for examples on how men’s greed is still alive and brutal. America’s imperial thrust into the Middle East is one of them.<p> Contrary to the past, subjugation by might will not meet its previous success for two reasons, education and democracy. As the world becomes better informed and educated, minorities and those left to their misery are arising to be counted and are refusing to be submitted. Poor Venezualans showed up in great numbers and by re-selecting Chavez, opted for redistribution of wealth. Minorities the world over are fighting for their rights. Most are doing it by democratic means, some are given no choice but to fight for them, as is the case for Iraqis. The solution may lie in respecting what indigenous and minority democratically decide for themselves. Easier said than done.

  10. by JimmyD
    Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:46 pm
    1. I have to agree with you Rverend Blair. If we were looking back at our history we would realize that we have not indeed lived up to our obligations to the First Nations people. Others have said that we move on and that history changes.

    2. Well, to me it is that mentality that has given Canada many of it's problems. For example, The now Ultra Conservatives but the then alliance and before that reform party have stated as a part of their dogma that all provinces are the same and should be treated as such. What they forgot about was that each province was brought into confederation under different terms. So if we look back in history we were never the same if we were, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland would have the right to the money produced from their resources the same as Alberta. Quebec when they joined confederation was given the right to their own customs, religion, education, language etc as outlined in the BNA. So here we are now trying to tell them that they are the same as other provinces but they and the other provinces are not the same, we never were accept in the minds of some.

    3. It must also be understood that yes indeed the English crown were the ones that negotiated the treaties with the first nations. But the Canadian Government as a part of the creation of Canada accepted these obligations as part of the terms of Confederation. It should also be noted that First Nations peoples fought in the War of 1812, WWI,WW2, and Korea and did not receive the same benefits as other Veterans. We are working at trying to right this wrong, all I can say is thank heavens that not all people did not have the same attitude as Anon. It is easy to have this sort of attitude when you are in the drivers seat but put them in the back seat and you would not be able to hear yourself think with all of the calmity that would take place.

    4. In the War of 1812 the First Nations were promised a home land for having supported the British defending Canada against the Americans. If it hadn't been for the First Nations I fear to say that we would probably be part of the American Republic today. The British at the time did not have the funding to send more troops and was looking at supporting the war against France.

    5. So in conclusion, we can learn a lot from our history. I only hope that the next generation of leaders that are in school now take the opportunity to learn everything about Canadian history as they can. A lot of the troubling issues we are facing today have come from our historical formation. It would also do Canadian citizen well to delve into the history books and find out about how we developed as a country and what we agreed to and what we need to do in the future. A little introduction of history in the National Discussion would certainly give the present debates some context.

  11. Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:59 am
    Jimmyd, great post, the only problem with looking at our history books, is many are not written by Canadians; if I remember correctly, Mel Hurtig's book the Vanishing Country pointed out a Canadian history book with a picture of George Washington or another president on the front, how telling is that???

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  12. Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:02 pm
    I think all of your enlightened comments are going to help lead the way to a better world for all of us. When one looks at the atrocities of Abu Ghraib, and looks at the U.S. feverishly trying to assure the world that this is just a little slip up rather than standard procedure, I think it would do us all good to very carefully revisit the past so that we can correct the sins of the present. What are we to say to all those Iraqis who have suffered so much? All so that the oil men can have it all, and that the Euro doesn't replace the dollar. We have a joke on the Reservation that Iraq is becoming the next Reservation.

  13. Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:05 am
    How would you like to be robbed of your identity, and told that it is good for you? If you cannot totally destroy a people, then destroy their culture in "their own best interest". Just as you have 6 essential needs to keep living as a human being, so does a civilization have 6 essential needs for its survival, which are: language, economy, government, morality, religion, and means of passing on the knowledge. Every civilization has these, but obviously, they are are the same. Native civilization is 180 degrees different from Western in all 6 areas. To destroy even one, may destroy the civilization. Yes, people will be walking around with brown skin, but will have lost their identity.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news