Naomi Joins 'Culture' Campaign To Beat Tories ; Naomi's Speaking Tour

To: jmeaton@ns.sympatico.ca

Subject: New Orleans: The City That Won't Be Ignored

Date sent: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:55:54 -0400

From: Naomi Klein's Newsletter listmaster@naomiklein.org

------- End of forwarded message -------

Don't Miss Naomi's U.S. and Canadian Tour This September!

Starting this week, Naomi is back on the road discussing the latest in the politics of shock. The tour starts in New York City, where  Naomi will join Jeremy Scahill, Laura Flanders, Roberto Lovato and Malia Luza at a fundraiser for The Indypendent. On September 14, Naomi will participate in a panel discussion on the state of the U.S. economy with Joseph Stiglitz and Jared Bernstein at 92nd Street Y, also in New York City.  She will also visit Forest Grove, Oregon on September 17 and Claremont, Calif In Canada, you can see Naomi in Lethbridge on September 22, Regina on September 23, Wolfville on September 25, Halifax on September 26, and  Toronto on September 29. She will continue speaking throughout the United States in October - more tour dates to come!

Naomi Joins Campaign to Beat the Tories

The United States isn't the only country in the grips of a heated election campaign. Last weekend Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper dissolved Parliament and called for a snap federal election to be held on October 14. Many groups in Canada are frantically organizing to prevent another victory for the Conservatives, aware that the stakes in this election are extremely high. Although the Tories will run on a moderate platform,  there is every indication that, if elected, they will use the economic crisis to push through radical cuts to Canadian social and cultural programs -- a classic Shock Doctrine tactic.

The process has in fact already begun, with $60 million slashed from cultural programs since 2006. Naomi is lending her support to a new initiative called the Department of Culture: a loose coalition of Canadian artists who are using their creative skills to unseat vulnerable Tories in the upcoming elections. http://departmentofculture.ca/about/

If you are Canadian, check out Naomi's speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjUu57Ln7L0&eurl=http://departmentofculture.ca/page/2/

at the launch event for the Department of Culture and find out how to get involved.

---------------------------------

Latest Column

New Orleans: The City That Won't Be Ignored

by Naomi Klein

September 3, 2008

 The early results are in: Hurricane Gustav has helped John McCain's bid for the White House. This is nothing short of incredible.

 In the combination of New Orleans and hurricanes, we have the most powerful argument possible for the necessity of "change." It´s all there: gaping inequality, deep racism, crumbling public infrastructure, global warming, rampant corruption, the Blackwater-ization of the public sector. And none of it is in the past tense. In New Orleans whole neighborhoods have gone to seed, Charity Hospital remains shuttered, public housing has been deliberately destroyed-and the levee system is still far from repaired.

 Gustav should have been political rat poison for the Republicans, no matter how well it was managed. Yet, as Peter Baker noted in the New York Times, "rather than run away from the hurricane and its political risks, Mr. McCain ran toward it." If this strategy worked, it was at least partly because Barack Obama has been running away from New Orleans for his entire campaign. 

Unlike John Edwards, who started and ended his nomination bid surrounded by the decay of New Orleans´s Ninth Ward, Obama has shied away from the powerful symbolism the city offers. He waited almost a year after Hurricane Katrina to visit New Orleans and spent just half a day there ahead of the Louisiana primary. During the DemocraticNational Convention, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden made no mention of New Orleans in their keynotes. Bill Clinton spared just two words: "Katrina and cronyism."

 In his Denver speech, Obama did invoke a government "that sits on its hands while a major American city drowns before our eyes." But that only scratches the surface of what happened to New Orleans´s poorestresidents, who were first forcibly relocated and then forced to watch from afar as their homes, schools and hospitals were stolen. As Obama spoke in Denver, families in New Orleans were already packing their bags in anticipation of Gustav, steeling themselves for yet another evacuation. They heard not even a perfunctory "our thoughts and prayers are with you" from the Democratic candidate for President.

 There are plenty of political reasons for this, of course. Obama´s campaign is pitching itself to the middle class, not the class ofdiscarded people New Orleans represents. The problem is that by remaining virtually silent about the most dramatic domestic outrage in modern US history, Obama created a political vacuum. When Gustav hit, all McCain needed to do to fill it was show up. Sure, it was cynical for McCain to claim the hurricane zone as a campaign backdrop. But it was Obama who left that potent terrain as vacant as a lot in the Lower Ninth Ward.

 Until now, Obama´s supporters have largely accepted the campaign´s assessment of the compromises necessary to win, offering only gentle prodding. The fact that the Republicans have managed to turn New Orleans to their advantage should put a decisive end to this blind obedience.

 Republicans have a better attitude toward their candidate. When they don´t like McCain´s positions, they simply change them. Take the hottest-button issue of the campaign: offshore oil drilling. Just four months ago, it was not even on the radar. During the Republican primary, the issue barely came up, and when it did, McCain did not support it. None of this bothered former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his newly minted American Solutions for Winning the Future.

Gingrich waited patiently for what his party loves most: a crisis. It arrived in May, when oil approached $130 a barrel. First came a petition to lower gas prices by opening up domestic drilling(nonsense). Next was a poll, packed with laughably leading questions:

"Some people have suggested that, to combat the rising cost of energy and reduce dependence on foreign energy sources, the United States should use more of its own domestic energy reserves, including the oil and coal it already has here in the United States. Do you support  There was always a risk attached to making offshore drilling the centerpiece of the McCain campaign, since it is not nearly as safe as its advocates claim. Environmentalists have been trying to point this out, but nothing makes the case quite as forcefully as a Category 5 hurricane rocking oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, forcing evacuations and raising the specter of a serious spill.

 Gustav was one of those rare moments when political arguments are made by reality, not rhetoric. It was the time to simply point and say: "This is why we oppose more drilling." It was also the time to recall that during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the official Minerals Management Service report found more than 100 accidents leading to a total of 743,400 gallons of oil spilled throughout the region. To put that figure in perspective, 100,000 gallons is classified as a "major spill." If one is feeling particularly bold, a Category 5 hurricane is also an opportune time to mention that scientists see a link between heavier storms and warming ocean temperatures-warmed in part by the fossil fuels being extracted from those fallible platforms.

 Obama was not able to make these kinds of arguments when Gustav hit. That´s because his campaign had made another "strategic" decision: to compromise on offshore oil drilling. Again a vacuum that had been opened up was rapidly filled by the Republicans, who instantly (and absurdly) linked the hurricane to the need for "energy security." The morning after Gustav made landfall, Bush called for more drilling.

Earlier, McCain had visited the hurricane zone with his new runningmate, Sarah Palin, whose sole prior claim to national fame was telling cable shows that "we need to drill, drill, drill."

 In moments of crisis, it is possible to speak hard truths with great force and clarity. But when the truth has gone silent, lies, boldly told, work almost as well.

 This article was first published in The Nation.

 Don't forget to check out Naomi's Facebook and MySpace pages.

 To ensure you continue to receive Naomi Klein's Newsletter, please include newsletter@naomiklein.org in your email program's address book or whitelist.