Izzy Asper, Barbara Frum, Warren Davis And The Robot Right

Posted on Wednesday, October 15 at 22:00 by Robin Mathews
The mogul d’Izzy Asper contributed generously to the lowering of news presentation standards in Canada and to the subtle and unsubtle gagging of journalistic freedom. He also built an information conglomerate, CanWest Global Communications Corp, which is recognized by many as a threat to the quality of democracy in Canada. (No self-respecting government would permit such concentration of information power in the hands of one enterprise.) When he was boondoggled by Conrad Black into paying a Lord’s ransom for the National Post, Asper flabbergasted the world. You could be, he proved, even more democratically challenged than Conrad Black. Canada? Who cares about Canada!

From the maggoty flesh of the National Post rises Catechism for the Robot Right – almost always fawning on the U.S.A. Only the most generous would call what rises off its pages ‘news’.

Journalists in Canada love the d’Izzy Aspers of this world, especially if they are rich. The papers had as much concentration on Asper as they would if a Prime Minister or Canadian monarch had died. Asper, we were told, made a great contribution. Contribution? He loved an argument they told us – which is doubtless why major journalists resigned his employ. He would go into a room and – to everyone’s surprise – he was willing to talk to anybody; he wasn’t fussy or proud. What humanity! Newspaper inches and hours of media time were spent on such gigantic irrelevancies. Very, very little was said about d’Izzy Asper’s destructive role in Canadian democracy.

That reminds me of Barbara Frum about whom we hear – almost tirelessly – still: eulogies, encomia, praise, adulation from people in the communications trades. Barbara Frum is never weighed for what she really was – the Ice Cold Mama of the Robot Right. My first encounter with her was on a TV show she shared with Warren Davis for the Ontario Region. It was the beginning of her climb, Ontario’s Seven O’Clock Show on public affairs and timely events. James Steele and I went on the show for several minutes.

We were working to break down discrimination against Canadians of all colours and creeds in the cultural institutions. Canadians were not being hired into colleges, universities, museums, galleries, orchestras, and so on. U.S. people were being hired heavily. Brits were, too. And East Indians were – anybody, in fact, who wasn’t Canadian. Canadian textbooks were as rare as Dinosaur bones. Courses in colleges and universities dealing with Canada were even rarer.

We had a conversation with Frum and Davis and went back to our hotel. Next day we met Toronto graduate students who wanted jobs in Canada. They were alarmed. When we’d left the show, Warren Davis had tacked on a statement that “we” certainly didn’t want what Mathews and Steele advocated because that would take Canada back to having quotas on Jews in medical schools, and other such bad practices. He was suggesting (obviously with Frum’s approval) that Mathews and Steele were anti-semites (and probably racists). Great broadcasting.

Steele was deeply grieved. He went to see the producer, who refused to see him. That pulled me in. I phoned the executive producer, met him, told him he had to act or we’d sue if possible and that, anyway, we’d begin every public event (on a national tour) reporting on the slime factor in Warren Davis and Barbara Frum.

A few hour later I was invited back to the show. Not Steele. I told them we worked as a team. They said there wasn’t time for two people. I’d be on three minutes. Davis would explain our distress; I would make my case for two minutes. That’s all. “Three minutes off the top” as they say in the business. In and out.

But they were lying. I was being set up to be wiped out. When I finished my two minutes, Warren Davis went on the attack, determined to prove I was an anti-semite, racist, bigot. (Frum sat demurely looking on.) I was – as intended – totally unprepared.

But it didn’t work. The more Davis attacked, the more stupid he looked. At mid-show and ‘commercial break’, the producer announced that segment over. “I’m not finished”, Warren Davis shouted angrily – and the show went on. Without a murmur from the Ice Cold Mama of the Robot Right sitting beside him, Davis tried again to show me a racist, anti-semite bigot.

When the show stopped, Frum slipped away without a word. Davis turned on me and told me he’d never met anyone as despicable as I was. As he was leaving, the loudspeaker announced a telephone call for him, but he flung himself from the studio shouting, “I’m not here”. Not one member of the TV team spoke to me or acknowledged my presence. I made my way back to the make-up person to be un-pancaked. She filled the very lowest place on the TV totem pole. She told me the show was terrific, that I’d been great. (Ah yes, the people….)

I left, unnoticed, walking through the CBC parking lot to get to our hotel. A figure loomed up in the darkness. It was Warren Davis. “Mr. Davis”, I said. He stopped. “Civilized people,” I said, “can debate and disagree without rancour and slanderous behaviour.” He looked at me with contempt and said: “I don’t want to talk to you. Crawl back under the rock where you came from.”. I responded mildly that there was no room because the space was reserved for him. We parted. Subsequently, I reported the scandalous behaviour to CBC headquarters. Only Davis was “punished” by being taken off the air for a week. No inquiry was made about how such a set-up could happen. No public apology was made. No media commentator ever referred to the amazing TV show. The event disappeared and, doubtless, will never be shown on any “memory lane” TV re-run.

That night Steele and I telephoned the CBC reception desk where the person on duty regularly recorded responses to shows and sent reports to headquarters. She was reticent. But, finally, she told us the phones began ringing (no e-mail then) ten minutes into the show and went on ringing until after eleven p.m. People telephoned long distance and paid to wait in line so they could express their indignation at CBC and the Seven O’Clock Show. She said to us that evening (and repeated the statement several years later when being interviewed on the day of her retirement) that more calls came about that show than any other in her many, many years on the job. She told us, also,the calls were overwhelmingly in my favour. (Ah yes, the people….)

For such a display of stellar broadcasting technique Frum became the famous female half of the hosts on As It Happens. I heard her interviewing the head of a union on strike at the Toronto Children’s Hospital. She didn’t ask about the need to strike. She didn’t ask about working conditions or wages. She berated him for putting his workers on the street. How did he feel removing them from getting their salaries? Didn’t he feel like a chump? The Ice Cold Mama of the Robot Right was still learning how to sink the reactionary dagger without it being seen. That interview was a mess. She hadn’t learned yet.

Several days later I was telephoned and asked to be interviewed by Frum on As It Happens. I said I wouldn’t appear with such an anti-labour shrew, and I’d tell others to keep off the show. Doubtless, responses like mine encouraged Frum to sharpen her Robot Right interviewing techniques. She couldn’t always be silent and let someone else try to sink the knife. Nor could she show her Robot Right face very often as obviously as she had done with the union leader. She had to get smooth. She got smooth.

After 1970, the magazine Canadian Forum celebrated its 50th anniversary by publishing an anthology. As It Happens would have ignored the event but The New York Review of Books reviewed the Forum book. That made it important for As It Happens. The New York Review of Books didn’t use a smart Canadian, but a U.S. academic, ignorant of Canada, very recently arrived here. His name was E. Zed Friedenberg. He began his review by dumping on Canada and didn’t stop dumping all the way through. Would I debate him on As It Happens? Yes. I read a few of his very bad books and got ready.

He was in the Halifax studio. Frum and co-host were in Toronto. I was in Ottawa. Freidenberg and I debated. I called him on his bottomless ignorance. He couldn’t answer. He stormed from the Halifax studio, his heavy footsteps being heard all over Canada. “Will he be back?” Frum asked the Halifax producer. “Not by the look on his face”, he replied. We closed the interview on a light note.

A week later Frum reported that there had been some response to the show. Then the hosts read a few comments supporting me and an equal number of comments supporting Friedenberg. Like other listeners I thought nothing was amiss until by total accident I fell into conversation with one of the juniors on the As It Happens team a few weeks later. She told me they were swamped with responses to the Friedenberg/Mathews show. (Frum said nothing about that.) And the junior told me that more than 90 percent of the responses supported me and commented adversely on the behaviour of E. Zed Friedenberg. (Frum didn’t tell the audience that either.) As It Happens read responses as if they had arrived in an equal proportion, plainly falsifying the real response to the event. Frum was getting smooth.

As It Happens couldn’t show that Canadians objected to a dumb yankee trying to put them down unfairly. Barbara Frum certainly couldn’t, the Ice Cold Mama of the Robot Right. For the large majority of Canadian journalists U.S. people are superior by definition. You don’t knock them. Frum went on honing her skills and passing them on to people like Mary-Lou Findlay, Barbara Budd, and Michael Enright. They are never as happy as when they can interview someone from the U.S.A. They are even more happy if that someone is a reactionary U.S. General from a reactionary U.S. think-tank. Other foreigners are also attractive as long as they are working at U.S. universities or think-tanks. Canadians just don’t measure up, ever, to chest-thumping, Robot Right yankees.

Times have changed. Most Canadian journalists (being essentially anti-Canadian) have always been suspicious of Canadians who are outspoken about Canadian legitimacy. They used to ask them on to shows occasionally and then “do a Friedenberg” on them – falsify audience response or practice some other kind of double-cross. Now they don’t even ask those kinds of Canadians at all, or very, very rarely. When the umpteenth reactionary yankee General from a reactionary yankee think-tank is interviewed, the audience begins to think maybe he represents “Canadian reality”.

When Frum is remembered, (as with d’Izzy Asper), she calls forth, still, eulogies, encomia, praise, and adulation from people in the communications trades. No one asks how such a shining advocate of decency and democracy could produce a son who reached Robot Right Paradise as writer for president George W. Bush and created – it is said – the hate-phrase “axis of evil”. No one has really looked at Barbara Frum’s politics. As with d’Izzy Asper, they tell “chuckle” anecdotes about her; they say what a professional she was. So was d’Izzy Asper a professional. No one asks: “Professional at what?”
---------

Robin Mathews publishes on culture, politics, the arts, and Canadian Intellectual history. He lives in Vancouver with his wife, a potter. His column appears regularly on Vive le Canada.

Comments: rmathews@sfu.ca

Note: rmathews@sfu.ca

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:31 pm
    Wow, and I thought I could hold a grudge.

    The vitriol is unfortunate because buried underneath the ad-
    hominem attacks are some important issues. This polemic is an injustice
    to those important issues.

  2. Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:37 pm
    Oh, no doubt, the Canadian media by and large are staunch, right wing anti-Canadian- pro American puppets! You do see it all the time, newscasters and journalists finding anything to slam Canada and praise the capitalist Gods to the south! I can remember when the U.S. started the war in Iraq a few months ago, and I was watching the coverage on Hamilton`s CHCH, a subsidiary of Dizzy`s Can west global. newsman Dan MacLean and CH Talk live host Bill Kelly were talking about the war, as well as taking responses from people calling in with various opinions. Both MacLean and Kelly, you would have thought, were personally instructed by Bush and Cheney on what to tell the public, because they both kept driving home their support for the U.S. war and the necessity of removing terrorists and rogue leaders. I can also remember, when I used to buy the Toronto Sun, well, the day after Mike Harris got elected for his first term in Ontario, the Sun right away went from a sort of left of centre opinionated paper, did a total about face, and was now a staunch advocate of the common sense revolution, equipped with all of the rhetoric of \'gotta get those beer drinkin, cigarette smokin, welfare moms and put them to work, and, private companies can do better at providing services for the public than governments. needless to say, when I learned that Mulroney was on the board of Sun media, I quit buying that rag of a paper!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  3. by N Say
    Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:55 pm
    What else can you expect from the corporate media? It represents the opinion of the business community & nothing more.

    ---
    "Finally I am becoming stupider no more." - epitaph of mathematician Paul Erdos

  4. Sat Oct 18, 2003 12:22 am
    I have to say although I know where Mathews is coming from, I was a bit reluctant to post this piece for the exact reason that it reads to me like more of a personal grudge than a more reasoned explanation of the (very real) threat that media concentration poses to Canadian democracy. I thought I\'d post it and let readers decide, since we do try to give fair share to opinions on this site--however I agree that this would be far more valuable if Mathews would focus more on presenting facts and some balance than his personal vendettas. I may yet pull it and ask for a rewrite.

  5. Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:25 am
    It`s your site, Susan, but I hope for the sake of freedom of speech that you do not pull it. The article is not racist, sexist, or anything like that. Sure, we all want facts, but opinions count too. I see here an article by someone who`s frustrated by this whole game, and has found a constructive outlet to vent. I don`t know, maybe I`m wrong, but that`s what I see.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  6. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:14 am
    I\'m sure we could bug Matthews to be even more focused, and specific, but I personally loved this piece. The anecdotes really help, in my opinion.

  7. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:26 am
    Exactly! This article was a mere starting point, and I loved it. I always wondered why my father left the radio on, when Enright, Budd and Mart Lou Findlay came on the radio. They seemed so tired, and thoughtless. My dad must have been dulled by them, because he rarely seemed to question much. When I was younger, I always wondered why CBC ALWAYS seemed to interview American researchers. I was actually believing, for a while, that Ivy-League Universities were BETTER than the best in Canada. I now know, through numerous experiences, that despite their smaller class sizes, they are often inferior -hard to get into, easy once you\'re there.

    P.S. - can you believe the neo-con Mary-Lou Findlay was APPOINTED MODERATOR (!!!) of the Ontario provincial leaders debate. (Of course minus the leader of the Green Party.) Mary-Lou Findlay said almost nothing, proving ineffective. An 9-year old debater would have been 10X her superior. She purposely ignored the major issues (homelessness, poverty, Toronto!!!) for over 1.5 hours!

    I wonder who appointed Mary Lou-Findlay moderator? Remember, former St. Paul\'s Tory MPP, and current partner of Ernie Eves Isabel Bassett runs TV Ontario now. (perhaps not much longer.) Basset is a gracious, careerist neo-con. I wouldn\'t put it past her, though.

  8. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:32 am
    Really? I never knew that about Mulroney. That being said, THE TORONTO SUN WAS OWNED BY CONRAD BLACK!!! What did you expect? Any opportunity and he seized it. It is now owned by Quebecor. Does anyone have any information about Quebecor\'s political leanings? The Sun still seems right-of-centre.......babbling, avoiding te core issues, pulling the wool over people\'s eyes, perhaps to exploit the intelligence of most of its readers.

  9. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:32 am
    Really? I never knew that about Mulroney. That being said, THE TORONTO SUN WAS OWNED BY CONRAD BLACK!!! What did you expect? Any opportunity and he seized it. It is now owned by Quebecor. Does anyone have any information about Quebecor\'s political leanings? The Sun still seems right-of-centre.......babbling, avoiding te core issues, pulling the wool over people\'s eyes, perhaps to exploit the intelligence of most of its readers.

  10. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:34 am
    Oh please. Don\'t be ridicuous, Susan. That\'s so wishy-washy and Canadian of you. We get enough biased crap for the neo-cons. We can take a little bit of it and more from the other side. Why be so politically-correct?

  11. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:38 am
    Ask for a re-write? And ask to hear the last from Mr. Matthews. What you don\'t grasp, Susan, is that people actually respond just as much or more to opinions, than facts -because they are personalized. Pulling this would be wrong. What is this, an arrogant, elitist, un-biased think-tank? Leave the article alone.

  12. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:39 am
    Please leave the article on here.

    Thanks.

  13. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:41 am
    I agree, we don\'t have to please everyone. We can have our opinion, too.

  14. Sat Oct 18, 2003 7:42 am
    No censorship, please.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news