"The New Fascism" In Canada And The Western World

Posted on Tuesday, July 11 at 08:47 by Robin Mathews
Ironically, Hamas became the democratically elected government of the Palestinians because Israel, the U.S., Canada, and the European Community refuse to demand a minimum of democratic rights and freedoms for the Palestinian population. The “New Fascist”, Stephen Harper government in Canada was first to sever financial support to the Palestinian democracy when the Palestinian people freely and democratically chose a government which is a challenge to “The New Fascism” – a term defined later in this column. Hamas presents a challenge to those of us who believe in democracy. But it should be a democratic challenge – not a military assault and a rape of Palestinian democracy. Primarily, Hamas describes the failure of the Western nations to demand real democratic accountability in the Middle East. It does not describe, primarily, the blind aggressiveness of “fundamentalist”, “anti-democratic” Palestinians. Even at this moment Switzerland is the only Western country to point out that the Israeli invasion of Gaza is a violation of international law. Persistently, focus upon Western-nation failure is blocked at every point by governments, press, and the Western media. Take, for instance, The Globe and Mail’s “new generation” columnist Doug Saunders. Usually writing nonsense, and shown in a picture as if he’s just stepped out of bed after sleeping the night in his suit, Saunders continues his vacuous pattern of “analysis” in the July 8 issue with a column entitled: “When jihad comes with a local accent”. Saunders refers to Britain and Canada, quotes an English sociologist – all to point out that second-generation immigrant people often are searching for roots and often become politically extreme. That is Saunders’ explanation of Muslim violence and threats of violence in the West. Got it? Second generation malaise explains the “rage and alienation that lead people to blow themselves and others up in the name of an abstract cause”.(page F3) “…in the name of an abstract cause”. What more insulting phrase could be used? The U.S./NATO illegitimate invasion and occupation of Afghanistan; the horrendous, U.S. Coalition, illegal rape of Iraq; the brutality and sadism of Guantanamo; the racist disregard of international law in relation to Arabs and other Muslims; Palestinians scattered in refugee camps decades old – 220,000 in Lebanon alone; the blight of Israeli oppression; and the repression in Arab puppet states where (like Hamas) the Muslim Brotherhood is growing are, declares white, Western Doug Saunders – an “abstract” cause. Speaking for journalism in The New Fascism, Saunders blames the Muslims, the Muslims, the Muslims. He pretends the U.S.-led West is not conducting a horrendous, racist, economic and military jihad against Arab and other Muslim countries and peoples daring to want real independence. That is a fact people in Doug Saunders’ world will never admit. Take Guantanamo. The Supreme Court of the USA has ruled the Guantanamo operation is unconstitutional. The Bush administration is ignoring the U.S. Supreme Court in an act of national and international lawlessness. One might call the Bush behaviour a New Fascist rejection of the rule of law – though it is not the first rejection in U.S. history by a long shot. The Iraq war itself is a violation and rejection of international law. Much earlier, in 1823, a major legal battle was fought in the U.S. about, essentially, the eradication and genocide of the native people there. Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Marshall found the U.S. federal government was obliged to protect the Indians from genocide. President Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court and “is reputed to have said, ‘John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it’”. (Anthony Hall, The American Empire and the Fourth World, McGill/Queens, 2003, p. 405). Genocide of the native Indians in the USA continued unchallenged. Throughout the Second World War, IBM supplied (and profitted from doing so) the necessary components to make the Nazi Death Camps efficient. IBM’s president, Thomas Watson, an open admirer of Hitler, received the highest Nazi honour available to a non-German, in 1937. Edwin Black writes: “When the war ended, IBM NY was able to recapture its problematic but valuable German subsidiary, recover its machines and assimilate all the profits.” (Edwin Black, IBM and the Holocaust, NY, Crown, 2001, p. 398) What was, in effect, trading with the enemy and active support for the Nazis' brutal genocide somehow escaped U.S. justice. A historical pattern of profit-opportunism erasing justice is clear in the USA. The Supreme Court decision about Guantanamo has been abandoned by the press and media (and Congress) in the world of The New Fascism. A hugely important decision by the Court, it is quickly ignored so that it may be forgotten. A key sign of The New Fascism is contempt for international law. Historically, totalitarian countries have often erased humane and international safeguards for enemies in order to dominate with whatever brutality they have wished to employ. The U.S. is in that precise situation, and the Stephen Harper “New Fascist” Canadian government backs the U.S. totally. Look at Mexico. As a half million people demonstrate in Mexico City, claiming a fraudulent election, The Globe and Mail (July 8 06 A12) presents a carefully photographed and sanitized Felipe Calderon, the Right (PAN) candidate who claims election. Hardly mentioning the conflict over the election, the Globe’s story is a series of warm testimonials to Felipe Calderon’s political abilities. The Globe doesn’t report that Lopez Obrador, convincingly claiming victory, represents the party which – it is almost universally agreed – had its election fraudulently stolen in 1988. The electric system failed (?) in the midst of the election count, the counting machines all went down, and – to everyone’s surprise – the candidate for the Right (the PRI) won the election. The U.S. was delighted and entered quickly into good terms with the fraudulent PRI president. The 1988 fraudulent election was not seriously questioned by any Western “democratic” government. Now, with the help of publications like the Globe and Mail, Western countries are trying to ignore the present, almost certainly fraudulent Mexican election. But, this time, the Mexican people refuse to ignore the fraudulence. As the Middle East is proving, continued oppression eventually results in resistance. Resistance to oppression is called by The New Fascism “insurgency”, “terrorism”, “religious fundamentalism”. Finally, come home to Canada. Look at the softwood lumber debacle. In Canada The New Fascism is united with cringing colonialism, with – that is to say – abject fawning upon the USA. We should be clear. In conventional definition, fascism is a political attitude that places the nation-state (as defined by an undemocratic dictatorship or oligarchy) before all else – before individual or human rights or larger international responsibilities. Keys to its general understanding are (a) totalitarian rule (b) the use of violent police force against citizens (c) the use of population members to aggrandize the leadership by rallies, parading, “dying for the country”, and so on (d) a gigantic indoctrination process to force conformity – employing all the press and media (e) and contempt for law, especially international law. The New Fascism in Canada and the Western World, to begin, (1) is marked by a fraudulent misrepresentation of democracy by the corporate class that wants to erase it. Democratic trust and processes are violated in order to destroy democracy. We must remember that a very large segment of serious U.S. opinion believes George W. Bush came to power as president of the United States through violation of democratic trust and democratic processes there. In The New Fascism (2) democracy is presented as a condition permitting unlimited and often immoral “liberty” to private corporations existing in societies for whom democratic elections are more and more a sham. When the Palestinians elect, democratically, a government the Western nations don’t like, the Palestinians may be invaded. When the Mexican people attempt to choose a leftward government, forces in control of balloting set to work to pollute the election process. When the Eurocrats of the European Union wanted to pass a constitution favouring private corporations, press, media, politicans, and corporate leaders lied about its contents, polluting the referendum process, until the French awakened, and with the Dutch prevented passage of the new constitution. The New Fascism is marked (3) by a more persistent taking of democratic power by people working primarily for The New Fascism and its corporate sponsors. David Emerson, MP and cabinet minister, began his political climb by stripping the B.C. forest industry of reasonable safety protections – in concert with Gordon Campbell, B.C. premier. (Since then, forestry deaths have escalated staggeringly.) Then David Emerson (as first Chair of the disabled B.C. Ferries operation) set up the leadership intended to vitiate and destroy B.C. Ferries as a public corporation. A proved henchman of Gordon Campbell, Emerson was lubricated by the greasy provincial/federal Liberal mafia into a federal candidacy for the Liberal Party – “hand-picked” by Paul Martin. Emerson won and became Minister of Industry. He was not Minister of International Trade when the Liberals were to begin yet another negotiation on softwood lumber. Paul Martin and George Bush met at Cancun, and – it is alleged in B.C. – Bush insisted David Emerson be a Canadian negotiator. George Bush insisted…. If the allegation is true, we may assume that sell-out Gordon Campbell made clear to the Bush forces that David Emerson would negotiate on their behalf. Paul Martin’s government was defeated. Having double-crossed the B.C. people, David Emerson proceeded to double-cross Paul Martin. This time he was made Minister of International Trade by Stephen Harper. With Harper’s blessing he worked for the Bush forces and double-crossed Canada; the softwood lumber deal is a huge declaration of colonial subordination and a fawning celebration of inferiority. His third or fourth double-cross seems to be a double-cross of his old soul-mate, Gordon Campbell, since B.C. forest interests (and Campbell) express huge dissatisfaction with the “agreement”. But that may be a ruse. Campbell may want a surrogate to turn B.C. forests over to U.S. interests. In that case he and Emerson will be working together. The New Fascism in Canada means (a) the rule of private corporations (b) the elevation to power of people adhering to The New Fascism (c) the wholesale use of press and media to lie to the population about the meaning of democracy (d) the destruction of health and safety codes, of limits upon police action, and of all publicly owned services and institutions (e) and total subservience to the USA in order to end Canadian sovereignty The New Fascists in Canada intend the end of Canada as a self-determining, self-respecting community. If they gain increasing power and confidence, we may expect them to use any (fascistic) form of force to gain their ends. While that is the condition of the Canadian community now, the political opposition throughout the country is in denial. The federal Liberal Party could very well produce a Stephen Harper clone as new leader. The federal NDP recognizes almost none of the problems I cite. Peace and anti-war groups are in fragmented gatherings doing what would be good work if the whole community were not threatened. None of them appears to be calling for a common front to face The New Fascism. For The New Fascism taking over Canada seems to be a cakewalk. Each public concern group – the Council of Canadians, Canadians Concerned About Free Trade, Peace Groups, Anti-War groups, Social Democrats, Advocates for the Environment, and more, are all focussed on partial issues, forgetting what Mao said when challenged for making a common front with Chiang Kai Shek against the Japanese invaders. Said Mao: “You cannot have a Socialist China if there is no China”. By the same token, you cannot have a democratic Canada if there is no Canada. The New Fascism is at work, now, to wipe it out. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 13, 2006]

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by baybye
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:05 pm
    Well ..... for the life of me I don't understand how the writer can maintain the Palestinean election was sanctity itself, democracy in it's perfect state, while all the others mentioned were exercises in piracy/facism. WOW !!More importantly, I do not understand why one would object to Israel desiring to repatriate, at whatever cost, it's kidnapped citizen, a soldier, from those who seized him in a deadly attack across a boarder and who advocate violence as democracy (as if the poor unfortunate tribal sand-dwellers had an iota of what the difference is), telling the world their "democratically elected" government wants to violently erase another country, in fact all its citizens, from the map. Where this stuff originates amazes me. Perhaps there is a school somewhere ............., in the woods, ....... near Orillia,,,,,,,, paintball,,,,,, ???

  2. Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:01 pm
    or maybe it came from an objective view of reality.

    ---
    Michael

  3. Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:04 pm
    You don't understand. Every Mathews post is about one idea - that America in its totality is evil and without any redeeming qualities. His "articles" consist of collections of unconnected anectotal references to American misdeeds, which serve (in his mind anyway) to justify his central argument - that Americans are evil and Canadians must reject and resist *all* things American.

    Israel is an ally of the US, so it is evil by association. Anyone who opposes the US for any reason is seen as good and noble in Mathews' eyes, and the same holds by extension to Israel's opponents. But at least Americans recognize Canada's right to exist, which is more than can be said for Hamas vis a vis Israel.

    Robin Mathews represents the Canadian nationalist in his vilest form. I wish more people on Vive could see this.

  4. Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:39 pm
    Hey Bro baybye
    this makes more sense

    Wal ..... fo' th' life of me ah doesn't unnerstan' how th' writer kin maintain th' Palestinean eleckshun was sanckity itse'f, democracy in it's puffick state, while all t'others menshuned were exercises in piracy/facism, dawgone it. WOW ! Fry mah hide!! Fry mah hide!Mo'e impo'tantly, ah do not unnerstan' whuffo' one'd objeck t'Israel desuhin' t'repatriate, at whutevah cost, it's kidnapped citizen, a soldier, fum them who seized him in a daidly attack acrost a boarder an' who advocut violence as democracy (as eff'n th' pore unfo'tunate tribal san'-dfineers had an iota of whut th' difference is), tellyng th' wo'ld their "democratically elecked" govment be hankerin' t'violently erase t'other country, in fack all its citizens, fum th' map. Whar this hyar stuff origeenates amazes me. Perhaps thar is a skoo somewhar ............., in th' woods, ....... near Orillia,,,,,,,, paintball,,,,,, ???
    hehehe

    ---
    The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein

  5. by Jeff
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:58 pm
    Here is what I don’t get:

    “The “New Fascist”, Stephen Harper government in Canada was first to sever financial support to the Palestinian democracy when the Palestinian people freely and democratically chose a government”

    So Canada, who for pretty good reasons (IMHO) labels Hamas as a terrorists organization, doesn’t like that Hamas was elected.

    Fine.

    So Canada stops doing business with them, if you will.

    What’s the problem with that?

    Let me put this another way: If Canada elected a Neo-Nazi Holocaust-denying PM, wouldn’t it be fair to assume that Israel would sever its ties? Wouldn’t that be Israel’s right?

    Here is another: If OBL were to be democratically elected President of some Northern Pakistan breakaway province that just claimed independence, would you expect Canada and the world to “respect” it’s choice? Sure, by cutting off all aid, ties, relations, etc.

    That’s the price one pays. It isn’t “ignoring” the wishes of any people, or turning your back. Quite the opposite, in my opinion. It’s simply reacting to their election results as you would in any country.

  6. Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:14 pm
    In the UK and in the USA one finds many people who do not recognise the Conservative or Republican parties as being either the parties they supported for a long time or speaking for conservatives now. I had an interesting conversation with a couple of the people who produce <i>The American Conservative</i> magazine and find that they believe that the Republican Party as it is now doesn't provide them with a "home". It is the same phenomenon here in the UK - the Conservative Party doesn't provide a "home" for Tories. Robin Matthews speaks the language we (in the UK and USA) would like to hear from our own commentators.<br><br> I believe that British and Canadian Tories have much to say to each other: more, in fact, than either has to say to American Republicans - and American Republicans like Dr Anthony Sullivan, for example, agree. But even so, all of us are dismayed at the direction that the politics of our countries are metamorphosing in. I think Robin Matthews explicates it well in his article above.<br><br> The democratic process has been contaminated in the Middle East, not just in Palestine, by relentless intereference in the domestic politics of the countries by Britain, France, and America - especially America which tends to install and keep compliant placemen in power (the British and the French were more subtle). It's understandable that when electorates get the chance of genuine elections they are going to chose people who stand for the opposite of America's placemen (or France's, etc)(<i>e.g.</i> Algeria in 1992; Palestine this year).<br><br> It is ingenuous to credit the Israeli incursion into Gaza as an attempt to free a captured soldier - such an all arms combined service operation requires weeks, and possibly months, of planning. The initial Op Order for this had to have been drafted long before the Frenchman was taken prisoner.<br><br> Further, given the political culture of the Muslim world, their electorates are going to chose people who fit in to that political culture: in other words, genuine democratic elections anywhere in the Muslim World are likely to produce parliamentarians who espouse Islamic principles and policies.<br><br> For example, every election in Turkey since 1950 has seen the "Islamic" vote strengthen, so that now all parties advocate Islam-friendly policies, not just the avowedly Islamic/conservative <i>Adalet ve Kalkinma (AK) Partisi</i>. Why should this be so surprising? If Western countries are genuine about democracy, they should begin now to learn to live with the result; after all, the "Western Tradition" incorporates Islamic cultures too.

  7. by Deacon
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:55 pm
    There is no "New Fascism".<br />
    <br />
    It is just the continuation of the same Fascism that was responsible for World War II.<br />
    <br />
    If you were look up the involvement of the Bush family in World War II you would find that Dubyuhs grandfather was involved, along with others, with financing Hitler and his ascension to power back in the 1930's.<br />
    <br />
    It was so obvious that the bank in question, Brown Brothers Harriman was censured under the "Trading with the Enemy Act" in 1943. For more info concerning this follow this link:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_2">http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_2</a><br />
    <br />
    You can find more on your own, if you care to look.<br />
    <br />
    I see no reason to believe that the latest crop of Bush' are any different than their immediate ancestors in either political leanings or in their desire for global conquest.<br />
    <br />
    <p>---<br>"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"<br />
    <br />
    "The Weapon" - Rush

  8. by Deacon
    Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:06 pm
    My reason for my last posting is simply that if Harper and Bush have at least as much, or more, in common as we are led to believe then it is no big leap to assume that any Fascist leanings would also be common ground between the two.

    If that is indeed the case, we are living in perilous times.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  9. Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:34 pm
    Corporatism is fascism, as it doesn't recognize the " one person one vote system", but relies on the voting power of the artificial entities of corporate shares.

    Therefore, any political ideology, or economic system, based on the decision making, voting power of artificial entities, controlled by a power elite, is a form of fascism.

    In many ways very similar to the communist politbureau, "people's democratic" system, where the people had no say.
    Corporate boards are the same racket as the politbureus.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake. BC.

  10. by RPW
    Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:40 am
    <blockquote>America in its totality is evil and without any redeeming qualities.</blockquote> While this part is unquestionably true, where Matthews errs is assuming that those opposed to the US are automatically "good".<p>---<br>"It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes." <br />
    - Joseph Stalin

  11. by RPW
    Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:46 am
    So let me ask you this:
    If Canada reserves the right to top financing a "terrorist" government, why did it previously finance a known inept and corrupt government that was not serving the needs and wishes of the people it governed? What does that have to say about Canada?

    ---
    "It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes."
    - Joseph Stalin

  12. Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:17 am
    "While this part is unquestionably true"

    Wow, do you really believe this? Or are you just playing straw man?

    Just so I'm clear, you don't believe that America the country has any redeeming value or has contibuted in any positive way to the world. Do you extend that to its citizens as well, or do you draw a distinction? Mathews is pretty careful when it comes to saying "US" or "USA" instead of "Americans", but his meaning is quite unmistakeable.

    I'm seriously wondering if I should be thanking you right now. I'm trying to imagine what the reaction on here would be if such an unqualified, blanket condemnation were directed at *any other* country.

    In high school, I was a die-hard Cold War fanatic. But I still recognized (grudgingly perhaps) some positive things that came out of the Soviet Union - for instance, their contributions to space exploration. And I definitely made a distinction between the peoples of Russia and the Soviet regime. Mathews considers the US to be *intrinsically* evil, and if you agree with him, you're just as bad as he is.

  13. Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:17 am
    I wouldn't go so far as to call neoconnery fascist but it has very strong fascist tendencies. Let's say of any of its competeting ideologies, liberalism, paleo-conservatism, libertarianism, social democracy or libertarian socialism, the neocons are the closest thing to fascism. Someone already mentioned the Nazi links with the Bush crime family. It should be noted that most of the important industrialists in the US supported fascism in the 1930's. The neocons are the spiritual, and sometimes even the physical, decendants of these fasci-lovers. One must use the concept of fascism not as a left-wing swear word but as an analytical tool. What aspects of fascism are found in neoconnery?
    1. The end justifies the means 2. The Big Lie Technique 3. Militarism and a glorification of war and empire 4. The corporate state 5. Attacks on working class living standards 6. Virulent attacks on labor and socialism 7. restriction of basic rights 8, whipping up fear and use of scape goats 9. Social darwinism 10 a hatred of pluralism.

  14. Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:01 am
    it may as well be called facism, because it's sure not democracy. the only <br />
    true form of democracy is the iroquois constituion <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/">http://www.angelfire.com/</a><br />
    folk/sovereignty/consitution.html<br />
    <br />
    anything else is 'faux'. when the u.s. fathers formed the country they <br />
    borrowed from the iroquois constitution, but only parts of it. so what we <br />
    have in north america and the western world, and the countries we try to <br />
    impose 'democracy' on is only other fields for the oligarchy to rule. <br />
    <br />
    deacon is right about grandaddy bush , prescott (and ford, rockefella et al) <br />
    supporting nazi germany. prescott had a pig iron plant there that was left <br />
    unscathed by both the nazis and the allies (figure that one out when just <br />
    about anything else of that nature was raized).



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news