South America Moves Left

Posted on Monday, May 22 at 12:07 by RPW
In the Andean nations, populations of Aymara, Quechua, Amazonian tribal and other ethnicities of indigenous people are organized to the hilt; in Bolivia recently, one more president fell to the pressure from below, which continues to galvanize the Indian masses and articulate the message that economic misery for hard-working families is not tolerable. It is not a tidy movement after 500 years of repression, but increasingly it is building its ranks complete with professional bases. Generally throughout the region, an independent direction for government and civil society is starting to take hold. Latin America is not so illiterate anymore; it was always smart enough to know when hunger turns to starvation and to know the difference between mayhem manufactured by U.S. policy and that of revolutionary (sometimes terrorist) forces bent on taking power by force of arms. But Latin America today is increasingly educated and the discourse in its high schools, universities and political forums is rich with historical bases, economic data and a serious dedication to improving the economic lifeblood of their countries. http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096410522

Note: http://www.indiancountr...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon May 22, 2006 7:55 pm
    We need to be careful pointing the finger in this instance. Everyone knows the U.S. is the universal suppressor of civil rights around the globe, but we have our own aboriginals and French-speakers from whom we have stolen and continue to steal resources and labour. What happens if these two groups catch on to what we've been doing? I don't relish the thought of giving my property back to the real owners.

  2. by Innes
    Mon May 22, 2006 8:21 pm
    This is not a "racial" issue and to reduce it to that is a distortion. Disadvantaged minority "racial" groups have been a focus of the left making them more visible but there are huge segments of the racial majorities that have been just as marginalized economically.

    It is an economic "class" issue in which the ruling classes operate in their self-interest with the assistance of the governments they put and keep in power. It all has to do with the control of global capital in an ever decreasing number of hands.

  3. by Patm
    Mon May 22, 2006 11:23 pm
    Another "whacko lefty propaganda piece". Everyone knew that the USA was universally adored and everyone was just jealous of their success. South America wouldn't go left, it was just wishful thinking on the commie's part.

    Of course, that was 14 months ago. Today we see who were the real whackos.

  4. by RPW
    Mon May 22, 2006 11:30 pm
    And good luck to them........it's about time we paid some rent on this mighty fine piece of property. I would say it is only right (er, correct) that the rent should be something like what the BC Liberal government(s) like to pay off the forestry companies to forfeit their tenure, only extended to include the whole province.

    ---
    RickW

  5. by RPW
    Mon May 22, 2006 11:41 pm
    South America moved into the free market system because it was tired of the various juntas and dictatorships that came before. Now it is finding out that the term "free market" has different meaning for different interests, and that one set of bums was merely replaced by another, none of which have had any benefit. Now they are in the process of turfing out the bums (again!), and with any luck, they may enjoy a little <B><I><U>universal</I></U></B> prosperity. <p>Canada (as usual) lags about 10 yesrs behind the times. We've just put into power a guy whose god is the free market system. When we find out how fast and loose this new set of bums has played with our resources and industry, and times get a wee bit leaner, perhaps we will emulate our Southern brethren, and turf out this set of bums, in favour of something more of & for & by, <b>the people</b>.</p><p>---<br>RickW

  6. by hoopoe
    Tue May 23, 2006 4:59 am
    Are you suggesting that the Latin American people chose the "free market system" as you put it? Even to call what has gone on in Latin America for 100+ years free market economics is a complete misnomer. A better phrase is unbridled capitalism fueled by unbridled greed, and yes this was perpetrated chiefly by American corporations, although of late Europe and Canada are guilty parties as well (just that they caught the greed bug late). It was also the juntas, which by the way were installed by foreign interests and not chosen by the people as you seem to imply, that were the instruments of this rape of resources by these corporations back by the US government. Your view of the economic history in this region is just a little twisted I'm afraid.

  7. by RPW
    Tue May 23, 2006 3:10 pm
    Definitely not suggesting they "chose" the free market system. But look at what the alternative were that proceeded the 90's. It's something along the lines of us picking Harper -- look at what the alternative was. Now, like the "free market system" in S. America, we will see that Harper was a mistake as well, and when we can feel ourselves getting screwed, we will have to dump him too.....

    ---
    RickW

  8. Tue May 23, 2006 4:01 pm
    All this boils down to the simple, easily proven fact that:

    "Wealth can not be created, only taken from other sectors, the environment and the future".

    This rule applies to all, whether they are local juntas or moguls, or so called "wealth creating globalizers".

    "Wealth is the temporary control of energy"

    All past and present economic, ideological and religious theories have been and are based on the justification of energy control by special interests. There're no such things as "free trade", "free enterprise", or "communism", or various theocracies, only ruling sectors under different names. And when we scratch the surface, we'll find the same people under any and every flag, or dressup.

    Their real name is "predators".

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  9. by avatar Jacob
    Tue May 23, 2006 5:50 pm
    The last paragraph of the article says it all:

    "A new approach from the U.S. is required to regain a position of respect and affection in the region, because saber rattling, economic punishments and sanctions have run their course. Thus far, this country has not shown much capacity to assess these changing conditions."

    To me (as Canadian) the jist of this is: The US blew it - just as in so many other places in the world.

    Is it a wonder that South America takes a different course? One surely does not have to be coined "left" if you disagree with King George.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news