At issue is James Fergusson, director of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Defence and Security Studies. The centre receives funding from the Department of National Defence’s security and defence forum. The DND program has a budget of $2 million this year, according to the 2004-05 estimates.
Fergusson has been commissioned by DND to write several reports on missile defence, including Theatre Missile Defence and 2000 Space Appreciation Report. One report said if Canada says no to missile defence, “it is difficult to see how Canada could continue to participate in other key space-related activities in a joint way with the United States.”
His comments are more evidence of the links between missile defence and space, said McDonough. “It is simply dead wrong for Paul Martin to pretend this program is unrelated to space. Missile defence will become Star Wars and has already kick-started an acceleration of the arms race,” she said. “Martin’s position is indefensible and it’s time he told George Bush that Canada won’t help him make the world more dangerous.”
In May, Fergusson wrote that space is, “the vital enabler of current and future defence and security operations.” In 2002, he said in a speech, “outer space within the next decade will be the fourth dimension of warfare. It will be more or less weaponized… there are great political benefits to be had if we get out ahead of the curve. Of course the costs are enormous.”
Yesterday on CBC Newsworld, he defended the current missile proposal against charges it doesn’t make anyone safe because it doesn’t work. He claimed that five of eight tests had worked without noting the test missile had been painted with a homing beacon, making it easier to hit. In fact, no test has worked without the test missile being painted and the New York Times reported – before the Pentagon cancelled tests – the most recent test missed by 200 miles.
-30-
For further information, please contact:
Ian Capstick, Caucus Press Secretary, 613/720-6400.
******************************************************************************
V. Anthony Salloum
Legislative and Communications Assistant - Adjoint Législatif; Adjoint aux communications
Alexa McDonough, MP/ Députée Halifax
Foreign Affairs and Post-Secondary Education Critic; Porte-parole pour les affaires étrangères et éducation post-secondaire;
Tel: (613)995-4492 Fax/Télécopier: (613)992-8569 www.alexahfx.ca
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
The government funds all kinds of research into many varied topics, so this study by a professional analyst that recommends Canada sign on to missile defence is no surprise - he at least understands what the program is about, unlike the people who oppose this defence system who demonstrate very little knowledge at all.
The government is always funding researchers to examine issues that are very complex, not everyone will agree with a professional's opinion but it gives the government some real facts to go on instead of just overheated rhetoric from special interest groups.
Were you talking to yourself by any chance dear "Anon"?
---
"We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"
---
Dave Ruston
---
RickW
Are you out of your FREAKING MIND ????
---
"Arrogance is unacceptable. Do it to my face, and I will react" - Jim Callaghan
"The missile defence system will protect Canada and keep our space technology workers in the forefront of the industry."
Is that the same industry that was so anxious that Canada join the Iraq war so that they wouldn't lose their business connections? That same souless, repulsive industry? Oh, my God I'm going to lose my job with an American owned company in Canada if you don't send Canadian troops to go and kill innocent Iraqis. That industry? Ya, that's the group I want making Canada world renouned for.
soon as possible and for good reason. Right now
the treaty does nothing except suppress space exploration.
For example, suppose the first nation to Mars could
claim the entire planet. How much is a planet worth?
Well if you have to share it with "all of mankind"
not much. In a few decades private space travel,
even to Mars, will be within reach. At that point
the space treaty will be toast. Actually it will
be toast long before that as it's another "feel good"
treaty. Who the hell is going to enforce it? Law's
without enforcement regimes are suggestions.