The Collective Wisdom Of Canadians

Posted on Saturday, September 20 at 14:32 by robertjb

As polls show a softening support for Harper’s conservatives it may well be Canadians are once again resorting to our collective wisdom and we are heading toward another minority government. As one Globe and Mail reader commented “We cannot afford another minority government.” This reader is dead wrong as under the circumstances we have no other option.

 

First of all we should not make the silly assumption that minority governments are necessarily bad. Canada has had eleven of them, some good, and some bad.

 

Where Lester Pearson’s minority Liberal government brought in some of Canada’s most important social legislation; Jean Chretien’s Liberal majorities systematically gutted social programs with finance minister Paul Martin presiding. 

 

Secondly, we should remind ourselves that there are many countries around the world that are governed by minority/ coalition governments on an ongoing basis and they really do work. They do though require a mature commitment on the part of politicians as they must practice such noble skills as compromise, consensus building, moderation and a collegial approach to working with other parties in the coalition.

 

Canada’s political elite can no longer make the assumption that majority government is their entitlement and they should start developing the necessary mindset and skills to work collegially with other parties to bring about effective government.

 

Stephen Harper has called Parliament “dysfunctional” but this has more to do with his managerial skills and attitude towards Parliament. Minority government requires some sophisticated political skills and if he wants to hang around he should get used to the idea a majority is beyond his grasp -largely because Canadians are offended by his strident partisanship.

 

Parliament does become dysfunctional mainly in majority situations. Going back to the time of Pierre Trudeau, power and decision making has been increasingly concentrated in the PMO. With a majority government Parliament merely becomes a rubber stamp for decrees issued from the PMO.

 

Under Harper this has been even more so; suffering a severe shortage of political talent for key cabinet posts, having a controlling nature and being “handicapped” with a minority the PMO has become an airless bunker.

 

A minority government actually serves to revitalize and make Parliament relevant as parties do indeed have to water their wine and take a more measured and less partisan approach to legislation.  

 

Canadians have good reason to be distrustful of majority governments as both successive Liberal and Conservative governments have used majorities to radically alter the country over the past few decades in the form of:

 

-        massive corporate tax cuts

-        the end of universal benefits for children

-        repeated attacks on Old Age Security benefits

-        deep cuts for health, education and social assistance

-        removal of federal support for affordable housing

-        gutting of unemployment insurance

-        off loading of training and welfare to the provinces

-        the NAFTA

-        harmonization to US standards in health, the environment, national security and military security

-        North American Union

 

Thanks to our two national parties Canada has been suffering incremental losses of sovereignty for the past forty years. Our political elites are contemptuous of the public good and the concept of Canada as an independent country. They cannot grasp the simple concept that being Canadian is not automatically anti-American; nor can they distinguish between friendship and servitude in CanadaUS relations. They are dumbstruck by what they see as the infallibility of the American empire which is proving to be very fallible. 

 

Harper’s perverse contempt allows him to want to lead a majority government in a country he does not love or believe in as expressed in a speech in June 1997 at a Montreal meeting of the Council for National Policy, a right wing US think tank:  

 

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051213/elxn_harper_speech_text_051214/20051214/

 

At a time in his life when he was outside active politics and he assumed his speech would not have wide distribution he mocks and belittles Canada to a foreign audience in a vindictive, sarcastic and highly partisan manner.

 

It is true in both Canada and the United States the public good is being abandoned for the sake of the corporate good. Whether we are dealing with Republicans, Democrats, Liberals or Conservatives they have blended into bipartisanship, paying lip service to the public good but in service to the corporate good.  As the social welfare state sinks out of sight the corporate welfare state emerges full in full bloom.

 

The US government is now spending tens of billions of dollars bailing out Wall Street profiteers wallowing in their greed, unethical behavior and the utter lack of self-regulation which they promised if government stood back from regulating them.     

 

These events are disastrous for Harper as the Republican style of conservatism he wants to import to Canada is coming apart at the seams for all to see. This financial meltdown came about because of deregulation and privatization-two of the central tenets of neoconservatism, neoliberalism and the market driven economy.          

 

With our political parties contemptuous of the public good and their first loyalty being to the corporate good Canadians face an imposing challenge. One of the few weapons we have at our disposal is to continue sending minority governments to Ottawa; to continue exercising our collective wisdom and at least slowing down the devolution of the country.   

 

Our political elites require remedial education, upgrading and a new focus. They should be sent back to Ottawa reprimanded, told to get down to business, to show greater respect for the Canadian electorate and to get back to basics. Such basics include fixed term elections (as promised) and a workable system of proportionate representation. Most important, it is time to recalibrate their loyalties and desist from their treasonable behavior.

 

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RickW
    Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:57 pm
    Yet, while the public perceives themselves as having only two choices, between Tweedledum and Tweedledee, we will never rid ourselves of this destructive FPTP "who wants to be dictator for a term?" governance, and adopt a far more rational PR system, which will force cooperation among the parties.

    That reader who commented that "We cannot afford another minority government" is one of those who savours virtual dictatorship -- and very likely doesn't even know it. He represents that portion of the general population who wants all decisions made for them, yet reserves the 'right' to bitch about those he doesn't like.

  2. by Rural
    Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:02 pm
    Indeed our consecutive governments seem to have lost the realization that ALL the MPs from ALL partys were elected to represent us, NOT just those of the governing party. Be it a minority or majority it is long overdue that they all embrace a cooperative aproach within our parlimentry system. Failure to do so will, some will say already has, result in the end of our demorcracy as we know it!
    Great article, that one is a keeper for forwarding to my fellow Canadians.

  3. Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:50 am
    We should always have minority government the Prime Minister Office as way to much power. These member of parliament have no way of represent us.. if they vote in parliament for the electorate and it opposes the PMO they get tossed out.. is this what we call democracy. When a Canadian Government is elected with a majority it is called (dictatorship) plan and simple think ago it for about 10 seconds. Now I see why they keep promising an elected senate and when the election is over they never speak about it again as if it was taboo. How blind I have been all these years.( I truly believe that the younger generation of today knows what is going on with our Canadian Politics and the Prime Ministers Office. The reason they choose not to vote is because they know it will make no difference which party is elected. Canada will remain the same absolute power from the Prime Ministers Office.(Dictatorship)It doesn't matter you will not heard because your elected MP cannot speak for you all decisions are made in the PMO the only you can make a difference if we elect a minoty government. Ideals please as to how this could done.
    I always wondered why Canada as never evolved into a Republic. After all these years we are still under British Rule still part of the Commonwealth. It all comes from the Prime Ministers Office (Dictatorship)It will not allow us to mature into a great country. It will not let go of the power.
    We need to find way to control who get elected. We must find way to stop any majority Government. Trudeau said a long time ago that the prime minister office as way to much power. SO LETS TAKE THIS POWER ON...

  4. Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:11 am
    "RickW" said
    Yet, while the public perceives themselves as having only two choices, between Tweedledum and Tweedledee, we will never rid ourselves of this destructive FPTP "who wants to be dictator for a term?" governance, and adopt a far more rational PR system, which will force cooperation among the parties.

    That reader who commented that "We cannot afford another minority government" is one of those who savours virtual dictatorship -- and very likely doesn't even know it. He represents that portion of the general population who wants all decisions made for them, yet reserves the 'right' to bitch about those he doesn't like.


    Minorotiy governments are ok as long as the opposition has teeth. Dictatorships have to be led by smart people. None of the four twits we have to choose from fit that bill. Vote spoilt ballot or none of the above.

  5. by RickW
    Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:20 am
    "Crankster" said
    Dictatorships have to be led by smart people


    Then we are safe if Harper forms a majority -- unless you count cunning as being smart.

    As for voting "spoilt ballot" or "none of the above", that is just what Harper is counting on to get his majority..............

  6. Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:34 pm
    Well, until there is the radical restructuring/ democratization of the ruling class controlled economy and political structure in this country, indeed throughout capitalism everywhere, I certainly favour the "more amenable to public pressure" minority governance result of recent years in this country.Indeed, I favour this over any other majority "vanguardist" party option out there.

    That said, I still am of the mind that the far better outcome of this sham electoral and economic democracy system, such as would throw the system into a kind of attention demanding crisis of greatest opportunity here, is that in addition to the near 40% of the population that has already walked away from it and refuses to participate, self included, that this number be increased to a majority of the population. Or failing that, to as near a 50/50 participation/nonparticipation split as possible. To which end I will commit myself over this federal electoral period.

    It is time for the sham, actual ruling class control of the electoral/political regime to be addressed and removed from the "formal" electoral system. It is likewise time that "the people" be organized, and a powerful "street democracy" movement be created, which has as its end objective, a popular democratization of the economy, at least its major corporate enterprises, and upon that principal base of popular control of the economy, the evolution of a new political democracy built around a PR system of representation and governance. Even one free of all vanguardist political parties would be my personal preference, but perhaps too far a reach right now. 8) )

    And lest ye think this is all too far fetched a notion, watch the growing crisis of the economic system, its further collapse will change the dynamics of everything. (Even Real News recently had an interesting piece around this idea of the need to create a new economic democracy.See Below.)

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?opti ... umival=845

    A New Time of Radical Change Opportunity is Upon Us.

  7. Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:53 pm
    There is a way we can make sure we always have a minority it will take work and it will people. This is only for conversation Let's say... call It( Coliation to elect Responsible and Acountable Government within Canada)including provinces. What we do is go to every Ridings and recommend the best canditate in that riding that would do is job to represent the voter. And explain why they should vote for this individual. I truly believe you would attract all the younger generation because they know ther vote will count.
    I am not sure the number of seat in Parliament all I know it that it should be split between. Liberals Conservative NDP Green we can even have an Independent. End result always a minority and that it would take two Parties to call an election.
    I know some will not like this but people will see that all we are doing is taking the power away from the PMO and returning it to the people where it belongs. They will have to learn to work together because next election will be the same.
    I believe this will work if someone had the B-alls to get it going. It would take lot's of work because we would have to explain why we recommend this Candiate for this riding... Can you see the picture. This would work I am sure..

  8. Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:07 pm
    Coyoteman... you seemed like a very smart person what do think about (coliation to elect Responsible and Acountable Government in Canada) That could keep you motivated to vote when you know you make this country a better place for all Canadians. A Government that work for people. A government that would take on bureaucracy and place them right side up.

  9. Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:37 am
    What we do is go to every Ridings and recommend the best canditate in that riding that would do is job to represent the voter. And explain why they should vote for this individual. I truly believe you would attract all the younger generation because they know ther vote will count.

    My basic problem with this concept is I'm not really sure I trust "the younger generation" anymore than I trust my own "older generation", frankly. (And I'm 70. No shit.) Which is just for starters.

    Secondly, and the really big one is, your Coalition to Elect Responsible and Accountable Government sounds too much like just another "vanguard" political party, who also all think, or profess anyway, that they are making "this country a better place."

    I think it is really more complicated than that. And the first thing that has to happen is there has to be a big "sea change" occur in the country first, that causes people to first, seriously begin to question the status quo system and withdraw their allegiance/co-operation from it. It's coming, and minority governments partly reflect that, I think. So does a huge percentage of the population that doesn't participate in the electoral system at all, even to marking their X on a ballot. Which if this process continues and grows, leads to the next stage of development that has to occur, I think. Younger and more radical elements, though increasingly over time, not just them, have to begin to move onto the streets, into the union halls, environmental, poverty, women and community movements, coming together, creating concencus, and demanding change.

    I have no interest at all in prolonging the life of either the economic or political status quo in this country. My interest is in ending and transforming it, and putting an end to the bullshit.

  10. Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:01 am
    "coyoteman"]What we do is go to every Ridings and recommend the best canditate in that riding that would do is job to represent the voter. And explain why they should vote for this individual. I truly believe you would attract all the younger generation because they know ther vote will count.


    My basic problem with this proposal, as a gut instinct is, I'm not really sure I trust "the younger generation" anymore than I trust my own "older generation", frankly. At this point in time anyway. (And I'm 70. :D No shit.) Which is just for starters.

    Secondly, and the really big negative one is, your Coalition to Elect Responsible and Accountable Government sounds too much like just another "vanguard" political party trying to win seats and serve the ruling class, making "the system" work, which vanguardists also all attempt to do, or profess anyway, that they are making "this country a better place."

    I think it is really more complicated than what you propose, and the other vanguardists... (Hmmm. Maybe more simple actually.) And the first thing that has to happen is there has to be a really big "sea change" occur in the country first, in the mass of peoples' attitudes, that causes them to first, seriously and fundamentally begin to question the status quo system and withdraw their allegiance/co-operation from it, even where that is only passively given, as is typically the case. It's coming, and the continued existence of minority governments partly reflect that, I think. So does the existence of a huge percentage of the population that doesn't participate in the electoral system at all, even to the extremely limited extent of marking their X on a ballot. Which if this process continues and grows, as I expect it will, leads to the next stage of development that has to occur. Radicalized younger and older elements, though increasingly over time, not just them, have to begin to move onto the streets, into the union halls, to environmental, poverty, women and community movements, coming together, creating consensus, and demanding change, occupying and creating worker-community management models in the corporate workplaces and creating alternatives to the capitalist market delivery of goods and services.

    There is more to it than just that, of course, but that is roughly where and how it starts, and begins to grow and mature, transforming people and society, and creating a new and different marketplace as it evolves.

    I have no interest at all in prolonging the life of either the economic or political status quo in this country. I made my decision long ago, to participate no more than I had to in it, to survive and feed my family. My interest is in ending and transforming it, and putting an end to the bullshit.

  11. Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:50 am
    I hear what is being said,yet,it seems to me that it is still a pussyfoot way around the crap being spewed by todays type of government(s).
    Our 'democratic' system is way to heavy with the rich fat cats drool and money. It solely centered around the dollar value of votes rather than the people.
    The people need to force government to change and act responsably. This election call was not responsable. It is a waste of tax payers money in a time when the taxpayer is being hosed by outrageous taxes,low wages,and a gov that just don't get it. Democracy was supposed to give people a say in government,now it is time to say we have had enough of the parties inviolved and elect a party that has a vision for the future of canada and not just the commercial future.
    A spoiled ballot vote shows the gov that the parties we have a choice of aren't worth the trouble. I have yet to see a party put forth an election platform that takes on the major issues and spells out a plan. They all kiss the issues off.

  12. Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:01 am
    "Crankster" said
    They all kiss the issues off.



    Come on Crankster, think of the Kittens! Kittens are a big hot-topic in this election!

    PM-splashgraphic-Kittens.jpg

    http://pm.gc.ca/eng/feature.asp?pageId=73

  13. by RickW
    Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:58 pm
    This Conservative "government" is deliberately targeting such aspects as INSITE, in a deliberate diversion attempt to take peoples' thoughts away from the pandemic that is the illegal drug business around the world.

    This Conservative "government" has no interest in stopping the illegal drug business around the world, because too many people are making too much money (and if not these people directly, then their contacts, friends, relatives, associates, et al).

    Moreover, this Conservative "government" realizes that the whole of society would have to change, in order to actually put a halt to the illegal drug business. You have to ask yourself just why the so-called "war on drugs" is such a spectacular failure, year afdter year (and at a cost that would relieve poverty inn a very large chunk of the world). This Conservative "government" has no interest in making fundamental changes to society, because (as Coyotemen notes) life has been very good to those in charge of things.

    And the voters that this Conservative "government" is targeting are those who think that drugs are used by the ne'er-do-wells, slackards, and down 'n' outs in places such as the Downtown East Side. These people think that the down 'n' outers are responsible for all the crime in Canada, while they remain safely ensconced behind their middleclass blinders.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news