Buttar is also angry about steep fees for public events. Entrance to each of the nine balls costs $150 US and the best viewing seats along the parade route run $125.
"If you don't have a lot of money, Bush has no time for you. It's just an affirmation of his policies as president, like tax cuts for the wealthy that hurt average Americans."
Criticism of the 55th inaugural has mounted in recent days, with newpaper editorials and some politicians questioning the optics of a national extravaganza while U.S. soldiers don't have all the equipment they need, the country is running a record deficit and tsunami victims in Asia are suffering.
Others question the inaugural committee's efforts to pay for much of the pagentry with donations from wealthy corporations, saying it raises troubling questions about their access to the White House.
But Republicans say it's preferable that taxpayers aren't footing the bill. And they've taken pains to highlight the military with a tribute Tuesday to kick off events and a new commander-in-chief ball Thursday for 2,000 soldiers who have either served in Iraq or Afghanistan or will soon be deployed.
After Bush in sworn in at the Capitol on Thursday at noon and gives his inaugural address, members of the military will form his official escort for the parade to the White House that will include thousands of soldiers and is expected to attract some 500,000 spectators.
"This year, we are (especially) honouring the men and women that are serving our country overseas and at home in our military," said Kevin Sheridan, who's on the inaugural committee.
"But it is a celebration overall of freedom and our democracy."
Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner sent Bush a letter last week suggesting that the inaugural money should be spent on troops in Iraq.
"Precedent suggests that inaugural festivities should be muted, if not cancelled, in war-time," he wrote, noting that $40 million US would buy a lot of military equipment or provide a $290 bonus for each soldier in Iraq.........
www.canada.com/national/story.html?id=e255e32b-e60f-4b74-a54a-6e404f248656
Surely the anti-war protesters should pool the money they're going to spend protesting and send a bunch of themselves to Iraq instead?
That would demonstrate that they have the courage of their convictions! They could chain themselves to the front doors of those places where they hack the heads off aid workers and truck drivers - protecting those establishments from American attack!
A noble cause indeed!
---
Brett Mann
---
Canada for Canadians
I'm glad someone sees what I'm trying to shine a light on.
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
It's understandable why he is doing this though. If I were spending forty Billion of your hard earned dollars to throw myself a party, I wouldn't invite you and I'd want to make sure you couldn't crash it either. It is also understandable why he feels he must have a grand inauguration. He has to convince himself that his people love him and he has to make sure it's a beautifully orchestrated occasion, one that will eclipse the painful memories of his subjects pelting his limo with eggs.
---
Canada for Canadians
The US is also doing a lot of hard work democratizing former fascist dictatorships like Iraq and Afghanistan - that's not isolation, that's an active role in making the world a better and safer place for millions of people.
Now if they could reform the corrupt United Nations and get them to do their job - that would be even more progressive.
---
Canada for Canadians