Over the next few months, our Conservative federal government is conducting a review that will determine the future of universal, public postal service. This review is pretty much a secret review and it could be very bad news for rural communities.
The government's review will look at three very basic and important questions: What postal services should people receive? Who should provide them? And should Canada Post continue to have an exclusive privilege to handle addressed letters or should the letter market be open for competition?
Anyone who thinks that a little competition never hurt anyone might want to take a closer look at how our postal system actually works. Canada Post has an exclusive privilege to handle letters so that it is able to generate enough money to provide affordable postal service to everyone, no matter where they live.
While the exclusive privilege isn't often discussed, most people seem to like what it does. In fact, ninety-one percent of respondents to an Angus Reid poll said universal postal service at a uniform rate is one of the really great things about Canada Post.
Unfortunately, our popular and egalitarian one-pricegoes anywhere service could disappear. If the government decides to eliminate our post office's exclusive privileges as a result of its review, Canada Post would almost certainly face a downward spiral. Private sector competitors would focus on profitable areas and services, leaving unprofitable parts to our public post office. With fewer profits, Canada Post would find it increasingly difficult - and eventually impossible - to provide uniform and affordable service, especially in rural and remote parts of the country.
Even though the Conservative government's review could change the very nature of our postal system, the Tories are not planning on holding public hearings or doing much to publicize their examination of Canada Post.
They have issued a media release asking for submissions by
The fact that the government is not holding public hearings and is proceedings at breakneck pace with its review suggests that it is not really interested in hearing from the real owners and stakeholders of our post office - the public.
It is also disturbing that the chair of the review has written a book titled The Politics of Postal Transformation which recommends that the federal government eliminate the exclusive privilege. Aside from the obvious, it is disturbing because the few countries that have fully removed their post office's privilege or monopoly on letters have suffered. They now have fewer jobs, less service and higher postal rates for people and small business.
As is, our basic postage rate currently ranks as one of the lowest in the industrial world.
Letter mail is secure, cheap, on time 96.1 per cent of the time and delivered to everyone at a single price.
In a recent national poll, Canada Post surpassed the CBC and the Supreme Court as the most trusted federal institution in
If you like your secure, trusted, affordable and universal postal service and think that federal government is trying to fix something that isn't broken, contact the Canada Post Strategic review at
You might want to express concerns about post office closures. Last time the Conservatives were in office, they closed about 1,500 rural post offices before being stopped by public outrage and an election defeat. Don't forget that a speedy review without public hearings is hardly a democratic way to decide the fate of our publicly-owned post office.
Denis Lemelin,
President of the
Canadian
Workers
http://www.citizen.on.ca/news/2008/0710/mailbox/026.html

The guy was interviewed on TV and reminded that the whole thing was about cities and nothing about rural communities. He laughed and said :"Well, they'll just have to move to the cities,ha, ha, ha, ha ......!" Which opened up long ongoing the master plan by so called "economists, for the depopulation of the countryside, now going on all over the world and jamming everybody into mega cities, where they're forced to buy everything.
The Mulroney gang closed some 1,500 post offices, firing thousands, setting up green boxes, to "save" and alleged $100. million.
I calculated at the time that if only 1 million people were forced to drive an extra 2.5 km each way, at 50 kmh, 3 times a week, to collect and send their mail, or half the distance 6 times a week, at .30 cents/km it transferred approx. $234 million per year waste on the public in car expenses, and the 25 million hours at an average of $8/hr. another $200. million. not counting accidents, etc. For these "savings" the then head of the PO, by the name of Lander, received a $90,000/yr pay raise and the Order of Canada for showing a $26. million "profit" in 1992.
Costs can not be cut, only transferred on other sectors, the environment and the future.
Back in the 50s local mail was .04 cents, outside .05 cents and we were getting 2 deliveries a day in Vancouver. We had milk, etc. deliveries and doctors were making house calls.
Now, with our marvellous, "wealth creating, globally competitive market economy", the biggest goddamn fraud, and racket, in human history, we can't afford anything, have to travel long distances, miles long waiting lists for medical services, corporatized old peoples homes, 1000 + % inflation. The so called "free trade agreements" killing the democratic decision making powers of communities, etc. etc. and these criminally insane Socred/Reform idiots are planning more enslavement to the corporate carpet bagger mafia.
Ed Deak. Big Lake, BC.
http://www.canadapost.ca/corporate/abou ... p?prid=666
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsMar0802.html
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national ... 40629.html
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/polit ... 7d&k=47559
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/polit ... 25&k=99006
Who are CGI is a questions Canadians need to start asking and now...
http://www.cgi.com/web/en/industries/go ... port-e.htm
http://www.cgi.com/web/en/media_room/me ... ts/156.htm
When did Canadians vote to allow CGI to transform our government? Or should I say take it over to serve their own private interests? Why would Canadians want a private corporation with private interests and significant ties to the U.S. government/Bush administration taking over and controlling our government and how could this possibly be in the best interest of Canadians and our country...it's clearly not.
http://www.innovapost.com/index.php/abo ... areholders