Regina Police Charge Man With Promoting Hatred Online

Posted on Sunday, January 27 at 12:45 by rearguard
Some of the postings referred to Jews as "parasites" and "vermin," and called for the expulsion of Jews and non-white people from Canada, the tribunal ruled. Tremaine calls himself a "white nationalist." In June, he told CBC he should be free to share his views without being prosecuted. Full story here http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2008/01/24/tremaine-charged.html

Note: http://www.cbc.ca/canad...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:20 pm
    From my mailbox.
    Can anyone see the hypocracy here?

    You may have noticed the postings on my website this week about a man called Richard Warman. His attacks on free speech - including my own - in league with government agencies and Jewish organisations like B'nai B'rith, the Anti-Defamation League (whose job is to defame people) and the Canadian Jewish Congress need urgently to be exposed to the wider world.

    This is not just a story about Canada - it is the blueprint for the end of free expression that is unfolding across the planet under the guise of Orwellian terms like 'Political Correctness' and 'Hate Speech'.

    I first came across Richard Warman, a 'lawyer' working for the Canadian government, when he campaigned with the above organisations to have my public talks in Canada and elsewhere banned because I was a 'racist'. This is invariably the insult hurled at anyone who gets close to the truth. Even people demanding the truth about 9/11 or those questioning the official version of global warming have been dubbed as akin to 'Holocaust Deniers' and if you question any aspect of the official version of the Nazi concentration camps you can now be jailed by the Thought Police.
    snip to>
    In a speech in Toronto on July 6th 2005, Warman described his modus operandi as a technique of 'Maximum Disruption':

    'I've come to the conclusion that I can be most effective by using what I like to describe as a 'maximum disruption' approach. ... If I think that they've violated the Canadian Human Rights Act, then I'll look at all of the potential targets and file complaints against them starting on a 'worst offender' basis, although sometimes if I just find people to be particularly annoying this may move them up the list a bit.'

    Warman continues:

    'The "maximum disruption" part comes in because wherever I think it will be most helpful, or even if I just feel it will be the most fun, I strongly believe in hitting the neo-nazis on as many of these fronts as possible either at the same time or one after the other. I say this because it keeps them off-balance and forces them to respond to things that focus their energies on defending themselves ...'

    (My emphasis. D.I.).

    Warman, still an employee of the Canadian government the last I heard, is always strongly supported by B'nai B'rith (Rothschilds), the Anti-Defamation League (Rothschilds) and the Canadian Jewish Congress or 'CJC' (Bronfman family, connected to the Rothschilds).

    Snip to >
    One rant posted on a forum called Freedomsite on September 5th 2003 can be seen below. Apologies for the language, but we are adults and this is what was posted about a black Canadian Senator called Anne Cools.

    'Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
    And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.

    She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before
    there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced
    their bullshit down our throats.

    Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place...
    And that place was NOT in public!'

    This was posted by a user name called '90sAREover' and it was following this that a Warman 'investigation' began into racist postings on the Freedomsite. So who was the poster of this vicious, stomach-turning racism on a site then targeted by Richard Warman for prosecution by the Canadian 'Human Rights' Commission?

    Well, well, well.

    The owner of the Freedomsite and the target of Warman's subsequent 'investigation' is a man called Marc Lemire, a computer 'nerd' and technical expert who traced the posting to the same computer (IP address = 66.185.84.204) from which was posted another user name called 'Lucy'.

    Who was 'Lucy', by his own admission under oath? Richard Warman.

    Another computer expert, Bernard Klatt, did his own investigation into the origin of this sick and despicable attack on Anne Cools and this was his verdict in an affidavit submitted as evidence to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on February 8th 2007:

    'Based on the information provided in this affidavit, in my expert opinion, I concluded that the Freedomsite message board user accounts "90sAREover" and "lucy" are those of Richard Warman and that Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed "Cools don't belong in our Senate" posted September 5, 2003.'

    Don't bother pinching yourself, I've tried. It was also admitted by the 'Human Rights' Commission that its 'senior human rights investigator', Dean Steacy, posts on the 'White Pride' Stormfront website using the name 'Jadewarr'. The game is simple: get an anonymous account to post racist comments on a website and then charge the website owners with posting racist comments.


    ---
    "When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."

    William Blake

  2. Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:13 pm
    I believe Warman is a licensed lawyer.

    Filing a complaint with his provincial licensing college may very well get his license revoked because of behaviour and actions detrimental to the law profession.

    Here we have a shining example of a member of the Canadian Jewish Congrees, the CJC, spending the tax payer's dime to slag another minority, the German Community, while working for the Canadian Government!!!!

    I have suspected for a long time that governments have their own agendas that rarely coincide with the citizen's.

    The German-Canadian societies should file a complaint against him for slagging commentary!

    The only good from all this is that the Islamic Community representatives and the Jewish Community reps are now at each other's throats. They truly deserve each other and I hope that they waste enormous amounts of each other's time and money. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people.

    H.F. Wolff

  3. by Belle
    Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:47 pm
    My comments are not about racism but rather reality and I never in a million years expected I would be speaking on this side of this issue but because of the situation my sons and I are currently dealing with I have something I would like to add to this discussion...

    Based on my shocking and horrific experience with the government and justice system in Canada over the past couple of years I have come to believe something that I had never once thought about in any way prior to this experience...Jewish people wrongfully and against the rules and laws in this country have significantly more power in Canada than non-Jewish people and I say this not in any way attacking Jewish people but rather justly attacking any group of people wrongfully having more rights and power than any other group of people in a country that clearly and strongly prohibits such injustice and discrimination.

    It can't help but be extremely obvious that many of the people and in fact most of the people that are getting away with very serious and criminal misconduct in our situation and that are being outrageously and shockingly wrongfully and unjustly protected by the government and justice system in our situation are Jewish, including one of the Defendants in our major medical malpractice case and the lawyers for the Defendants in our major medical malpractice case and other major players on the side of the defence in our major medical malpractice case.

    We have absolutely clear evidence for example of Alan Rudakoff, the lawyer for the Defendants in our major medical malpractice case outright lying repeatedly to the Court and judges in our case wrongfully personally attacking me with absolutely no evidence supporting these attacks and clear evidence proving them to be false and fraudulent, which is clearly documented in court transcripts and proven by the evidence, yet the Court and judges of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta in Calgary have outrageously and unjustly ignored this extremely obvious seriously unlawful misconduct and shockingly gone along with it, which is proven to be very seriously wrong and unjust by absolutely evidence...why?

    And we have further absolute evidence of similar very serious and illegal misconduct by other members of Alan Rudakoff's legal team that also just happen to be Jewish...is the legal system and government system in Canada accepting this very serious misconduct and protecting them because they are Jewish? Based on the very shocking and significant evidence we can't help but be asking this question at this point regardless of how this goes directly against the beliefs we have held for our lifetime up until this point.

    And the psychiatrist, Dr. Kenneth Hashman, that we believe is Jewish that has fraudulently provided a completely worthless hypothetical report for the lawyers for the Defendants that are Jewish to give to the court ridiculously reporting that though he has never met me the severe dental injuries I am suffering with that have been clearly and objectively diagnosed by several dental professionals to have been caused to me, AND MY 2 CHILDREN as well, by seriously negligent orthodontic treatment done to us by the defendants, one of which is Jewish, may have been caused by mental illness, which I do not suffer from and have no history of and that is absolutely no valid evidence to support...because I reported to have had trouble sleeping due to the severe pain I suffered as a direct result of the severe dental injuries caused to me by the Defendants, despite them presenting absolutely no evidence supporting this absolutely absurd and ridiculous theory, which insanely was seriously wrongfully accepted as a possibility by Justice Paul Chrumka and has been used to seriously threaten and harass me and my children, including outrageously being used to attempt to have me committed into Dr. Kenneth Hashman's maximum security forensic psychiatric facility because I have clear and absolute evidence proving very serious and unlawful misconduct on the part of Alan Rudakoff and his legal defence team, including Eugene Bodnar, and clear absolute evidence proving the Defendant, Dr. Barry Hoffman, very clearly committed perjury and fraud including filing fraudulent diagnostic materials, including an analysis of an x-ray when the evidence including his own testimony prove no x-ray to base this anaysis on was ever taken or in his possession, which is part of his affidavit of records to knowingly attempt to obstruct justice and deny my children and I justice, which again is proven beyond any doubt by his own words in his testimony under oath, and further unlawful misconduct on the part of Dr. Hashman himself. Are these people unlawfully protecting one another because they are all Jewish and is the government and legal system in Canada wrongfully unjustly and unlawfully assisting them and protecting them because they are all Jewish and Jewish people have more power and have more influence and rights in Canada?

    What would people say if the situation was reversed and it was my sons and I that were Jewish while everyone else was not and we were being so seriously wrongfully and unlawfully unjustly mistreated? Would we have a case for discrimination? Why is it only discrimination if it is against Jewish people but not discrimination and unlawful if it is Jewish people conspiring against non-Jewish people? I am very interested in hearing from others about their opinions of this issue.

    Prior to this experience I in my 43 years had absolutely no negative feelings or thoughts about Jewish people but considering how extremely unjustly and horribly my sons and I have been harassed and mistreated by the many Jewish people involved in our situation I can't help but feel that those involved, and only those involved, in this very seriously heinous and unlawful misconduct against my children and I have conspired together and protected each other at least in part because they are all Jewish and place their being Jewish above all else including what is right and honest and moral and just and lawful and any one who would judge me is not being fair as again if the situation was reversed it would be them crying discrimination at the top of their lungs for all to hear without any backlash. It must work both ways or no way at all. Discrimination is discrimination and is wrong in all circumstances, period.

  4. Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:39 pm
    Belle,

    Let me ask you this, do you know:

    How many Canadian soldiers died in Europe during WW II?

    How many British soldiers died during WW II?

    How many British civilians died during WW II?

    How many French soldiers died during WW II?

    How many French civilians died during WW II?

    However, I BET DOLLARS TO DONUTS THAT YOU KNOW HOW MANY JEWS (SUPPOSEDLY) DIED DURING WW II, RIGHT?

    Now ask yourself WHY you know this!

    You should know that an excellent case can be made that NONE were murdered during WW II; the International RED CROSS records state a number of around 273000 or so died of all causes. Applying actuarial calculations to the number of survivors claimed by various Jewish organizations, ie. the number that receives "compensation" from Germany, would show that NONE were killed during WW II. Life insurance people are very good at this sort of calculation.... Have you ever heard of one going broke? :-))

    I believe that your thinking about and digesting the forgoing will permit you to answer your internal question as to who protects whom, and who is in control of things.

    I -we- get called all sorts of things when we point out what is patently obvious to many.... but I have grown a thick skin over the years.

    Let me know if you wish to know more about this..... You might start by reading Diogenes posts regarding free speech, and follow the references he cites.

    For your particular case see if you can find a prominent law firm that will take your case on a "pro bono" , ie. free basis. Good law firms will do a certain amount of their work on this basis. Good luck.

    All the best,

    H.F. Wolff



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news