On Bended Knee

Posted on Tuesday, August 02 at 13:19 by FootPrints
Ottawa understands that Canada isn’t the US and that what sells in the US doesn’t sell here. So, for example, officially Canada didn’t go to war with Iraq (but we sent commandos to help) and officially we didn’t ratify the missile defense treaty (but hey, anything you want except the piece of paper), and we don’t extradite our own citizens like Arar to be tortured by other countries (but if you want us to help you extradite him, that’s ok, just seize him outside Canada so we can pretend we weren’t involved). When the US puts someone on their immigration ban list, such as Dr. Salam Ismael, who was in Fallujah right after the US siege, we’re happy to ban him from our country for them (we also held up a noted GM Foods expert a while back – since for some reason we seem to be shilling for GM foods.) US customs has access to Canadian citizen’s tax records, among other things (and if you don’t think that means that absolutely everyone in the US government has access to them you are touchingly… naïve.) And if you hate the Patriot Act, well the Canadian government can hold you without trial and without telling anyone why for a hell of a long time too. They usually do so when the US tells CSIS to lock someone up. Now Canada’s population is one tenth the size of the US’s. The vast majority of our trade is with the US. Our army is diminutive. And the US isn’t exactly run by rational actors these days. So perhaps Martin and company feel that appeasement is the way to go – buy the US off by allowing it to torture a Canadian citizen, turning back US military refugree claimants, supporting its stance on GM foods and helping cover up what is happening in Iraq in whatever small ways they can. The mid-term story here is that we’ve got a problem with the US which goes beyond any of the things above. Trade. Canada’s trade is primarily with the US. Martin knows (because Martin is a smart man about these things) that we have to wean ourselves off that. He knows that the Big Three are in trouble and that the Golden Horseshoe, the Canadian heartland, is a subsidiary of Detroit (in fact, it is Detroit now). He knows that Alberta ships most of its oil and natural gas to the US. He knows that most of our wood products go to the US. He knows that while our economy is very different from the US economy, it is nonetheless very dependent on the US. He knows that we have benefited greatly from the past few years, as one of the three main countries which have gained the elephant’s share of outsourcing (not offshoring, that’s mostly gone to China.) No one in the US respects a weakling nation. It’s time to stop acting like one. http://www.la-mancha.net/archives/000955.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on August 3, 2005]

Note: http://www.la-mancha.ne...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:10 pm
    Editor's comment: There is a new listing in the calendar for a protest this Saturday in Vancouver.

    If you know of any more, let me know and I'll add them too.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  2. Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:59 pm
    Footprints,absolutely excellent post! This should be the wake-up call we needed, collectively speaking. But we are going to have to make some noise, because many Canadians don't see the connection to our sovereignty, they see it as a pot issue. Which it is not!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:22 am
    <p>Out of curiosity, I tried to find a Canadian offence for which Emery could be charged. The <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-38.8/">Controlled Drugs and Substances Act of 1996</a> seems to be relevant — namely, the <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-38.8/37301.html#section-6">section on importing and exporting</a>, since viable cannabis seed is <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-38.8/37475.html#rid-37528">a substance on Schedule II. of the Act</a>.</p> <p>Unsurprisingly, the <a href="http://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1961_en.pdf">1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs</a>, of which both Canada and the USA are signatories, excludes cannabis seeds from the list of narcotics; but what is more interesting for signatories is that should cannabis be legalised in a signatory country, then government agency/-ies must be established by that country to regulate the production and sale of cannabis, and the entire national cannabis crop must be sold to said agency/ies!</p> <p>So — would everyone here like to see all extradition treaties with the USA brought to an end, to avoid repeat performances?</p><p>---<br>I am willing to love all mankind, except an American…<br />
    <br />
    — Samuel Johnson, LL.D.: 15th April 1778<br />

  4. Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:08 am
    So if someone were mailing crack cocaine to Canadians from Australia, that's if crack cocaine was believed to be 'medicinal' in Australia, that would be fine with these guys? Get real, he's a drug dealer.

  5. Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:20 am
    I have permanent frontal lobe damage.
    Persons such as yourself make me homicidal.
    This is a symptom of my injury.
    Marijuana keeps my moods under control.
    Crack would make them worse.
    You need to learn the difference between shit and shinola,
    Yankee boy.
    It may be saving your life.

  6. Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:22 am
    One must surely be on crack to compare crack to pot, let alone seeds!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:05 am
    Dave, perhaps you point out the problem with the
    current US administration -- or maybe the issue is just
    living on the profits of crack.

  8. by RPW
    Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:08 am
    Perhaps if the JTF2 visited the US.......? Say, to recover the cash that California owes BC for hydro power....?<br />
    <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/jtf2.html">http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/jtf2.html</a><p>---<br>RickW

  9. Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:16 pm
    If the substance were legal in the exporting country, the importer would be liable, not the exporter. You try to bring back a pair of endangered-lizard-skin boots, the guy who sold them to you isn't the one getting arrested at the airport.

    Heck, we export all kinds of stuff--asbestos, pesticides, chemicals, which *are* illegal to sell here. I don't see these companies being held liable for breaking domestic law by selling a prohibited substance!

  10. Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:40 am
    Hey no kidding! Lets get the Enron executives sent to Canada to face justice. let us lock them away for life! What is good for the canadian goose is good for the yankee gander.

  11. Thu Aug 04, 2005 1:33 am
    a lawyers point of view

    Back in the USSR

    | | | Inbox


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Attachment : image5.jpg (0.07 MB), image6.jpg (0.07 MB), image7.jpg (0.08 MB)

    Welcome back to the US/SR
    Yessir Yessir Three Bags Full, Sir
    Here we are again, Sir, Mr Justice Dohm
    Who signed the Warrant to search Glen Clark?
    Who sits on the Legislature Seizure Warrants?
    Who appoints himself to "sensitive" government cases?
    Who are you? Who? Who?

    Professor Andrew Coyne of Carleton University wrote in today's Victoria Times an article headlined: "Premiers should know their place in the world". Right on, Ralph Klein.

    Here's one for the books. B.C. can legitimize pot decriminalize pot in a heartbeat. All it takes is a Bill introduced in the Legislature. B.C. as a colony entered into a deal - like a poker game, when it agreed to join other Sovereign Provinces and sit at the table. So. B.C. Legislature does what Larry Campbell, newly appointed Senator said to do, "decriminalize pot". Why?

    Well, first you never had the power, authority or jurisdiction to make pot crime laws in the first place, Parliament! You never got that power from the British North America Act, 1867, you made that decision based on no law. Arbitrarily deciding to include a herb, a medicinal herb, a green growing plant, a seed bearing herb, deciding to do to it what you decided to do to witches in Salem and others during the Inquisitions - burn the pot plants, cut them down, cleave them asunder, destroy them altogether... and we hear the echo of Thomas Jefferson's words in his 1736 Notes on Virginia where he says to his cronies, that is the same thing you need to do to kill any remembrance of native, american, sioux, aboriginal ways... Jefferson proclaimed the same vehement diatribe against Totems and Cairns and Standing Rocks and Standing People and Medicine Circles and Kivas and Long Houses and Ghost Dances and SunDances... and... he only echoed the words of Horace who wrote in Latin Rome around 60 A.D., he too spoke out against Totem Pole Art... just like The Psalmist who wrote in Psalm 74:5 about a man skilled in carving, who carved on a tree some songs... some lyrics... some tunes... like a dj on a hill all alone... until some others came with their axes and hammers to cut it down... to destroy it... to kill it... to burn it... just like they do to pot plants... seed bearing herbs... medicine for multiple sclerosis, colitis, cancer... food, butter, clothing... and adobe - like bricks to make houses.

    People in Alberta facing criminal charges for pot crimes can Petition Ralph Klein to force him by a mandamus Order, to introduce legislation decriminalizing pot in the Alberta legislature, based on the Sovereign power, exclusive power given Provinces under the BNA Act, 1867, over property and civil rights. He took an Oath - an Oath of Office - placed his hand on a Bible and swore to uphold the Law. The Law based on 2000 year old Judeao/Islamic/Catholic/Protestant theology teachings, culminating in the Theocratic Charter of Rights and Freedoms introduced in 1982: A document clearly indicating its THEOLOGICAL ORIGINS AND ESSENCE.

    That CHARTER begins with the words: Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the rule of law... That Preamble must not be glossed over. No. For it is in the Preamble to the British North America Act, 1867, that the Supreme Court of Canada says, that is where it gets its inherent jurisdiction as a Court, where Judges get their "independence" from the other two branches of government, the Preamble is where Judges can claim 'impartiality'.

    So. Canada is founded on principles that recognize... a Deity. A deity called "God". The word "God" to a dyslexic looks like "Dog". Dogs are man's best friend. More loyalty in a wagging dog tail than in most human handshakes, they say. So. We have Canada and stories of how Canada is "going to the dogs". People are arguing about custody of dogs in divorce cases. Dogs. People sure like dogs. So. Canada is based on, is founded on principles that recognize, i.e. beliefs that hold to a tenet of faith, "Canada believes God exists", the Charter says so.

    Some look at the world as if somehow somebody is in control. Somebody at the levers, making things happen according to an agenda. A ghost in the machine, or what some call "the grey eminence" or "eminence front".

    Why this is is clear to see
    Canada is a theocracy
    Complete with its own Charter Church
    Just read R. v. Schedel 2003 364.
    To see how our Court of Appeal would deal
    with a case where people who grew a seed yielding
    herb... it would let them go free.

    So should any Court with eyes to see and ears to hear.

    'd'



    ---

    Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boy.
    -Parliament of Whores

  12. Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:07 am
    Crack cocaine? Hmmm that wounderous cash cow brought to your children by the Cocaine Importing Agency C.I.A. to Y'all.<br />
    "For decades, the CIA, the Pentagon, and secret organizations like Oliver North's Enterprise have been supporting and protecting the world's biggest drug dealers.... The Contras and some of their Central American allies ... have been documented by DEA as supplying ... at least 50 percent of our national cocaine consumption. They were the main conduit to the United States for Colombian cocaine during the 1980's. The rest of the drug supply ... came from other CIA-supported groups, such as DFS (the Mexican CIA) ... other groups and/or individuals like Manual Noriega." (Ex-DEA agent Michael Levine: The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic)<br />
    <br />
    "In my 30-year history in the Drug Enforcement Administration and related agencies, the major targets of my investigations almost invariably turned out to be working for the CIA." --Dennis Dayle, former chief of an elite DEA enforcement unit. FROM: Peter Dale Scott & Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America, Berkeley: U. of CA Press, 1991, pp. x-xi.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://ciadrugs.homestead.com/files/index.html">http://ciadrugs.homestead.com/files/index.html</a><p>---<br><br />
    Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boy. <br />
    -Parliament of Whores

  13. by RPW
    Thu Aug 04, 2005 1:39 pm
    <blockquote> More loyalty in a wagging dog tail than in most human handshakes</blockquote> <p>Was not the handshake a defensive mechanism used when meeting strangers?</p> Kind of describes just about all of human history..........<p>---<br>RickW

  14. Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:42 am
    <blockquote>… and we hear the echo of Thomas Jefferson’s words in his 1736 <i>Notes on Virginia</i> where he says to his cronies, that is the same thing you need to do to kill any remembrance of native, american, sioux, aboriginal ways… Jefferson proclaimed the same vehement diatribe against Totems and Cairns and Standing Rocks and Standing People and Medicine Circles and Kivas and Long Houses and Ghost Dances and SunDances …</blockquote> <p>Jefferson was born in 1738. His <i>Notes</i> were published in 1787. They can be read on Yale’s Avalon Project site, <a href="http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/jeffvir.htm">here</a>. The closest thing that I could find to the “vehement diatribe” described above was</p> <blockquote>I know of no such thing existing as an Indian monument: for I would not honour with that name arrow points, stone hatchets, stone pipes, and half-shapen images. Of labour on the large scale, I think there is no remain as respectable as would be a common ditch for the draining of lands: unless indeed it be the Barrows, of which many are to be found all over this country.</blockquote> <p>which begins the eighth paragraph of the answer to Query XI. I’d suggest reading the remainder of the answer to Query XI. to see just how vehement that diatribe actually is.</p><p>---<br>I am willing to love all mankind, except an American…<br />
    <br />
    — Samuel Johnson, LL.D.: 15th April 1778<br />



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news