Canadians Sending Giant Water Bomber To California

Posted on Thursday, October 25 at 10:02 by N Say
The Martin Mars "is much larger and will add immensely to the capability and the potential to save structures down here," he said. The fires could be larger than the ones that devastated the San Diego region in 2003, said Luque. "We thought we saw the last of fires of that magnitude but we definitely have that here." In 2003, fires destroyed 2,406 homes and killed 16 people, including a firefighter. The call for the water bomber's assistance had been anticipated and plans were in place to dispatch it, said Coulson in an interview yesterday. "It's been wild, the last couple of days, trying to get organized here," Coulson said. "I've been down with San Diego fire department four times in the last five weeks working ... on placing the Mars down there for the Santa Anas." Coulson and his staff have worked out plans with the San Diego Fire Department and Congressman Duncan Hunter's office, Coulson said. "We're ahead of the game, we've flown into a bunch of the water reservoirs down there so we have a sense of where we're going to go." A tractor-trailer used for specialized maintenance and a fuel truck left for San Diego on Monday. Crews at the Sproat Lake base worked all night Monday into yesterday to prepare the aircraft for the job, said Coulson. Since purchasing the two Martin Mars water bombers from TimberWest in April 2007, Coulson has used only one aircraft at a time and operations were downsized as a result. .... http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=33a140eb-b325-4630-9bd7-8473bbd16e71&k=10642 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Mars [Proofreader’s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 25, 2007]

Note: http://www.canada.com/v... http://en.wikipedia.org...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by crh
    Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:50 pm
    I can't understand the misuse of the word 'Canadian' in the title to this article. As far as I know, this plane is privately owned and operated. At the time, Gordon Campbell declined to purchase these water bombers on behalf of the citizens of the province. It is Mr. Coulson alone who should get any kind of kudos for sending this plane to California. Although, I am sure his company will be paid the going rate for their services rendered, as in any business transaction.

    No need to feel good about being a good Canadian on this one people.

  2. by Rural
    Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:56 pm
    I know very little about forest fires or fighting them but it seems to me, looking on from a safe distance, that a speedy response with a maximum impact would do much to stop or slow down these fires before they get out of hand. "Crews at the Sproat Lake base worked all night Monday into yesterday to prepare the aircraft for the job, said Coulson." Assuming there was a need in BC would it take 24hrs to get them on the job? Would not a few drops on a small outbreak at the start be a better use of resorces?
    As I say I realy dont know, just asking!


    ---
    When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp

  3. Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:09 am
    Actually these planes are in mothballs waiting to be sold. The forest company that owns them, don't want them. They are to expensive to maintain and used rarely. The crews on standby would take twenty four to get everything back in motion again. The mission may be more for publicity to show their capabilities to perspective buyers.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  4. Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:25 am
    If the US gov spent only a minuscule fraction of their annual military budget on fire fighting and prevention, at best there'd be no fire and at worst they'd be able to put it out all by themselves.

    I say let the fools burn.

  5. Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:28 pm
    On the contrary - the problem is that fire is a natural process, and we've been putting out forest fires for too long when we should just let them burn.

    Now there is too much fuel, and they burn so hot that they do far more damage than nature intended.

    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.

  6. Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:32 pm
    Yeah that too, but if you're going to let fires burn naturally next to inhabited areas, you'll need to make sure that they don't burn out of control, and that means you need to spend some money on it. Bush has diverted funds away from fire fighting and prevention (among other things) to pay for his failed war in Iraq.

  7. Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:04 pm
    I guess "Homeland Security" doesn't apply to firefighting or hurricane relief. It only applies to to harassing innocent citizens.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news