The next few weeks will be crucial to decide the national debate, a debate that has already been partially hijacked by Conservative talking points and an emphasis on national unity.
The next few weeks will be crucial to decide the national debate, a debate that has already been partially hijacked by Conservative talking points and an emphasis on national unity.
The coalition is undemocratic in spirit because these politicians are making a power-hungry grab for power, with no respect to the people. They never asked the people, they never consulted the people. They care only for themselves, their careers and their bruised egos from losing the last election. Their motivations alone should prevent you from supporting them. Their official reasons are so lame, no-one is stupid enough to believe it, and this will be proven when the next tabled budget will address their concerns and they will still vote against it. Why? Because they don't care for the people. If they do, then they would have asked them in the first place.
As for polls, things are changing too quickly to predict where everything will end up. Unless you count pro-Con talk radio in Calgary, which is hardly scientific.
So Harper didn't make a grab for power by trying to cut all the other parties off at the knees by cutting their funding?
And who is Harper helping by shutting down parliament? He's clearly looking out for number 1, himself. Not you and me.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada ... id=1024055
He's Prime Minister, not President.
Crap! Here we go again......You just don't understand (or care to understand apparently) how our Parliamentary system works. When a voter casts a vote, (s)he is voting for the person running to sit as MP in a riding. (S)he is voting for a party or a Prime Minister. When that person is elected, if that person so chooses, he or she or MAY NOT form alliances with other MPs. But for all intents and purposes, that person is fully independent, and the condition under which (s)he acts as an MP, allows her or him a certain autonomy. Otherwise, the constituents would be voting on every move the MP makes.
Consequently, that MP, in representing a riding, conducts his or her business with that in mind. In this instance, a number of MPs in an alliance, have decided that the best way to represent their constituents, is to form a coalition to give them a working majority in Parliament.
we were voting for a party, there would be no names on the ballot, only poltical parties.
Now what's so hard about that -- except maybe your understanding of politics 101 in this country.
Anyone who reads or believes these "polls" should work for the self-serving piece of garbage propagandists who are controlling the mainstream media.
"The average opposition against the Coalition is 60+ %. Respect the will of the people, it's that simple. Any politician who does otherwise serves himself by definition."
A politician serving himself by definition? Yeah, like a politician who suspends Parliament for six weeks because he has his fat ass up against the wall due to his own arrogance and incompetence?
http://www.62percentmajority.ca/home
http://www.progressivecoalition.ca/
Sorry, can't support your dictator.
http://www.tranquileye.com/stockwell/harper.php