CAP Leader Comments On Secret Agenda Of NAU Meeting In Banff

Posted on Tuesday, September 19 at 22:55 by whelan costen
The definition of the criminal act of treason in Canada requires the use of "force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province." S. 46 (2) (a) Criminal Code of Canada. The individuals identified below are, hence, arguably, not guilty of treason as defined under Canada 's Criminal Code. On the other hand, Black's Law Dictionary defines Traitor as "One who, being trusted, betrays; one guilty of treason." It is clear that the individuals identified below were trusted and are betraying us. They are certainly guilty of conspiring to remove from us the rights and privileges that belong to the citizens of Canada and which flow from our Canadian Constitution. The same can be said for the impact on the citizens of the USA and Mexico. The sitting and former representatives from the Liberal Party of Canada as well as the Conservative Party of Canada are clearly identifiable, including Conservative Party Ministers and Deputy Ministers of the Government of Canada, and of some provinces, as well as the former Liberal Deputy Prime Minister of Canada, John Manley, and former Liberal Minister of Justice Anne McLellan. It is unclear if any representatives from the NDP or the Bloq Quebecois were present.... Contact Connie Fogal at 604 872 2128 or e-mail conniefogal@telus.net www.canadianactionparty.ca Story link Ms Fogal is refering to "Deep Integration Planned at Secret Conference Ignored by the Media" : http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060919132553106 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 20, 2006]

Note: www.canadianactionparty.ca http://www.vivelecanada...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:28 am
    And the media says

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  2. Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:38 am
    Exactly! Where is the media? Where is the discussion? But also, where are the Liberals, Conservative, Bloc, NDP, Greens? I have not heard or read any comments from any other party regarding the NAU.

    I have sent this information to several members of each party, so we'll see if any answer. Shouldn't this be a question for the Liberal Leadership debates?

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:23 am
    <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=North_American_Union/Articles_%26_Commentary_2005">North American Union/Articles & Commentary 2005</a> <br><br> <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=North_American_Union/Articles_%26_Commentary_January-June_2006">North American Union/Articles & Commentary January-June 2006</a> <br><br> <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=North_American_Union/Articles_%26_Commentary_July-December_2006">North American Union/Articles & Commentary July-December 2006</a>

  4. by avatar Milton
    Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:47 am
    Good post Catherine. Good links rearguard.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news