Even after controversy erupted over the situation last month, the Harper government was evasive and unco-operative, dismissing detailed reports of torture as mere "allegations of the Taliban." This dismissive approach was echoed by Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente who made clear that her sympathies lay with Canadian military leaders, not with Afghans who reported being hung upside down and punched so hard their teeth fell out.
"I have deep sympathy for our military leaders," wrote Wente, explaining what she saw as the difficult bind our generals are in. "They can fight a war. Or they can babysit `our detainees' ..."
To Wente, ensuring that our detainees aren't tortured a requirement of the Geneva Conventions, which Canada has signed is the equivalent of "babysitting" them.
Then there was our top general, Rick Hillier, whose fingerprints are all over the original deal, and who made light of the furor last week by diligently trying to divert attention onto the flashy arrival of the Stanley Cup and a group of NHL old-timers in Kandahar.
First stop for the hockey celebrities was the local Tim Horton's that Hillier famously brought to Afghanistan. Sadly, it seems Hillier's taste for Canadian traditions doesn't necessarily extend beyond hockey and doughnuts to include respect for human rights and the rule of law.
Surely it doesn't need to be noted that torture is among the lowest forms of human depravity. While it has lost its acceptability in civilized circles in recent centuries, it's made a disturbing revival under U.S. President George W. Bush.
Invoking the atrocities of 9/11 as a justification as if there were no atrocities on this scale in history the Bush administration has demonstrated a comfort level with torture that would befit the most brutal medieval king.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/212709
Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

<br />
Afghanistan and Iraq; it's the same war, argues David Orchard and Michael Mandel in this article that was censored by vivelecanada. I contributed this article twice earlier this week, but it was for some reason rejected. It's an important read, that ties right into your posting 4canada.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_24450.shtml">http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_24450.shtml</a><br />
<br />
Did it show up in the "What's new | stories" section? Not everything gets the prime spot. Try posting in the forum section, and if something is censored, let us (the membership) know.
"It's an important read"
The Afghanistan war should be shoved in our faces every day until we get angry or guilty enough to do something about ending Canadian involvement.
It does seem that despite the importance of the Afghanistan war with respect to Canada, related stories seem to get a low key placement.
<br />
It was posted, here:<br />
<a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20070503193508820">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20070503193508820</a><br />
<br />
If you see me posting in here, then it's a safe bet that there's no censorship going on.<br />
Thank you for pointiong it out
for me rearguard.
One may ask, if this government is known to be ruthless and torturers, why is it that they are being supported by the militaries. If this is the government being enshrined and not trusted to deal with prisoners, why does this facade continue? How on earth can the military ever be withdrawn if they can't trust the government they are protecting?
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
LOL
As Rearguard points out, it was posted. In fact, I emailed you after you posted it 3 times. %^)
And . . . .censorship comes from Government, not private individuals.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
Censorship also comes from private citizens, right?
think of the editors at all corporate media offices.
It's called censorship by omission.
"It's called censorship by omission."
No, it isn't. You can't walk into a private citizens home and start yelling your head off about the things that bother you. That is 'tresspass'. The MSM is also private industry for the most part.
They buy ink by the barrell, it's their printing press. You can't call 'censorship' because your interests and theirs don't meet. Just like Vive.
We try to be as open minded as we can, but when it comes down to it, we have a stated mission and may choose not to publish or reprint stories outside that scope. You can call that 'censorship by omission', but it does your cause no good.
If you want your unhindered message out - get your own printing press and start laying type. It's what the founder of Vive did.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.