US Ambassador Knows His Script

Posted on Saturday, January 28 at 12:55 by Eleanor
Richard Sanders puts it this way: "When Pres. George W. Bush visited Canada in Dec. 2004 he used 3 public forums to urge Canada to join America's expansive weapons development programme. This had the effect of driving home the illusion that Canada was not already on board. It also gave Martin the welcome opportunity to please voters by pretending to stand up to the Americans. "This is an age-old game. The American administration knows all too well, that their allies sometimes have to feign opposition to US policies in order to gain or retain domestic political support. Such oppositional play-acting does not, therefore, undermine US goals. On the contrary, because duplicitous trickery of this variety can strengthen the domestic standing of one's closest friends, such fakery is tolerated and even encouraged." In this light, we should see this week's little row about the northwest passage as a mark of American APPROVAL of the new government. Eleanor P.S. Richard Sanders is a seasoned scholar of Canadian defense policy and the arms trade, and heads the Ottawa group Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade (COAT). GET his magazine: Press for Conversion! It was Sanders who also brought us the news that the Canada Pension Plan is investing in war industies. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 29, 2006]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:12 pm
    Rattle the sabre with one hand and hold the hand of the foe in the other. It's the old shell game and we Canadians are shocked for a few minutes when we discover we've been duped. Canadians have accepted this as normal.

  2. Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:19 pm
    I respect Richard's work, but not here. This is all too tin-foil hat material for me.

    Harper and his government are in a minority position, they are essentially powerless to do what they really want. They must do everything to the letter and appease most Canadians in the time they have before another election sets them back to opposition status.

    By putting the party behind enforcing Canadian claims in the Arctic, he also sets his party up for a huge fall if they do not produce. They ran on the "stand for Canada" election slogan, and some voted for them just for that. Canadians have an established track record of punishing parties who do not act in our best interest. The Conservatives know that better than the Liberals - can you say demolished down to two seats?

    As for the Americans putting their noses in our business - this is hardly new as it has been going on since confederation.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  3. Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:29 am
    I hope you're right, but I'm worried about how much gets done without any vote in Parlt any more. Behind the scenes they'll carry on the Liberal record of deep integration (that the public doesn't even KNOW about) and they'll add to it by giving away our water, dismantling the Wheat Board, upping our participation in missile defense, and sending forces to wherever the US starts its next adventure. No Act of Parliament is required to do any of these - and the media don't even discuss it.
    E.

  4. Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:27 pm
    What's sad is that Canadians leaders need to feign anti-Americanism in order to pander to insecure Canadians.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news