Our first stop was Damascus, the capital that has nearly achieved full “axis of evil” status in George W. Bush’s Washington. Syria is under sanctions legislation rushed through Congress in 2003, the American ambassador has been withdrawn for “consultation,” and the charge d’affaires tells us that American policy is to “freeze” the country. An official Syria resistant to being frozen is delighted to welcome a group like ours and to demonstrate to its citizenry its ability to do so.
So on our first morning we had an audience with President Bashar al-Assad, a motorcade to whisk us up the mountain to a white marble presidential palace, our photograph on the front page of the next day’s paper, our comings and goings chronicled on the TV news. Tall and gangly, educated in London as an ophthalmologist, Assad is articulate and well-informed. He is unassuming for a head of state (much less a dictator), a man who might pass for a wonkish professor of biology or computer science at an American university. Assad essentially inherited his post from his late father, Hafez al-Assad—posters of the two together are ubiquitous in Damascus—who had come to power in a 1970 coup. He is an Alawite, a minority Sh’ite sect, and his regime is vulnerable to ethnic pressures as well as political ones. Christians, who make up 10 percent of Syria’s population and a much higher share of its professional classes, are in a similar minority position and are probably more at home in cosmopolitan Damascus than anywhere else in the Middle East.
The American Conservative
Note: The American Conservative

<br />
2. Many well-meaning Christians of all stripes, particularly in North America, have been drawn into the erroneous view called "Christian Zionism". This CMEP report did not mention it per se. The problem is of course that many "mainstream Christian churches" are internally divided on the issue. "Dispensationalism" is the theology that espouses this view. I do not believe that more than 50% of Christians are dispensationalists. Read all about it (and also the opposition to it by some courageous denominations) at <a href="http://www.christianzionism.org">www.christianzionism.org</a> and its links.<br />
<br />
3. The essay by professors Mearsheimer and Walt seems to have solicited more and more influence as time goes on. What needed to be said, was said by them. The US voters (also Conservative ones in both parties) must now draw their own unbiased conclusions. This CMEP report tries to do that for them. How successful? I don't know.<br />
<br />
4. But their is more to be said. The influence of the (mostly Zionist and Christian Zionist) mainstream media needs to be countered. And that is what cyberspace does effectively. Thank you, Ron Whyte, for posting this, because it also has implications for Canada and individual Canadians.
What the article speaks to is important. Their idea that a two-state solution is key seems rational and supported by a great number of people. The writer also tries to make it clear that the people of the region so desperately want to talk, to anyone. We should engage them all in dialogue and take this affair out of the hands of the few. The few it seems who don't want a solution at this point.
I also believe the writer made great points about the situation in Syria.
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
<br />
— The Divine Symphony, by Inayat Khan<br />