Re: Revisiting NAFTA threatens oil sales to U.S.: Cannon, Nov. 15.
Newly minted Foreign Affairs minister Lawrence Cannon recently expressed his fear that "revisiting NAFTA", the controversial trade deal with the U.S. would, "... threaten (Canadian) oil sales to the U.S.
His fears are somewhat justified, but only in the narrow confines of the existing deal, which was designed to be flexible. It is not heresy to suggest that Canada needs new markets for its surplus crude oil and refined petroleum products.
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/letters/story.html?id=4a831209-41fd-4241-b36f-1a2701621c36

I think a side deal eliminating section 11 of nafta would be a good first step , and leave us to deal with the rest later. Obama would agree that.
Brent
Self sufficiency at all levels, not only in oil, which is of questionable value, is always the best "wealth creation", provided we have logical definitions of what "wealth" really means ?
Ed Deak.
Again, I agree entirely with Ed. And the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Empirically, the destruction of "self-sufficiency" is the exact result that occurs everywhere, including here in Canada, no less than anywhere else, despite our relative richness of national resources.
Some levels of global trade there will always be. But all the worlds folks should be free to do that from the diktats of entirely their own perceived national social interest, with whatever levels of "protectionism" they feel is required for the protection of their national community/economy.
It is the bloated corruption/speculation of capitalism within its globalized, so-called "free market" economy that has led us to hear, the gathering collapse of all economies everywhere.
HOW can one make some tangible sense at all of the wasted trillions? Since we are talking about astronomical magnitudes, I addressed this question to a close friend who is Professor of Astrophysics at London Univesity. His answer was that I should point out that one trillion alone is roughly one hundred times the age of our universe. Now, on the scale of the same magnitude the regularly understated official figure of the American debt, on its own, amounts in our days to more than 10 trillion. That is, one thousand times the age of our universe.
But let me quote you a short passage from a Japanese publication. It reads like this:
"How much speculative money is moving around the world? According to a Mitsubishi UFJ Securities analysis, the size of the global `real economy', in which goods and services are produced and traded, is estimated at $48.1 trillion... On the other hand, the size of the global `financial economy', the total amount of stocks, securities and deposits, adds up to $151.8 trillion. The financial economy thus has swollen to more than three times the size of the real economy, growing especially rapidly during the past two decades. The gap is as large as $100 trillion. An analyst involved in this estimation said that about half the amount, $50 trillion is scarcely necessary for the real economy. Fifty trillion dollars are worth well over 5,000 trillion yen, too big a number for me to actually comprehend.""
And just to give us some historical comparison to the incredible magnitudes of cash being thrown around so casually by the apologists for capitalism:
These above quotes re the magnitudes of capital and real markets, and the levels of speculation within them, taken from:
http://www.herramienta.com.ar/modules.p ... le&sid=629