Canada and the United States have co-operated in the defence of North
America for over 60 years, most notably through the North American Aerospace
Defence Command (NORAD). With our two countries continuing to work together
to meet new challenges (for example, through the Smart Border Initiative and
the Binational Planning Group), it is prudent to explore whether partnership
in BMD might contribute even further to North American and Canadian
security.
On January 15, 2004, I exchanged Letters of Intent with the US Secretary of
Defense regarding possible Canadian participation in the ballistic missile
defence of North America. The letters do not constitute an agreement between
Canada and the United States on Canadian participation; rather, they set out
an agreed path for negotiations. Also, by facilitating Canadian access to US
planning information, they will help Canada make an informed decision on
participation.
Our decision to explore participation in BMD complements traditional
Canadian efforts in arms control and disarmament. Those co-operative
efforts, whether in the form of diplomacy, export controls, or legal
mechanisms, are all aimed at preventing states from acquiring weapons of
mass destruction and the means of delivering them. Rather than starting new
arms races as some allege, BMD hopes to deter potential missile
proliferators by making it clear to them that expending their scarce
resources on missiles will not buy them any real advantage.
Once talks have been completed, the Government will take a principled
decision based on Canadian interests and values. Any possible participation
in BMD would not be unconditional. Negotiations would preserve Canada's
long-standing policy of opposing the weaponization of space. This government
takes seriously our responsibility to protect Canadian citizens and to
ensure that we have a say in decisions affecting the defence of our people
and territory.
I appreciate being made aware of your views and trust the information I have
provided is helpful.
Yours sincerely,
The Honourable David Pratt, P.C., M.P.
01579-01585-02334-03136
************************
It seems the government doesn't care what Canadians want, they think they are protecting us. Personally, I think if we put missiles on our soil, we automatically become a greater target.
Just my opinion.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Exploration of new armament and armament defences does NOT complement arms control and disarmament. It is the END of our traditional policies.
- Those co-operative efforts, whether in the form of diplomacy, export controls, or legal mechanisms, are all aimed at preventing states from acquiring weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.
This is not diplomacy, export controls or legal mechanisms. It is Weaponization! and it does not stop enemies from producing nuclear missiles, but rather forces them to build better ones.
- Rather than starting new arms races as some allege, BMD hopes to deter potential missile proliferators by making it clear to them that expending their scarce resources on missiles will not buy them any real advantage
See above, and how about spending our own scarce resources on a system that will be to our disadvantage. Apparently Bush has no qualms of spending half a trillion dollars a year of his citizens childrens taxes.
Send off your emails to Pratt letting him know we disaprove
I swear, this Liberal government is Orwell meeting Monty Python!
---
If we are standing still we are moving backwards.
Translation: I couldn't give a crap what your concerns are or what the polls say. We Liberals are your ruling Gods and we shall impose whatever initiative we want on you silly peons.
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
---
If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?
I don't believe there is ANY system that can keep people secure. If people are so damn afraid of being what? Bombed? Shot? Hijacked? Bear Hugged? Tickled to death? Whiplashed? Hit with a puck? Baseball? Toppled off their bikes? ah, bitten by a mosquito, receiving a dusty letter, oh ya, and waking up!!!!! just go jump off a bridge now and let the rest of us LIVE IN PEACE AND FREEDOM!