Nationalism Back At The Forefront In Canada

Posted on Wednesday, April 16 at 17:26 by sthompson
Nationalism back at the forefront April 12, 2008
THOMAS WALKOM

Back in the late '80s, it was fashionable to talk of the demise of the nation-state. Globalization, it was said, had made both nationalism and national governments redundant. We were told that the world had been transformed into a collection of regions, all bound together through supranational arrangements such as the European Union.

In Canada, the economic nationalism that had fuelled an earlier decade was declared passé. Advocates such as former Edmonton publisher Mel Hurtig were stricken from media Rolodexes.

Now, some 20 years later, it appears that the obituary was premature. The surprise federal government decision to stall the sale of domestic space firm MacDonald Dettwiler to a U.S. company only underlines this fact.

Indeed, there never was much substance to the end-of-nation thesis. The bloody civil wars that rent Yugoslavia in the '90s demonstrated the continuing power of ethnic nationalism. The 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington acted as a harsh reminder to North Americans that national borders still matter.

Canada's elites, however, are always slow to catch on. Within this country's business establishment, the overwhelming response to 9/11 has been a call for even less nationalism.

The theory is that Canada can survive economically only if it plants itself firmly inside Fortress North America. If that demands common borders, common markets or helping the U.S. fight its global wars, then so be it.

Hence the decision to send troops to Kandahar; hence the various government/business schemes (the so-called security and prosperity partnership being the latest) to align Canadian laws and regulations with those of the U.S.

The fundamental flaw in this great scheme, however, is that it assumes the U.S. is onside with this post-nationalist project. It is not. Never shy about their patriotism, Americans have become more jingoistic. In part, this is a response to 9/11; the U.S. is simply not interested in dismantling its border posts. But in part, it is a response to the fear of hard times...

Full article: Nationalism Back at the Forefront

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:56 am
    Peter C. Newman posits that this "reactivated" nationalism will see the demise of nations in a direction opposite globalization, and more in the direction of the city-state..........

  2. Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:51 am
    Well, of course the obituary is premature. 99.9% of my fellow Canadians i talk to still believe that the maintenance of, and improvement upon, this country called Canada is still important. What good is it when trade agreements and institutions like NAFTA and the WTO through their corporate friendly rules prevent governments from improving their country`s situation by preventing them from enacting progressive legislation? Countries and cultures are still all too important to people. And Canada to me, is still a wonderful idea! I still think that we Canadians, and people of other countries, can still take back their sovereignty, and self-actualize, improve, and evolve as the greater communities that we are. We can still be friends and trade with other countries, but the people, through their governments, should formulate the rules. But as we know, it is the banker-corporate fascists, who dictate through our puppet governmnets.

  3. Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:45 am
    ^I thats an over simplification. Canada doesn't run it's own production for one thing, whoever knows anything knows that. Especially in Edmonton. Canadian companies are selling like hotcakes to the foreigners..eg shell canada to the dutch and many more. This government doesn't care and never will. Unless you have a plan for taking back sovereignty don't bother mentioning it. Kind of a waste of time. Canada is not a Nation State we are owned by the British; the queen is the largest holder of land in the world. We could never be Nationalist because the elites would NEVER allow for it, they destroy every nationalist government. The fact is that any independents get run out of town by the big box. Ive lived through the classic example of this and believe me we're just a bunch of merchants in Canada

  4. Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:30 am
    Yes, Canadian corporations are being sold out because we don't have strong foreign ownership laws. However, it's hardly the British that own us or are threatening our ability to maintain a strong nation--as George Grant pointed out in Lament for a Nation over 40 years ago, our problem with sovereignty has been the fact that the US likes to use us a source of resources. The "free trade" agreements only institutionalized that, and recent NAFTA-plus agreements such as the Security and Prosperity Partnership are taking us even further down the road of deep integration. Our elites profit from this, and toady to their US masters, becoming (as Ron Dart calls them) compradors to the U.S. empire. It's heartening that Canadians are finally waking up to this fact, and speaking up to say NO. But it needs to become a serious election issue next federal election, and we need to keep hammering on this until the mainstream realizes it's happening too or we won't win back our independence.

  5. by Arrow
    Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:39 pm
    Channel Billy Green and James Fitzgibbon. Maybe a bit of Joseph Willcocks. Depends on the person. Remember that this country has a great deal of potential greatness: we just have to believe in ourselves.

  6. Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:14 am
    Prior to the arrival of the OIL SHIEKs, the Brits were whinning about canadians owning everything in sight........because the Brits had to sell everything to pay their stupid taxes....



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news