What Happens When NAFTA Is Abrogated?

Posted on Sunday, November 28 at 22:34 by hoopoe
Dear CAP Friends, A number of people are asking and wondering about how Canada will change when NAFTA is abrogated (abolished).

Here is a concise overview in answer to that question.

--- Question: Suppose we were to abrogate NAFTA, what would happen and what would we do next?

Answer: Apart from the inevitable anger on the part of the U.S. government there would be very little, if any, immediate consequence of significance. There are two possible scenarios.

Case I: Canada would immediately offer to negotiate a Fair Trade Agreement with the U.S. and Mexico which would maintain the status quo on tariffs, dispute settlement mechanisms, etc. but which would not include the unacceptable “national treatment” clause on investment, the energy sharing provisions, etc.

If the U.S. and Mexico agreed, trade would not be affected but Canada would have regained the right to reinstate the Foreign Investment Review Agency which would be able to screen foreign investment and apply conditions as well as limits on the level of foreign ownership acceptable in any industrial or resource sector. We would encourage foreign investment but only when it would be of benefit to Canada. Jobs would not be lost and might even be enhanced if we stop selling companies that are subsequently downsized or shut down completely. In sum we would regain control of our own destiny. (Existing investment is not affected.)

Case II: In the event that the U.S. and Mexico refused to sign Fair Trade Agreements, Canada would revert to reliance on the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) which served us so well before the FTA was signed.

We would then rely on the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.

Our tariff advantage with the U.S. prior to 1988 would be re-instated.

We would achieve the same investment advantage that we are seeking vis-ŕ-vis the U.S.

The only negative – which might turn out to be a positive for Canada in repatriating some of its talent – would be that the TN Visas under NAFTA would not be renewed when they expire.

N.B. Under both scenarios Canada should ensure that it doesn't give away more sovereignty under the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) which the Liberal government is in the process of doing.

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:08 pm
    A realistic scenario would be higher unemployment and an even lower standard of living. The Europeans recognize the value of free trade - that's why they formed the EU. Canada has benefitted greatly from free trade and so has the United States. We would all be better off with a Customs Union with the US - that way our politicians and their politicians would be less able to interfere and diminish our respective economies.

  2. Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:15 pm
    But they EU plays nice with each other.

    Perhaps, since Quebec is right next to Greenland, and thereby Denmark by proxy; Canada could join the EU as well?



    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  3. by N Say
    Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:49 pm
    nothing would happen if we killed NAFTA/FTA; we;d just start using the GATT rules which we've always done. I don't know what the point of NAFTA is anyway, if Canada & the US are already members of the WTO. Here's a good reason to kill NAFTA though, given by a US trade negotiator who worked for Clayton Yeutter: <P> <i>"We have achieved a major liberalization of the investment climate in Canada and imbedded it permanently so that in the future Canada's investment policies cannot retrogress to the old policies of the FIRA and NEP... The vast bulk of US direct investment in Canada now will go forward with no Canadian government interference whatsoever. <P> There is broad agreement to assure the freest possible bilateral trade in energy, including nondiscriminatory access for the US to Canadian energy supplies... Essentially, in the text we got everything we wanted."</i><p>---<br>"We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men" - George Orwell

  4. Tue Nov 30, 2004 1:47 am
    Anon. Are you on glue? FTA and NAFTA have hurt both Canada and the USA! It has nothing to do with 'free trade.' These were only investment agreements whereby foreign companies can come in and control the Canadian economy without creating Canadian jobs. Before the treasonous NAFTA, foreign corporations, even American ones, had to have a Canadian head office, which also created high paying executive jobs in Canada. Not only did this disappear after 'free trade' but so did the profit reporting and tax accountability of foreign corporations. Now they transfer their Canadian profits to their American headquarters, and subsequently, are not taxed fairly! This hurts Canadian society on the whole. And when corporations can sue various levels of government for 'lost profit' under NAFTA, well, that`s just criminal! This prevents governments from doing what citizens elect them to do- forge progressive policy! And the energy clause of NAFTA, where we must send the same amount of oil, gas, etc. to the USA even if our own domestic supply is dwindling. The Canadians responsible for agreeing to this, were definitely on glue! Nope, we`ve seen jobs get up and go, never to return.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  5. by hoopoe
    Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:07 pm
    Apparently, you didn't even read the above article and you obviously do not know what is actually in this investment agreement masquerading as a trade agreement. If you did you would see we have already gone back to using GATT because the Americans don't respect the rulings handed out under NAFTA that support us. <p>Maybe you can enlighten us as to exactly what benefit we got from NAFTA instead of just making a bunch of statements and expect them to stand without any logical argument to back them up never mind actually resorting to facts to do so. In short, this agreement is like this: Canada gave up all ability to regulate American ownership of and functioning of our major industries all for the benefit of operating under the same trade rules as we had before (GATT) and the same American disregard for those same rules. Given this <b>fact</b>, I really don't see why someone has to be such an idiot on this topic. I can only conclude that you are stubbornly holding to an ideologically dogmatic point of view and incapable of using your brain to figure things out or you are benefitting financially from this agreement somehow and don't care about your country's very existence as long as it means making an extra buck for yourself.

  6. by rcd
    Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:10 am
    Anon...the problem with that logic is that in NAFTA, the US economy is more than 10 x larger than that of Canada and Mexico, hardly a level playing field; while the EU is made up of many states with a dichotomy of economies that are relatively close to each other in economic output. Based on what I have seen from NAFTA and FTA from Canada's persepctive, give me the EU any day.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news