Our Oil Self-Sufficiency Equals Prosperity

Posted on Tuesday, November 18 at 12:31 by NAUWATCH

Re: Revisiting NAFTA threatens oil sales to U.S.: Cannon, Nov. 15.

Newly minted Foreign Affairs minister Lawrence Cannon recently expressed his fear that "revisiting NAFTA", the controversial trade deal with the U.S. would, "... threaten (Canadian) oil sales to the U.S.

His fears are somewhat justified, but only in the narrow confines of the existing deal, which was designed to be flexible. It is not heresy to suggest that Canada needs new markets for its surplus crude oil and refined petroleum products.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/letters/story.html?id=4a831209-41fd-4241-b36f-1a2701621c36

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:04 pm
    What a laugh! The US would rather have oil coming from a good neighbour like Canada as opposed to opening more oil wars in the middle east, Africa, South America and Caspian Sea. Bottom line: They`ll ALWAYS need Canadian resources, NAFTA or not! So, I say, scrap NAFTA, and whatever oil imports from Canada the US cuts down on, we merely up their price! Not to mention, instead of Atlantic Canada importing oil, we could pipe more from the west to the east coast! This would be cheaper for the Maritime provinces too. Not to mention, there are many countries in the world who need oil! Let`s make a deal. But we first must free ourselves from our Washington imperial masters!

  2. Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:20 pm
    A deal that gives USanians priority over Canadians when it comes to supply, and forces us to continue the supply to the US, even if it means leaving Canadians frezing in the dark ,needs to be changed. Diesel in Mexico was $65 cents a litre when it was $1.60 in Canada. Mexico refused to sign away its sovereignty in this way, when they signed their version of NAFTA. Canadian oil is cheaper in the US than it is in Cnada. If the reverse was true , then what kind of advantage would that give Canadian manufacturers. They should get first crack at our resources not giving foreigners an advantage when it comes to the price of our oil. That is a surender of our sovereignty.
    I think a side deal eliminating section 11 of nafta would be a good first step , and leave us to deal with the rest later. Obama would agree that.
    Brent

  3. Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:00 pm
    The main purpose of the NAFTA and all phony free trade agreements is the destruction of all levels of self sufficiency and throw people to the mercy of the multinational corporate mafia.

    Self sufficiency at all levels, not only in oil, which is of questionable value, is always the best "wealth creation", provided we have logical definitions of what "wealth" really means ?

    Ed Deak.

  4. Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:31 pm
    The main purpose of the NAFTA and all phony free trade agreements is the destruction of all levels of self sufficiency and throw people to the mercy of the multinational corporate mafia.Wrote Ed Deak.


    Again, I agree entirely with Ed. And the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Empirically, the destruction of "self-sufficiency" is the exact result that occurs everywhere, including here in Canada, no less than anywhere else, despite our relative richness of national resources.

    Some levels of global trade there will always be. But all the worlds folks should be free to do that from the diktats of entirely their own perceived national social interest, with whatever levels of "protectionism" they feel is required for the protection of their national community/economy.

    It is the bloated corruption/speculation of capitalism within its globalized, so-called "free market" economy that has led us to hear, the gathering collapse of all economies everywhere.

    "Can you think of a greater indictment for a pretendedly unsurpassable system of econproduction and societal reproduction than the one which - at the height of its productive power - is producing a global food crisis, and the suffering of countless millions inseparable from it all over the world? That is the nature of the system which is expected to be saved now at all cost, including the currently "dished out" astronomical economic cost.

    HOW can one make some tangible sense at all of the wasted trillions? Since we are talking about astronomical magnitudes, I addressed this question to a close friend who is Professor of Astrophysics at London Univesity. His answer was that I should point out that one trillion alone is roughly one hundred times the age of our universe. Now, on the scale of the same magnitude the regularly understated official figure of the American debt, on its own, amounts in our days to more than 10 trillion. That is, one thousand times the age of our universe.

    But let me quote you a short passage from a Japanese publication. It reads like this:

    "How much speculative money is moving around the world? According to a Mitsubishi UFJ Securities analysis, the size of the global `real economy', in which goods and services are produced and traded, is estimated at $48.1 trillion... On the other hand, the size of the global `financial economy', the total amount of stocks, securities and deposits, adds up to $151.8 trillion. The financial economy thus has swollen to more than three times the size of the real economy, growing especially rapidly during the past two decades. The gap is as large as $100 trillion. An analyst involved in this estimation said that about half the amount, $50 trillion is scarcely necessary for the real economy. Fifty trillion dollars are worth well over 5,000 trillion yen, too big a number for me to actually comprehend.""


    And just to give us some historical comparison to the incredible magnitudes of cash being thrown around so casually by the apologists for capitalism:

    It is indeed very difficult even to comprehend, not to mention to justify, as our capital-apologetic politicians and bankers do, the astronomical sums of parasitic speculation accumulated to the magnitude corresponding to 500,000 times the age of our universe. If you wish to have another measure about the magnitude involved, just imagine an unlucky accountant from Roman times, who is asked nothing more than simply to chalk up on his blackboard the figure of 5,000 trillion yen, in Roman numbers. He would be in total despair. He simply could not do it. And even if he had at his disposal Arab numbers, which he could not have had, even in that case he would need as many as 17 zeros after the number 5 in order to write down the cifre in question.


    These above quotes re the magnitudes of capital and real markets, and the levels of speculation within them, taken from:

    http://www.herramienta.com.ar/modules.p ... le&sid=629



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news