Liberals Using Tax Dollars To Fund Weapons In Space Advocates

Posted on Friday, November 19 at 11:12 by gina
At issue is James Fergusson, director of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Defence and Security Studies. The centre receives funding from the Department of National Defence’s security and defence forum. The DND program has a budget of $2 million this year, according to the 2004-05 estimates. Fergusson has been commissioned by DND to write several reports on missile defence, including Theatre Missile Defence and 2000 Space Appreciation Report. One report said if Canada says no to missile defence, “it is difficult to see how Canada could continue to participate in other key space-related activities in a joint way with the United States.” His comments are more evidence of the links between missile defence and space, said McDonough. “It is simply dead wrong for Paul Martin to pretend this program is unrelated to space. Missile defence will become Star Wars and has already kick-started an acceleration of the arms race,” she said. “Martin’s position is indefensible and it’s time he told George Bush that Canada won’t help him make the world more dangerous.” In May, Fergusson wrote that space is, “the vital enabler of current and future defence and security operations.” In 2002, he said in a speech, “outer space within the next decade will be the fourth dimension of warfare. It will be more or less weaponized… there are great political benefits to be had if we get out ahead of the curve. Of course the costs are enormous.” Yesterday on CBC Newsworld, he defended the current missile proposal against charges it doesn’t make anyone safe because it doesn’t work. He claimed that five of eight tests had worked without noting the test missile had been painted with a homing beacon, making it easier to hit. In fact, no test has worked without the test missile being painted and the New York Times reported – before the Pentagon cancelled tests – the most recent test missed by 200 miles. -30- For further information, please contact: Ian Capstick, Caucus Press Secretary, 613/720-6400. ****************************************************************************** V. Anthony Salloum Legislative and Communications Assistant - Adjoint Législatif; Adjoint aux communications Alexa McDonough, MP/ Députée Halifax Foreign Affairs and Post-Secondary Education Critic; Porte-parole pour les affaires étrangères et éducation post-secondaire; Tel: (613)995-4492 Fax/Télécopier: (613)992-8569 www.alexahfx.ca

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Nov 19, 2004 8:19 pm
    The missile defence system will protect Canada and keep our space technology workers in the forefront of the industry.

    The government funds all kinds of research into many varied topics, so this study by a professional analyst that recommends Canada sign on to missile defence is no surprise - he at least understands what the program is about, unlike the people who oppose this defence system who demonstrate very little knowledge at all.

    The government is always funding researchers to examine issues that are very complex, not everyone will agree with a professional's opinion but it gives the government some real facts to go on instead of just overheated rhetoric from special interest groups.

  2. Fri Nov 19, 2004 8:57 pm
    "Overheated rhetoric from special interest groups"?

    Were you talking to yourself by any chance dear "Anon"?

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:20 pm
    It would be a shame that Canada jeopardizes its good international fame as a friendly and democratic country by joining the missile defence plan. The BMD protects no one (not even the USA), and Canada can continue its space technology research and “keep space technology workers in the forefront of the industry” simply by continuing to support ESA’s efforts, the ISS, and space R&D for peaceful reasons and advancement of humanity and human knowledge as a whole. As the first paragraph of Article I of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space stipulates: “The exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind.” This is consistent with the Canadian values; and Canadian taxes should support Canadian values.

  4. Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:28 pm
    Yes, maybe missile defense will keep Canadians at the forefront of the space industry, but what kind of industry will that be? Do we want weapons in space, or do we want space to remain an object of international peace and commradery? Do we want to explain to children that that blinking light away up there contains enough weapons to obliterate half the country, or that is it the ISS, the product of years of international cooperation? Keep arms in the arms industry...it's big enough already! Keep science in the space industry.

  5. Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:29 pm
    Yes, maybe missile defense will keep Canadians at the forefront of the space industry, but what kind of industry will that be? Do we want weapons in space, or do we want space to remain an object of international peace and commradery? Do we want to explain to our children that that blinking light away up there contains enough weapons to obliterate half the country, or that it is the ISS, the product of years of international cooperation? Keep arms in the arms industry...it's big enough already! Keep science in the space industry.

  6. Sat Nov 20, 2004 1:03 am
    We don`t have to ride on the coattails of the US and its missile offense program to be innovators and trailblazers.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. by RPW
    Sat Nov 20, 2004 1:10 am
    The ONLY reason that Bay Street wants to sign onto "Missile Defense" is the $$$$ they see dancing like sugar plums before their eyes. And, it won't be Canadian businesses that profit; it will be Yankee subsidiaries, in which Bay St. will buy large share blocks. The profits from this in turn will end up in the Caymans, (or where Martin registers his ships) et al. Research? Not a chance!

    ---
    RickW

  8. Sat Nov 20, 2004 1:46 am
    A NON, you SOUND like a Canadian.

    Are you out of your FREAKING MIND ????


    ---
    "Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan

  9. Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am
    a NON,

    "The missile defence system will protect Canada and keep our space technology workers in the forefront of the industry."

    Is that the same industry that was so anxious that Canada join the Iraq war so that they wouldn't lose their business connections? That same souless, repulsive industry? Oh, my God I'm going to lose my job with an American owned company in Canada if you don't send Canadian troops to go and kill innocent Iraqis. That industry? Ya, that's the group I want making Canada world renouned for.

  10. Mon Nov 22, 2004 5:17 pm
    Paul Martin and his ilk are George .W. Bushs' lap dogs.

  11. Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:57 pm
    The Space treaty is something that will be broken as
    soon as possible and for good reason. Right now
    the treaty does nothing except suppress space exploration.
    For example, suppose the first nation to Mars could
    claim the entire planet. How much is a planet worth?
    Well if you have to share it with "all of mankind"
    not much. In a few decades private space travel,
    even to Mars, will be within reach. At that point
    the space treaty will be toast. Actually it will
    be toast long before that as it's another "feel good"
    treaty. Who the hell is going to enforce it? Law's
    without enforcement regimes are suggestions.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news