Updating the figures in my book The Vanishing Country, during the same period of time, the foreign direct investment tracked by Investment Canada amounted to to an enormous $540.4 billion. Of that amount, 96.8% was for takeovers, and only a pathetic 3.2% was for new business investment.
And David Emerson wants more of the same!
Bear in mind that of the $540.4 billion, about two thirds to three quarters came not from outside the country but from our good old loyal, patriotic financial institutions, mostly our Big 5 banks, here in Canada. We have to say "about," because for unknown reasons, Statistics Canada stopped keeping track of such information. My estimates are based on historical figures.
When we closed down the Committee For An Independent Canada back in 1981, foreigners were in control of about 24% of corporate revenue. It's now back at well over 30% and increasing. As well, about 37% of our largest 500 corporations
are already foreign-controlled.
To get a better grasp of what is happening in Canada (and only if you have a strong stomach) go to the Industry Canada site shown above, click on Decisions, and scroll through a couple of months of recent takeovers. It's truly disgusting.
It's interesting to view all of this considering the Ipsos/Reid poll showing that 70% of Canadians say that they are concerned about the foreign ownership of Canada's energy resources (already over 50% in the petroleum industry and headed for a big increase), and considering other similar polls.
And isn't it great that Petro-Canada, the CNR, Air Canada, Molson's, Labatt's, and Tim Horton's are all majority-foreign-owned? That's to name just a few. And isn't it great that over 125 Canadian high-tech companies have been taken over in the Ottawa area alone in recent years?
As for David Emerson's claim of the rigorous screening of takeover applications, not one single application has ever been rejected. How the dim-witted people in Ottawa could ever accept the takeovers of Westcoast Energy or Connaught Laboratories (as but two of thousands of similarly egregious examples) is beyond all logical explanation (except the dim-witted one).
Our deep integration sellouts keep saying that we don't have enough foreign investment and we should open up telecommunications, airlines, banking, book publishing, etc. and etc. and etc. Not enough compared to where? As a percentage of GDP we have three times as much foreign direct investment as they do in the U.S, and while we have dozens of industries majority-foreign-owned, in the U.S. THERE IS NOT ONE.
So, just who are these people who want to continue and accelerate the sale of Canada? They are, of course, Tom d'Aquino and the CCCE, the big chartered banks led by the Royal Bank of Canada (sorry RBC), the big foreign oil companies, the so-called think tanks who are funded by all of the above - The C.D. Howe and Fraser Institutes, the IRPP (Chairman Bob Rae!), and that awful Allan Gotlieb's American-financed Donner Institue that passes out hundreds of thousands of dollars to Fraser, The Atlantic Institute etc. They are people such as John Manley, Gordon Nixon, Paul Tellier, Derek Burney, Michael Wilson, Wendy Dobson and other Brian Mulroney buddies. They are the whole crew who frequently visit Washington as though they officially represent the will of the Canadian people, while the public opinion polls show, poll after poll, year after year, that the vast majority of Canadians want nothing to do with their deep integration, NAFTA-Plus, Big-Idea, Grand-Bargain, truly disgusting treachery.
Of course we also know that Paul Martin sides with Emerson et al. With his sure-to-be-apologetic mea culpa mind-frame, his upcoming meeting with Bush and Fox could be disastrous. We already know the American energy, foreign ownership, and military integration agendas.
Too bad Martin doesn't have the courage to use our Canadian energy exports, our pipeline land corridors, etc., to demand an end to the grossly unfair American softwood and beef punishment of Canada.
A 27% export tariff on oil, gas, uranium and electricity exports to the U.S. combined with notification of an Arctic pipeline slowdown would do the job nicely, and quickly.
Mel Hurtig
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 21, 2005]
tilted Liberal Party.Even if he understood.he is incapable of doing anything.
Great explanation and update by Mel Hurtig who is on top of things and keeps us posted.
Thanks again Mel,
Robert G. Mac Donald.B.A.M.D.
Canadian Patriot
Why? It must not be coming from him. They obviously told him to shut up.
---
The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.
- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat
<br />
In fact, I would take issue with the $540 billion figure. Statscan does measure foreign direct investment, and at the end of 2004, foreign direct investment in Canada amounted to $367.9 billion (<a href="http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050316/d050316a.htm">http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050316/d050316a.htm</a>).<br />
<br />
On the topic of international investment flows, the same report from statscan notes that Canadian investment abroad is $438.4 billion. In other words, Canadians invest more outside of Canada than foreigners invest inside of Canada. This means that we own more of the rest of the world than they own of us.<br />
<br />
I did take a look at the decision record that was referenced in the article, and I will be able to keep my lunch down. Among the evil transactions: ING Insurance Company of Canada (its home warranty business), Toronto, ON has been sold to American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, North York, Ontario, CDA (USA). Am I to be upset if the subsidiary of a Dutch form (albeit located in Canada) is sold to an American firm? How about the sale of Milwaukee Electric Tool (Canada) Ltd., Scarborough, ON to A&M Industries S.a.r.l., Luxembourg, LUX (HKC)? Am I really supposed to loose sleep if an American controlled firm located in Canada is sold to Hong Kong-controlled interests located in Luxembourg? Were there supposed to be Canadian bidders for the Milwaukee Electric Tool company?<br />
<br />
Canada is a successful country and despite these Chicken Little predictions of our imminent demise, we can compete among the best in the world. What about the success of RIM? What about the success (yes, success) of Bombardier, which was able to buy Lear jet a few years back. Lets not forget our dominance of the US culture sector (Norman Jewison et.al.).<br />
Mel is pointing out - for as bad as it is now - it is about to get a whole lot worse. When you hang by a thread - it eventually breaks.
As for movies, the market in Canada is 50 billion, and much leaves the country due to the foreign ownership of distributors such as Pararmount owned Famous Players, Odeon Films and Cineplex Odeon, and AMC.....
---
The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.
- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat
<br />
There are some very real things that threaten the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Canada (such as the ability to project any influence over the North West Passage). The sale of Milwaukee Electric Tool Ltd. is not one of them.<br />
investment abroad is actually the foreign owned,
Canadian industries investing abroad. It might be
financially beneficial to be investing abroad from
Canada.
And are we sure it is not Canadian branch plant profits
going back to the US HQ? (Perchance without paying
taxes here?)
This expansion they are talking about will allow foreigners to buy up whatever last vestiges of industries/companies that escaped earlier trade deals.
If it comes down to deciding losing sovereignty over the far north or seeing millions of Canadians five years from now freezing every winter because of the price of natural gas (due to the guaranteed clause amounts), I would take warm and feed over the artic thanks. We should not have to ever make such a choice but those choices are being forced upon us. BTW - the Artic is being enforced - it was just announced last week that exercises were taking place up there. Did we get any announcements that the 60% clause will be overturned in times of extreme shortage or price hikes? Nope and we never will either with mealy mouthed responses to it.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
If a foreign corporation or individual profits mightily from its presence in Canada, we should demand that ALL Canadians receive substantial benefits. Otherwise, why allow it? This means much higher real wages, vastly improved public pensions, an unemployment insurance system that protects all unemployed regardless of circumstances, defined benefit pensions for corporate workers mandated by tough laws, the end of the health care privatization scam, etc.
No one would care if we privatized everything, as long as the the same number of people (or more) could find good jobs at the same or better wages, and the same services remained universally available. It's the idiotology and the greed, not the ownership, that causes the problems.
The reason many rail against foreign ownership is because these new owners tend to impose the ugly business models and philosophies of their own countries on Canada, and claim that they cannot survive here without them. Our compromised neo-con governments buy into this lie with relish, and its always the "ordinary" folk who have to accept less and pay more, in order to guarantee the huge profits of these foreigners.
I believe that everybody should be welcome in Canada, provided that they play by our rules and contribute. If they don't, no matter how enticing they appear, in the end we don't need them, and they do us much more harm than good. Right wingers splutter about socialism and discredited ideas and the past and blah, blah, blah. But this is not Russia and that's twittering, nattering nonsense. Worse still, its a lie. It's time
we recognized it as such. The society of more for the few and less for the many should not be welcome here.
We in Canada are ENORMOUSLY FORTUNATE. Our good fortune was built on sharing and decency. We would be the greatest fools of all time if we let it slip away to raving dog-eat-dog greed for nothing. These are our issues. Who owns the buildings or the plants, or even where the products or profits go doesn't matter nearly as much.
We buy 19 billion worth of cars with no R & D until the recent GM plan.....transfer prcing is also a problem.
---
The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.
- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat
Ed Deak Big Lake, BC.