EI Overhaul Underhanded

Posted on Saturday, March 08 at 11:51 by Rural
CAN CANADIAN workers and employers expect to pay lower employment insurance premiums now that federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is turning EI into a self-financing Crown corporation?
Not likely, in our opinion. For it’s hard to imagine premium-payers getting a break if Mr. Flaherty gets away with the huge financial deception that lies at the heart of the underfunded EI restructuring announced in last week’s budget.
In a nutshell, the shell game is this: When EI shifts from government program to Crown corporation, its $54-billion accounting surplus is going to get lost in the shuffle. The Harper government is cynically wiping this debt to EI stakeholders off the books – though you won’t see any admission of this anywhere in the budget papers. Instead, Mr. Flaherty merely tells us that the government will provide the new EI with a $2-billion cash reserve and run the plan on a "go-forward basis."
Now that’s a sweet deal for the finance minister. He’s redeeming the federal government’s $54-billion IOU to EI at four cents cash on the dollar.
It’s not a sweet deal for those who will pay future premiums. For $2 billion is not nearly an adequate financial reserve for EI.
In recent years, EI’s actuary has estimated that $15 billion is a prudent reserve for EI – if we want to ensure the fund can get through a recession, when payouts shoot up, without a dramatic spike in premiums as well.
So where does Mr. Flaherty suddenly get the idea that $2 billion is the appropriate financial back-up for the new fund? The budget, typically, doesn’t say. But it’s probably no coincidence that EI is currently taking in $3 billion more in cash every year than it needs to cover annual benefits. So Ottawa can easily fund a $2-billion reserve for the new EI out of the old EI’s current cash flow. Basically, Mr. Flaherty would be putting nothing into the new corporation beyond the cash raised from EI premiums this year, and maybe not even all of that. This is irresponsible and a disgrace.

.
.
.

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (1 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:05 am
    I can hear it now.
    EI is running out of money, the government will have to cut back payments.

    Ultimately, this helps to keep wages low, just the way the bosses like it!

  2. Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:15 pm
    I always knew it was a tax. You can't ever get out of it what you put in, now you never will be able to.

    They should just remove the word 'insurance' from 'Employment Insurance', and drop the pretence.

  3. Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:36 pm
    Yep! The EI surplus has been raided ritually by ever stripe of government for years and then they have the gall to raise "premiums". It is a payroll tax that is in reality a "hidden income tax" on the worker.

  4. by Rural
    Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:03 pm
    I became self employed in part because of this rip off, then you get out exactly what you put in.....nothing. Its the Governments two faced spin on this that gets me realy pissed off!

  5. Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:39 pm
    Well, to be fair, Rural, they do suggest that you can continue to contribute premiums if you want, even though you won't qualify for benefits. I had a good laugh the day I read that, but there it was, right in the government pamphlet.

  6. Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:30 pm
    Can anybody read the websites? All I get is "Page can not be found" on all stories.

    Ed Deak.

  7. Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:04 am
    "Ed Deak" said
    Can anybody read the websites? All I get is "Page can not be found" on all stories.

    Ed Deak.


    I fixed this one Ed. Sorry for that. Sometimes one slips by me.

  8. Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:06 pm
    Sorry Dr.C. but virtually none of the quited sites work. Just tried them.

    Cheers, Ed.

  9. Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:08 pm
    Let's not forget the $50 billion Paul Martin stole, so that makes $104 billion they owe the workers of Canada

  10. Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:31 pm
    Sorry Dr.C. but virtually none of the quited sites work. Just tried them.

    Cheers, Ed.


    That is odd.

    Here are direct links to the story. They seem to work.

    http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/2359 ... nderhanded

    http://thechronicleherald.ca/Editorials/1042305.html



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news