Ottawa Should Borrow To Rebuild Infrastructure

Posted on Tuesday, March 16 at 22:52 by whelan costen
Under their plan - released by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives one week before the official federal budget - Ottawa would raise $5 billion annually by issuing bonds to finance and direct a massive new infrastructure program.

By keeping that debt on the public books, rather than hidden away in public-private partnerships, the spending will be much more transparent to Canadians who have become nervous about closed-door deals, said Ellen Russell, economist with the centre.

Ottawa should borrow to rebuild infrastructure: alternative budget

Note: Ottawa should borrow to...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:54 pm
    Paying down the debt makes no economic sense when our infrastructure is crumbling.

    Yes, it has to be dealt with someday, but only as long as we don't slip back into the curse of deficit financing on the scale we saw in the 70's and 80's.

    When our economy goes into boom mode, we pay down some debt, when we see our social programs disappear, we need to address that before debt reduction.

    The more people earn, the more they pay in taxes, so it makes sense to allow citizens to earn as much as possible. Tax revenues pay the bills, so what is it the government doesn't get ??

    Remember, the wealthy save money, the lower and middle class spend money.

    Which is better for the economy ?

    The answer is clear.



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  2. Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:23 pm
    And what about money reform?

  3. Wed Mar 17, 2004 11:06 pm
    HELL, tax the rich, and the corporations more, and the government must also take back control over printing money! This is interest free money for whatever we need it for!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  4. Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:01 am
    It's not really THAT simple. The economics behind lowering the taxes for the rich make sense too. It's Friedman's economics again (I HATE how he keeps popping up).

    You and I say "The poor spend the money and the rich save it, so tax the rich and employ the poor."

    Friedman says "The rich save their money by reinvesting it, which creates jobs. So cut taxes to the rich."

    Don't get me wrong; I'm not saying he's right. Friedman's economic theory is based on a series of complex equations with no limitations. Anyone with a few years of university mathematics can prove what is quite obvious to the layman: that perpetual growth is impossible. Actually, some experts claim it IS possible through genetically altered crops, etc. But it seems that the people with the LEAST faith in technology's ability to keep a step ahead of nature are the engineers. Professional engineering societies have lobbied educational institutions to teach students about sustainability. Anyways, I'm off on a tangent again.

    ---

    Kory Yamashita

    "What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." - Oliver Wendell Holmes
    "As for the futur

  5. Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:16 pm
    Actually, it is that simple. It`s not hard at all. Just DO IT. Cutting taxes for the rich and the corporations doesn`t guarantee that they`re going to create jobs with that added wealth. Years ago, corporate and wealth taxes were higher, and guess what? They were STILL RICH! Friedman was your typical retro conservative economist, who advocated that governments give up their money making function and let the private banks do it. He was wrong about that too! That`s what caused skyrocketing debt in so many countries!

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news