On August 31, 2004, the WTO ruled that Canada, Brazil, Chile, the European Union, India, Japan, Mexico and South Korea could retaliate by up to 72 percent of the annual anti-dumping and countervailing duties on exports from these countries disbursed to U.S. companies in a given year. To show that we are serious and ready to play hardball, Canada submitted to the WTO the final retaliation authorization request.
Better yet, the federal government wants to hear from you! Have your say here
Note: Have your say here

What the US is doing to softwood, under the Byrd Amendment, is similar. Softwood exporters have to pay extra duties up front to get the lumber into the US. Under the Byrd Amendment, the US then takes those duties and gives them to US softwood mills.
The WTO has deemed this practice as 'protectionist' and also classifies it as an unfair subisdy, because the monies are given back to industry. It has almost given permission to all WTO countries to impose 72% duties on US products entering the countries. So, because the US is imposing about $1billion in Softwood duties, Canada is allowed to impose 720 million in duties on other products to compensate.
If the US repeals the Byrd Amendment, or puts the monies in state or federal coffers, this would be a moot point.
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle ... ID=6899137
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... s/Canadian
http://www.canada.com/national/national ... 86d40eea7c
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
Aren't all gas and oil companies USAmerican? Aren't all of our energy facilities connected to the US grid? Does anyone really think this is going to make any difference? I just laugh at this posturing. I saw Perrin Beatty on Politics today and he said something to the effect that this kind of action would show the US what it was like to be in unfair trade deals. And it would basically change the way they do business with us. AHAHAHA!
The US is going to have to open their borders to way more foreign ownership as Canada had to when we were 3rd world indebtedness. Isn't that how the world really works? We loan your government more money than they will ever be able to pay back,so, your government gives away all your resources in repayment. That's what I call "free trade".
I found the following insight, “The truth is 'we' and 'Americans' are too loaded words.”
There are other words that also loaded words and in my opinion the use of this loaded language hampers critical thought and investigation as to what is behind the curtains of loaded words.
The curtain or screen has on it exactly what the corporation wish for us to be occupied with and not much more.
When I see the words in the title piece to which I now respond my head reels!
Is NOT of one mind and certainly has no body by which to “fight”. The country’s politicians are in the pocket of international giants like Andersen Accounting or ACCENTURE or some other interconnected conglomerate that have no interest in fair trade.
It is all smoke and mirrors for untrained minds to wrangle on and on about to the point where
Working Canadians turn away from it in disgust.
And the amazing part of it all is there are so-called professional that have degrees in any number of disciplines prattling on as though it were all real.
Will it change?
Not likely!
Not until the “average Joe” starts to take an interest and exposes it all for what it is; a fabulous dog and pony show with devastation results.
You seem to forget politicians in Canada still need people to elect them. They will cater to whoever can satisfy their need to be re-elected. If enough ordinary joes and janes let it be known that they want something, their call will be heeded.
So why 'fight'? Fight, a word of action, and no better word considering where we find ourselves. We are not dealing with an ordinary neighbour. We live next door to an aggressive bunch at the moment. Fighting is like dancing - it’s always best when you know your partner. Action is what they understand, so it seems action is what they will get.
Corporations do have a measure of power and strength in Canada, but even that is easily defeated when people both speak up and hit them where it hurts – in their bottom line. Corporations wield enormous power in the halls of US decision-making, and if they begin to suffer instead of profit, they will speak, and they will also be heard.
Yep, one big game.
Roy
---
Dave Ruston
Find out where all the ceo's live and have a party on their front lawn. Do a few other things to get their attention.
They need to have us IN THEIR FACE, or they will keep on smothering us forever.
BTW, that includes banks, the worst of the bunch !!
---
"Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan
or these dudes
The Bar, the Pulpit and the Press Nefariously combine To Cry up an usurpt Pow'r And stamp it Right Devine. -1695
---
Dave Ruston