• Clifford Lincoln, who in 1988 resigned from the Quebec government for its use of the notwithstanding clause. He famously said “rights are rights are rights. There is no such thing as inside rights and outside rights. No such thing as rights for the tall and rights for the short. No such thing as rights for the front and rights for the back, rights for the east and rights for the west. Rights are rights and will always be rights. There are no partial rights.”
• The Little Sisters bookstore in downtown Vancouver fought for over 10 years against unfair censorship by Canada Customs. Although the Supreme Court found in Little Sisters’ favour, Canada Customs did not stop harassing them. When Little Sisters applied for advance funding to take Canada Customs back to court, the Supreme Court turned them down, ruling that such funding was available only in the rarest of cases.
• Harbhajan Singh, who along with six other Sikh individuals successfully fought for the right of refugee claimants, culminating in a 1985 Supreme Court ruling that the Charter applies to all, including foreign nationals. The ruling resulted in the establishment of the Immigration Refugee Board.
• Delwin Vriend, who was fired because he was gay at a time when Alberta’s human rights legislation offered no protection to gay, lesbian or bisexual people. Because of this, he couldn’t even make a claim with the province’s human rights commission. The Supreme Court ruled that no disadvantaged minority group could be excluded from human rights protection.
• The Council of Canadians with Disabilities, who on March 23, 2007 succeeded in having the Supreme Court order VIA Rail to make all its trains accessible to Canadians with disabilities.
"I care deeply about the Charter rights and freedoms of all Canadians, including lesbian, gay, bi and trans people, immigrants, women, people with disabilities and others who have
suffered prejudice and discrimination,” said Adriane Carr, Deputy Leader. “These rights must be protected not only in principle, but in practice. For example, the government should help pay Little Sisters’ legal bills so they can go forward with what is clearly a very important case.”
“As a gay man, I’m so proud of the Green Party of Canada’s record of supporting the Charter and human rights,” said Laurie Arron, Executive Director. “In 1996, the Green Party of Canada became the first federal political party to officially support the inclusion of same-sex couples in civil marriage. Then, as now, the Green Party was ahead of the crowd.”
“Unfortunately, our precious Charter rights and freedoms are now in question,” said Ms. May. “With the government’s cancellation of funding for the Court Challenges Program and the Law Commission of Canada, most Canadians simply can’t afford to take their challenges forward. Our rights and freedoms are only as real as our ability to enforce them.”
http://www.greenparty.ca/en/releases/16.04.2007
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 18, 2007]
Note: http://www.greenparty.c...

Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to
such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society. "
makes further examination of the Charter very important - perhaps there
needs to be explanation and definitions of this entire sentence (clause) -
do we know what defines a society as free and democratic? And what is
reasonable? And as you mention 'prescribed by law'? Laws made by whom and
under the influence of which political system?
I think that we owe ourselves some examination of this document - what it
appears to be may not be what it is? We may be accepting something based
on principal, thinking that we have civil rights protected but when we
examine it closer we find that it has the customary loop holes.
When I read the government booklet called, 'The Constitution and You'
printed in 1982 - chapter 4 says in part; 'Constitutional entrenchment of a
Charter of Rights and Freedoms limits the power of both provincial and
federal governments in favour of the right of individual citizens. It gives
people the power to appeal to the courts if they feel their rights have been
infringed or denied....' however if the case in the article which says that the
Supreme Court denied funding for a case...then we can have the power, but
the courts will determine if we have the means...so this clearly contradicts
itself does it not? Also it reinforces that concept that the courts have the final
say in whether your rights have been denied and that as we know can be
based on the government of the day - which returns us to the idea of 'limits
the power of both the provincial and federal governments in favour of the
right of the individual....'
---
"aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.
The Green party would:
a. Stop any and all bulk water exports by renegotiating or saying no to trade deals that allow corporations to strip our watersheds of freshwater and disrupt entire ecosystems.
b. Amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to enshrine the right of future Canadians to an ecological heritage that includes breathable air and drinkable water.
c. Restore ecosystem health to Canada's coastline and inland watersheds by funding improvements to municipal wastewater treatment systems, with particular emphasis on ensuring shoreline communities and industries stop dumping untreated waste into rivers, lakes and oceans.
Sounds great, but will be completely meaningless if it is ...
... subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Who owns 'Canada'? If Canadians don't have the right to own property, can we own our own country and therefore enforce protection of it?
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.