I remember reading 3 or 4 years ago, in Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard," of a strategy to dominate the world that would result in the loss of freedom for American citizens. Brzezinski recognized the inherent threat that liberty posed to the development of empire. He stated:
"It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization." (p.35)
Brzezinski's prescient forecast has proved to be astonishingly accurate. The determination of the neocons, the Federalist Society, the far-right radio giants, the Olin, Scaife, Coors and Bradley foundations, and the entire stable of right-wing, quasi-fascist groups that operate openly within American society, have pounded the final wooden stake into the heart of the personal freedom. The basic legal protections that safeguard the citizen from the arbitrary and hostile action of the state have been rescinded. We all stand naked before the absolute power of the President.
The government has no case against Jose Padilla, a hapless Chicago gang-banger who allegedly visited Pakistan before he was arrested at O'Hare airport 3 and a half years ago. He is simply an unwitting victim of circumstance; a convenient scapegoat for eviscerating the rule of law. The Bush administration has used its extraordinary influence in the media to demagogue the case and keep him locked-away without producing one shred of evidence against him. The entire affair has been a grotesque mockery of justice. The hard-right groups that engineered this plot know exactly where the fault-lines in American jurisprudence lie; in the inalienable protections of its citizens.
Read the rest:
http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/MainPages/News.asp?Type=TRUE&ID=535&Language=English
Note this story was referred to on vive back in July, the link goes to a Common dreams story: http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0705-25.htm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 15, 2005]
Note: http://www.canadianacti...
http://www.commondreams...

Yes Catherine, It is the end of "inalienable rights", the end of The Bill of Rights, and the end of any meaningful notion of personal liberty. Once again we are all being weakened by our present political system, because we give to much power to political parties and not the candidates we elect.
Here in Canada we must take back our "government" and insist those candidates we vote for, either work for the constituents who elect them or start picking their pay check and perks from the parties who control them. Why should we the tax payer continue to pay for party sheep, while people like Paul Martin stroll around they world pretending Canada is a country that respect human right and does not perform acts against humanity.
Let me remind you all again, it was a Liberal "governing" party who in 1966 and 1967 let the Yanks into Canada to test their version of Agent orange and Agent Purple and it is the Liberal Party of Canada who to day over see their very own mess.
Like I said before, Saddam Hussain is behind bars, waiting to have his head chopped off, because he sprayed chemicals on his people in the North Of Iraq, destroying the health of those who lived, so what makes the Liberal Party of Canada any cleaner than Saddam Hussians regeime? Off with the heads of the Liberal Party too, now that would be holding them accountabile !
---
Good government is not a party government
That is why we have to find out exactly what this new legislation coming in the fall is, and what it means to us, and really speak out against it. We know they are wanting to intrude into cell phone calls, internet use etc, but what else and how is this going to affect us? What about the anti-terrorism laws, why do we need them the way they are written? Who's terrorizing who?
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?