The answer is later retirement, the Conference Board concludes in a 183-page report, Performance and Potential 2005-06: The World and Canada: Trends Reshaping Our Future.
The board is a non-profit business body. The report is its 10th annual Canadian performance review aimed at identifying what the country can be doing to increase productivity.
"We have at most another 10 years before the accelerating aging of the population begins to undermine economic performance and social well-being," it says.
"After 2010, the baby boomers will begin to retire, and by 2025, 20.4 per cent of the population will be over age 65 — double the share in 1980.... There will be fewer people in the active labour force to support the retiring baby boomers."
Canadian workers are retiring earlier. In 1976, the average retirement age was 65. In 1998, the figure dropped to 61, and now stands at between 61 and 62.
On the longevity scale, Canadians rank high among developed nations, the report says.
"Canada's smoking rate is the lowest of the 24 countries we studied," it says. Similarly, rates of alcohol consumption and obesity proved relatively low, as were death rates from cancer and heart and circulatory diseases.
Despite such statistics, the report ranked Canada 10th in the health category, down from eighth last year.
Acquisition of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) machines and radiation therapy units in Canada lags behind that of other countries, the report says. Canada has 2.1 doctors per 1,000 people, compared with 4.1 in Italy, the top performer in that category.
On the aging workforce question, the Conference Board says a coherent national strategy is needed both to motivate older people to keep working and to motivate employers to retain and hire older workers.
Its recommendations include:
Increase the eligibility age for government pension plans. Citing conclusions of the chief actuary of Canada, the Conference Board says the current system is too generous for retirees who begin collecting between 60 and 65 and penalizes people who continue working past 65.
Combat ageism in the workplace. "In most countries, there are deeply ingrained biases against older workers, and dispelling them is not easy."
Pass laws to eliminate mandatory retirement.
Reduce unemployment and disability benefits to prevent workers from using social security programs as a route to early retirement.
Provide better adult education and training to enhance older workers' employability.
Establish flexible work arrangements to accommodate older workers' health.
Help older workers find jobs through specific government employment services.
Offer subsidies to employers who hire and retain older workers, offsetting higher salaries often commanded by older workers compared with younger ones.
Here's a report that is on the right track. Local solutions for local problems.
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1129585811587
Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

Economic globalization’s chickens are coming home to roost in Canada. It has been called the race to the bottom and, as it implies, it is a race every worker loses.
While Canada is supposed to compete internationally based on its comparative advantage, pressure from corporate lobbyists would have us compete by lowering wages as well. They succeeded with Paul Martin as finance minister. His policies of “labour flexibility” had the desired effect of stagnating real wages for almost a decade.
Youth participation in the labour force has dropped sharply since 1989. Many youth have given up on trying to find work, knowing that the jobs that are available are hardly worth the time and certainly do not provide a living wage. Those people who are working face insecure, part-time or temporary, low paying jobs with few or no benefits and little prospect for improvement. For many, the pay will now be almost lower than minimum wage, and the working conditions will continue to be lousy.
The social consequences of globalization have been devastating. A Health Canada study has described the pace of work in Canada "completely unsustainable." The National Work-Life Conflict Study, released in July, 2002, revealed that in 1992, 38 per cent of the work force was "highly stressed." By 2002, that number was 55 per cent. Family life is “virtually non-existent” said the study, and families are delaying having children, and having fewer of them.
This is the consequence of a neo-liberal ideology that has turned common sense on its head. Thirty years ago full employment and high wages were societal goals and it was simply assumed that the economy served society at large. Today there is no talk of full employment and Canada has the second highest percentage of low wage jobs of any OECD country.
The Conference Board would have us believe that forcing our elders to work even further into their "Golden Years" at low-paying "McJobs" will be the solution to our economic and labour woes. I believe most people in our country would rather make a decent living, enjoy reliable government services and feel secure in their neighbourhoods. The globalist race to the bottom makes that impossible, regardless of any "incentives" they may bestow.