Living Under Fascism
A sermon on Fascism, by minister Davidson Loehr, November 7, 2004
First Unitarian Universalist Church of Austin
4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756
512-452-6168
www.austinuu.org
You may wonder why anyone would try to use the word "fascism" in a serious discussion of where America is today. It sounds like cheap name-calling, or melodramatic allusion to a slew of old war movies. But I am serious. I don't mean it as name-calling at all. I mean to persuade you that the style of governing into which America has slid is most accurately described as fascism, and that the necessary implications of this fact are rightly regarded as terrifying. That's what I am about here. And even if I don't persuade you, I hope to raise the level of your thinking about who and where we are now, to add some nuance and perhaps some useful insights.
The word comes from the Latin word "Fasces," denoting a bundle of sticks tied together. The individual sticks represented citizens, and the bundle represented the state. The message of this metaphor was that it was the bundle that was significant, not the individual sticks. If it sounds un-American, it's worth knowing that the Roman Fasces appear on the wall behind the Speaker's podium in the chamber of the US House of Representatives.
http://www.yuricareport.com/PoliticalAnalysis/LivingUnderFascism.html
---
Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...
Anakin Skywalker will fall and the Empire will rise May 2005.
There is nothing democratic about the US government. They are, in fact, officially, a representative republic. So, at best, the US government could be called Representative because it allows atleast some groups of people impose their vision in government, but it is far from being a democracy.
Personally, I would use terms like Authoritarian, Totalitiarian, or Despotic to describe the bush admin.
"What is Canada -- a people's republic?"
Being more social than the US doesn't make us like Communist China. So stop tossing around these euphemisms. I would've thought someone who despises socialism in all its forms to be happy to live in a constitutional monarchy...
Although, I am mistaken by describing the US as a representative republic (the definitions keep changing). According to the CIA, the US is (administratively) a constitution-based federal republic with (historically) democratic traditions.
As well, part of this confusion stems from the fact that the same person is both head of government and head of state in the US.
So, I will clarify that Canada (historically) is a constitutional monarchy and (adminstratively) a confederation with a bicameral parliamentary democracy.
That fact is that the will of the people has little to do with deciding government policy, especially in the US. You can argue terminology all you want, but you can't dismiss the fact that it is the US government deciding what policies americans are to support rather than the other way around. This is called manufacturing consent. They have done this mainly by exaggerating threats posed by terrorism and exploiting Americans fears of being attacked. This is how they've been able to skirt around Due Process, to justify indefinite imprisonment, and perform search and seizures without warrant.... do you really believe that every person being held in Gitmo are fanatical suicide bombers? Not a single one has been charged with a crime. I could go on, but why don't you try to explain to me what makes the US so democratic as opposed to fascist?
Not fascism exactly, but a close substitute like their old pal - and mentor Pinochet.
Democracy ain't winning that's for sure. y'see a bunch of old greeks sitting around chewing the fat maybe one every 3000 years, and won't again for 'nuther 2980.