What Would A Coalition Government Mean For NAFTA And The SPP?

Posted on Thursday, December 04 at 13:03 by NAUWATCH

Stephen Harper once again failed to secure a majority mandate in the last election. In the process, he has managed to bring the Liberal and New Democratic Party (NDP) together, with plans to form a coalition if the minority Conservative government is defeated on a non-confidence vote. Harper has shown an unwillingness to work with the opposition parties and assumed that he could bully his agenda through another minority parliament. He essentially backed the opposition into a corner with plans to remove some of their funding. A move to form a coalition government has been called undemocratic and nothing more than a power grab, but many would have to agree that the last thing Canada needs is another election. A Liberal-NDP coalition should be given a chance to govern. Many see this as an opportunity to have a functional parliament, which could serve to curb the apathy that many Canadians feel towards their politicians. It could also be used to further press for renegotiating NAFTA, and could finally lead to a parliamentary debate on the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-Would-a-Coalition-Gov-by-Dana-Gabriel-081204-586.html

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RickW
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:35 pm
    I am not sure if a coalition government, led by the likes of Michael Ignatieff, would have any influence on NAU and SPP, but this is what we can expect (if it's not all ready here -- remember how the cops clamped down on demonstrators at the SPP meetings?) for the average citizen if and when it comes about:
    http://www.crossroad.to:80/articles2/08/swat-team.htm

  2. Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:09 am
    It appears as if the SPP is dead, but the goal of deeper continental integration lives on in both the Liberal party and the Conservatives. They just might have to go about it in a different way. The struggling economy could possibly be used to further promote such an agenda.

  3. Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:47 am
    It was Ignatieff's hot , passionate love and admiration for the US that gave the Liberals the "Anyone but Ignatief" movement that got Dion elected. With Yank Ignatief as their leader, nationalist Liberals who want no part of his proposed treason, will have no choice but to vote NDP, the only party left that puts Canadian interests ahead of US expansionisnm. This is a good time for the NDP to start making a bigger issue of the proposed treason by Liberals and Conservative. Yank Ignatief's joining forces with the Tories is a clear demonstration of how much they have in common, and how little difference there is between them. Canada will drop the illusion of there being two right wing options inLiberals Vs Tories and Canadian politics will become a clearer choice between right and left, stars and stripes, or sovereignty.
    brent

  4. Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:32 pm
    It was Ignatieff's hot , passionate love and admiration for the US that gave the Liberals the "Anyone but Ignatief" movement that got Dion elected.


    Can not someone both admire the US and promote Canadian sovereignty? There is plenty to admire in the American experiment. And I'd rather have Canada led by someone who admired the US than someone like Trudeau, who never met a Marxist dictator he didn't like.

    One doesn't have to be anti-US to be pro-Canada, unless of course you're a Canadian nationalist (a misnomer really, since true nationalism is about love of your own country, not hatred of another).

  5. by RickW
    Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:24 am
    And strangely enough, "individualist", Trudeau was a self-admitted continentalist.....

  6. Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:40 pm
    "RickW" said
    And strangely enough, "individualist", Trudeau was a self-admitted continentalist.....


    Compared to who? James Laxer? Mel Hurtig?

    Thanks though for the good laugh. I'm sure that if Pierre ever did make such an admission, he was being ironic. The arrogant and pretentious ofter do that.

  7. by RickW
    Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:42 am
    Denial ain't just a river in Egypt...............too bad you are as ignorant of history as you are of everything else.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news