The country the world forgot - again
By Kevin Myers
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 21/04/2002
Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan , probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region.
And as always, Canada will bury its dead, just as the rest of the world, as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.. It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored.
Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped Glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.
That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts.
For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.
Yet it's purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada 's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.
Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, it's unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the 'British.'
The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone.
Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth largest air force in the world. The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time.
Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.
So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British.
It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.
Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces.
Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.
Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular non-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.
So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun. It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.
Lest we forget.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2002/04/21/do2106.xml

Well, the greater accuracy probably is that the US Empire and Euro-Zionist occupiers of Palestine use each other to their mutual, symbiotic benefit. The Euro-Zionists are still attempting, basically, to displace the Palestinian "natives" to reclaim what they imagine to be theirs, and in that, they need the military and financial largesse and protection umbrella of the US Empire. (The Palestinians are to be made to pay with their land, for the Holocaust crimes of Fascist Europe.) The latter US Empire ambition being, of course, domination of the Middle East, which the Zionists help to keep de-stabilized and vulnerable, whilst they go about militarily coveting other Arab lands and their, especially, oil resources. (The cry of "Democracy" is, of course, just a whitewash. The Empire has many despotic friends it tolerates, so long as they co-operate with them, not the least of which is the Saudi Royal Family, and the Jordanian Royal Family, and even for a very long time, whilst he stayed on his leash, Saddam Hussein.)
As for Canada, we are going about simply doing what we have done since the days of the British Empire, and now for the US Empire, doing their bidding generally, and when pressed, helping them fight their foreign imperial wars.
Canada is just a "Suck State"... still, with no signs of it ending anytime soon. Some have not inaccurately called us a "Whore State". "Here, I will spread my legs and let you take my resources-, in exchange for your coin, of course."
What? Did you think we do it for love?
Hopefully, the country will eventually become something more of which we can be proud, but the historical record is not promising.
Enter Afghanistan. Send over more of our working class lads to be slaughtered for the US Empire cause. They are young, too often unknowing of the complexities of the world they carry a gun into (as I once was, forever ago), and are easily led about to do as they are told.
Were that what it is/was really about. (Though WW2 and the war against fascism had a somewhat more noble resonance, no doubt.)
Most of it, however, is simply bullshit "sentimentality", and the need, because of the terrible blood sacrifice, to make something more noble than it actually was. Mostly, it was just the tragic waste of youg working-class men's lives, ostensibly fighting for their "pure" ideals, but really manipulated cannon fodder serving the competing imperialist factions of capitalism, for the right to control the world and its resources.
I remember these young men alright, but in a real way, not a sentimentalist one. I was in the military, and though I was fortunate enough to not have to actually go to war, understand what these young men were really like very well. And I gave up on sentimentality a long time ago.
It's the reality of it all we really need to come to grips with, whatever the cannon fodder generation at the time thought, and/or still think of what they were doing-, otherwise we working class folks will forever be doomed to repeat history's bullshit.
War sentimentality! Bah, humbug!!
Just ask Ford and the elder Bush how lucrative thgat sentimentality was.
However, few of us can resist decades of brain-washing, even if we suspect it's there, and the simplest manifestation of which is miltary service. And as long as there remains a "need" for a military, I won't "diss" the people who serve (and have served) in it.
http://www.terry-kelly.com/message.htm
They fought and some died for their homeland
They fought and some died now it’s our land
Look at his little child, there’s no fear in her eyes
Could he not show respect for other dads who have died?
Take two minutes, would you mind?
It’s a pittance of time
For the boys and the girls who went over
In peace may they rest, may we never forget why they died.
It’s a pittance of time
God forgive me for wanting to strike him
Give me strength so as not to be like him
My heart pounds in my breast, fingers pressed to my lips
My throat wants to bawl out, my tongue barely resists
But two minutes I will bide
It’s a pittance of time
For the boys and the girls who went over
In peace may they rest, may we never forget why they died.
It’s a pittance of time
Read the letters and poems of the heroes at home
They have casualties, battles, and fears of their own
There’s a price to be paid if you go, if you stay
Peace is fought for and won in numerous ways
Take two minutes would you mind?
It’s a pittance of time
For the boys and the girls all over
May we never forget our young become vets
At the end of the line it’s a pittance of time
It takes courage to fight in your own war
It takes courage to fight someone else’s war
Our peacekeepers tell of their own living hell
They bring hope to foreign lands that the hatemongers can’t kill.
Take two minutes, would you mind?
It’s a pittance of time
For the boys and the girls who go over
In peacetime our best still don battle dress
And lay their lives on the line.
It’s a pittance of time
In Peace may they rest, lest we forget why they died.
Take a pittance of time
However, few of us can resist decades of brain-washing, even if we suspect it's there, and the simplest manifestation of which is miltary service. And as long as there remains a "need" for a military, I won't "diss" the people who serve (and have served) in it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1TuDpDHAJM
It's a complicated issue. Emotions cloud the subject. And emotions/sentimentality always make it difficult to get at the real truth of the matter.
Coyote
For want of a better description, call it societal obligations, or "duty". Of this "duty", there are always those who will benefit from it in ways large and small, and seemingly without reciprocation. This is the pragmatic truth of nearly all societies in thw world.
The best we can hope for (until The Enlightenment -- The Sequel comes along) is that those who prey (consciously or otherwise) on this sense of obligation do not become overly avaricious, for it is at this point that revolutions occur.
I suspect that we are some distance from revolution, but momentum is inexorably propelling us in that direction, and there is nothing on the horizon that seems inclined to stop it - repress it perhaps, but not stop it.
Thank you Gentlemen, for demonstrating how easy it is to forget that some people are willing to put themselves in harm's way to protect their country.
The article is quite beautiful. As an American I have nothing but praise for Canada's unstinting bravery and self-sacrifice for freedom.
[quote="Dr Caleb":76lsmk50]Thank you Gentlemen, for demonstrating how easy it is to forget that some people are willing to put themselves in harm's way to protect their country.
The article is quite beautiful. As an American I have nothing but praise for Canada's unstinting bravery and self-sacrifice for freedom.
This is September 1st, 2009, the 70th anniversary of Germany invading Poland, the start of the worst conflagration in human history. A war in which Canada - as well as others - distinguished itself.