At the same time that Harper was in the news for his trip to Cancun, the government of Portugal was wondering why we were deporting illegal workers from their country. In meetings with Peter MacKay, Portugal's minister of state and foreign affairs, Diogo Freitas do Amaral asked for leniency for Portugese citizens who had been in Canada illegally for several years.
While MacKay assured Portugese officials that there hadn’t been a policy change, the Conservatives campaigned on increased deportations in the recent election. The Liberal Party had previously spoken of a general amnesty for illegal immigrants who had been contributing to Canadian society for years.
We have heard for years about the presence in Canada of highly trained professionals who are driving cabs because, although they came here to work, their credentials are not acceptable in Canada. It appears that immigration officials have been concentrating on poaching professionals from developing nations. The practice of actively recruiting the best and brightest from developing nations is something that should stop, since it leaves those nations short of the very people they need if they are to address their many problems. The practice of poaching those people under false pretenses is truly reprehensible though. If their credentials are not acceptable in Canada, that needs to be made clear to them before they come here.
The Harper government appears to have little grasp of the complexity of the many immigration issues facing Canada. That should not be the case, but the almost purposeful ignorance of the Conservative Party in immigration issues was apparent when they were in opposition and is becoming a national embarrassment now that they are in power.
This should come as no surprise. The shortcomings of Stephen Harper and his party in this matter was demonstrated quite clearly during the “Strippergate” non-scandal that centred around Judy Sgro. The Ethics Commissioner found Sgro to be not quite innocent but not quite guilty in that case and, except for some partisan sniping, the issue died. The Conservatives, then in opposition, could have used the case to address the larger issue of temporary visas, guest workers, and how our system leaves workers in the country through such programs open to abuse by their employers.
They may have even gone further and begun to question why we make it so difficult and expensive for working people, be they exotic dancers, agricultural workers, or tradespeople to come to Canada on a permanent basis.
The Conservative Party and their friends in the mainstream press chose to concentrate on the fact that the worker in question was an exotic dancer. Instead of latching on to a legitimate issue, Harper and his party chose to dive into the gutter for some cheap political points through scandal-mongering. It was an indication of the shallow comprehension the Conservative Party has of immigration issues.
Move forward to the present day. When Harper took power he began deporting illegal workers, as promised. That these workers have become an integral part of our economy does not matter. That employers need these workers, many of them skilled tradespeople, is never factored into the equation. That many of these workers have been in the country for long enough to have school-aged children and have been contributing to our society for a decade or more is not considered. The only consideration is that they came illegally.
Harper could have turned the presence of these illegal workers into a political coup that eroded the Liberal hold over the immigrant vote. It was Liberal policy that so drastically favoured rich over poor when it came to immigration, after all. Saying that policy was so flawed that a general amnesty for illegal workers was needed as long as they came forward and registered would have done a lot to increase the Conservative vote in the immigrant community. Workers would have become legal, would gain a political voice, and would begin to enjoy the rights and protections that other Canadian workers have. They could be given access to trades training or given the opportunity to become certified in their trades.
Instead Harper has chosen to criminalize many immigrants and, in doing so, has threatened the ability of many small businesses to complete contracts they have already accepted.
Stephen Harper could also use Fox’s request to accept more Mexican agricultural guest workers to the advantage of both Canada and Mexico. The first step in that equation is to guarantee that they will be offered the same rights and protections as other Canadian workers. The second is to welcome them not just as labourers willing to do work that Canadians are not willing to do, but to offer them training programs during their off season. Such a program would allow these workers to gain access into Canadian society and to take their new skills home with them, improving the lives of people in Mexico as well.
At the same time, requiring employers to treat guest workers just as well as Canadian workers would make it possible for Canadians who wish to become agricultural workers to do so. The common wisdom suggests that Canadians simply do not want to perform the hard work involved in farm labour, so guest workers are needed to fill the void. More likely is that the poor working conditions and low pay have discouraged Canadians from seeking work in the field and the employers, instead of improving conditions and pay, have chosen to use guest workers.
To carry this one step further, Harper could agree to accept guest workers on the condition that Mexico moves to increase worker’s rights and pay rates at home. This would serve to reduce the wage gap, making Canada more competitive with Mexico, while allowing Mexican workers the opportunity to work fewer hours in better conditions and for higher rates of pay at home. Harper could even make the point that many Mexican farm workers are looking for work in Canada and the US because of the devastating effects the combination of NAFTA and US agricultural subsidies are having.
The final area that Stephen Harper and the Conservatives have failed to address is that of professionals who have arrived in Canada only to find that their credentials are not recognised in Canada. Credentials are important and vary widely around the world, so we must be careful that we don’t end up with doctors that don’t meet our standards or engineers that don’t understand our building codes.
A lack of credentials should not disqualify immigrants though. Even if they are not trained up to our standards, they have presumably shown some propensity for the skills required in their chosen fields. We should, now that we’ve enticed these people to leave their home countries, offer them the opportunity to upgrade their skills. Such an offer could be tied to a requirement for those who accepted the offer to move to areas where their services are in demand, addressing the problems of obtaining services in rural and northern areas. It could also be tied to providing part-time aid in the developing countries, mitigating the effects of our poaching of some of their best and brightest citizens.
It is, predictably and unfortunately, unlikely that Mr. Harper and his party will do anything substantial or effective to address Canada’s immigration issues. What is far more likely is that the answer will be more integration with US immigration policies despite their failed policies leading to issues surrounding illegal workers reaching near crisis proportions. We may accept more Mexican workers, but we will not extend more rights and protections to them. We will continue to deport those deemed illegal by our flawed system, even as we scramble to replace them through that same flawed system. We will continue to poach professionals from their home countries even as we continue to deem their credentials inadequate and refuse to offer them help in earning acceptable credentials.
Stephen Harper, just like Paul Martin, sees immigration issues through the eyes of corporate America. He has gone one step further and is moving to adopt the recent American model of marginalizing all immigrants by criminalizing some. It is time Canada began to see immigration through the eyes of a nation built by immigrant workers. Unfortunately Stephen Harper is not a man capable of that sort of vision.
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 5, 2006]
I had it made in my homeland and had no economic reasons to leave. It took many years of extreme hardships as a political refugee, but I didn't want to die for nothing. My wife was born as a hated Hungarian ethnic minority in Romania so her family had no wish to go back to that hell either.
Although we lived and worked in England for 7 years and the British government granted us citizenship, we could have stayed forever, England wasn't a place to stay.
The Canadian government had immigration offices all over Europe at the time, literally begging for people to come here with poster campaigns , large ads in the papers and articles praising life in Canada.
We came on a small ship of the so called Greek Line, that started off in Hamburg with about 700 German immigrants, then to Southampton for a dozen, or so from England, including ourselves, then to Cherbourg, where a lighter brought out a handful from France, then to Cobh in Ireland for another handful by another lighter.
In my opinion, people should be encouraged to stay at home and their governments should do everything within their power to make their peoples happy to stay, as most will never leave their homes psychologically. Emigration for most is a bitter pill to swallow.
Not for us, as we found happiness in Canada and would never have changed. We made a clear break for practical reasons, have completely integrated and never went back anywhere, even for short visits.
But here we see people who "have to go home", just about every year. In other words, they should have stayed, as they never cut their umbilical cords, registering the "home country citizenships" of their Canadian born children, demanding them to follow "home" customs, voting in their "home" elections, following the demands of their ethnic leaders. The casualty list of the Air India disaster was a good example of this "going home" hysteria.
I fully agree with the Reverend that people who come here and establish roots, make decent living and contribute to the well being of Canada should be able to stay. Even if they dream of "home". We see it on the TV every week, when decent, working people are torn up and families torn apart, sometimes against clear evidence that the deportation will not only do economic damage in this country, but can endanger the life of the victim and ruin the lives of their families here.
There seem to be some sadistic characters in the Vancouver office of Immigration, who appear to take perverse joy in sending innocent people and political refugees back to places like Iran and other violent societies.
At the same time, there are dozens, or even hundreds of illegals on Hastings St. selling drugs, and more sentenced and proven criminals, who "can not be deported", and some who have already been deported several times, yet are back. BCTV is running regular newsclips on such cases on both sides.
The only conclusion, we, the unwashed public, can draw from this illogical situation, bordering on the criminal is, that politicians and governments are in sore need of some brains testing machines.
Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.
I personally think the Liberal amnesty was a good idea if implemented properly. I think the Conservatives missed the boat on that one. The Cons did advocate getting the professional acreditations of foreign countries recognized and they should move forward with this so that we don't have a bunch of doctors driving cabs even though this is not one of their 5 main priorities. The Cons also advocated getting the refugee backlog cleared... it is very unfortunate that the Portugese are getting caught in that effort. The other issue is those immigration consultants... they should be shut down. Anyone who advised someone from Portugal to apply for refugee status is an idiot and should be stripped of their business license.
The 2+ year backlog for refugee claims is abhorrent. This should be 4-6 months tops. People should know where they stand before they put down roots. The Cons implementation of their strategy to get the 2+ year backlog cleared is faulty, notwithstanding its intent.
The Reverend's appeal for more Mexicans is laudable, and for the most part I support it. Supporting them with additional job training, however is not something I support. If we have the resources for job training, let's start with new immigrants or people already here on a full time basis, not part time agricultural workers. If we intend to improve the training of people in Mexico, set up schools in Mexico so that people can learn and apply those skills at home.
I agree as well. If the Mexican government isn't going to help the huge sector of it's population out of poverty, why should we?
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
shhesh
selective charity, eh mr KWIS
---
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.
Ezra Pound
The only good is knowledge, and the only e
Whether we help them here or at home is largely immaterial, but if they're here anyway why not offer the education in Canada?
Thank You R B<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0107779.html">http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0107779.html</a><br />
<br />
Literacy rate: 92% (2003 est.)<br />
<p>---<br>Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding. <br />
Ezra Pound<br />
The only good is knowledge...
I agree entirely with everything you've said, Blair. Also nice to read Ed Deak's comments ... he has always struck me as a man who 'gets it'.
Paul Harris
I don't disagree that training will help Mexico. I think Canada should assist Mexico in 2 key areas:
1. Education - smarter allies are better allies. Set up schools and training facilites to provide Mexicans with the education needed to compete. Train them to build manufacturing plants (as opposed to just building them ourselves and then staffing with Mexicans), train them as doctors, engineers, skilled trade workers, etc... This, along with the next point will help raise their standard of living.
2. Infrastructure - We got Mexico into free trade to take advantage of their lower labour costs, but we don't get to reap those rewards because 80% of Mexicans live in unserviceable areas. Build some roads, communications lines and railways to open up these areas so they can take advantage of our dollar through business and we can get access to their labour and products.
Emigree societies can easily become snake pits, especially among uneducated people, who fall prey to self appointed ethnic leaders and gangs. We have ample examples of this now, all over BC.
Which reminds me, as long as we're talking about the deportation of valuable people, why in the hell are our Asian and Hispanic gang members not deported ? Who is protecting them and why?
Ed Deak.
Some of my best friends have been nazis, communists and now capitalists, as long as they didn't try to talk their silly ideologies.
In my experience, most people could agree on most things if they could shed all ideological and faith based claptrap. As I have done many years ago,when I found out that they all were ruling class creating frauds.
Somehow, I don't like ruling classes, powerful people and their systems, VIPs and basically anything "big".
Cheers, Ed.
Yeah, right. Read as beneficial to big business interests and not the people.
"The first step in that equation is to guarantee that they will be offered the same rights and protections as other Canadian workers."
Why not just makes them all citizens and be done with it, a free flowing stream of endless labour to make even minimum wage jobs too costly. Bet on companies wanting a reduction of minimum wage in order to take maximum advantage of this if it ever happens.
"The second is to welcome them not just as labourers willing to do work that Canadians are not willing to do, but to offer them training programs during their off season."
Here's an idea, put CANADIAN workers first. We have to look after our own, first and foremost.
"Such a program would allow these workers to gain access into Canadian society and to take their new skills home with them, improving the lives of people in Mexico as well."
Yeah, right. Like they'll want to go back home after being here?
Who came up with this anyway?
If there was ever a recipe that was tailor made for producing domestic unrest, this is it.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
<br />
I agree with the words of you signature,<br />
It pretty much nails it as far as I can see and also cuts across the full spectrum of all but those who hold knowledge alluded to.<br />
<br />
As a knowledge life-long knowledge seeker my observations up until this moment in time demonstrate clearly the “we” needs to be one the same page the Knowledge-Holders possess. (sic?)<br />
<br />
Otherwise there is advantage and disadvantage.<br />
<br />
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, (former Senior Policy Advisor in the US Department of Education)<br />
<br />
John Taylor Gatto <a href="http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/aboutus/john.htm">http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/aboutus/john.htm</a> <br />
<br />
Garry Allen <a href="http://www.netctr.com/books.html">http://www.netctr.com/books.html</a> <br />
Plus many others have brought to the fore, that which others dismiss a “Conspiracy Theories” and thereby collude with the conspiracy.<br />
<br />
<br />
That is one thing!<br />
What fries my ass though is that damned near all in opposition to what the Knowledge-Holders either hold or have access to is playing off what we are “told” is happening<br />
<br />
The “guest workers” are our brothers and sisters for Christ sake!<br />
<br />
When reaction to a paradigm takes place is it not proper to focus on those (who “legally” elected by us) are the ones at cause, not the “guest worker”?<br />
<br />
What is wrong with this picture?<br />
You Are! <br />
I am!<br />
We are!<br />
<br />
‘Ceptin the Knowledge-Holders freakin played the non Knowledge holders<br />
<br />
Grifters get it!<br />
The point being is <br />
There are criminals IN law as well as Outlaws<br />
<br />
Politicians of all stripe are noted for this trait and actively encouraged to<br />
<br />
Cross the floor (quaint expression, that)<br />
Use carefully crafted baffle-gab <br />
Ostafacation<br />
And all manner of cunning linguist trickery<br />
<p>---<br>Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding. <br />
Ezra Pound<br />
The only good is knowledge...