Premier Danny Williams has done something the left in Canada has struggled to do in recent years - focus attention on trade agreements that rank corporate privileges over the rights of citizens.
The expropriation of AbitibiBowater's access to timber and water came at a time when citizens everywhere are questioning the world economic order and the lack of rules governing capital and corporations.
Threats by Abitibi-Bowater to sue the Canadian government because the province of Newfoundland and Labrador acted in the public interest have served to highlight the very real problems with trade agreements.
By taking back the "people's resources" - the water and timber leases that had been issued to the operators of the Grand Falls pulp and paper mill in exchange for industrial development - Williams acted to uphold the public interest over the corporate interest.
AbitibiBowater is claiming that its "investor rights" granted under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have been violated.

And to think that certain so-called "individualists" called Trudeau bad.......
Ed Deak.
Oh please. The National Energy Program was Trudeau bullying Western Canada for the benefit (and entertainment) of Central Canada...and his party. Mulroney was right to sweep aside all that belligerent nationalism, although he couldn't resist the urge to screw over Western Canada himself (the CF-18 contracts). Of course, shifting power away from the Toronto/Quebec axis required the merging of Reform/Alliance with the old Tories and the formation of Canada's only true national party.
What it comes down to is that the resources were Alberta's, and Trudeau attempted to nationalize the entire industry so that he could force Alberta to sell its oil to Southern Ontario for far less than the world price. It was a transfer of wealth conducted to help ensure that a region that didn't vote Liberal didn't acquire economic power.
For me, it comes down to the simple question of whether Trudeau would have created the NEP if the oil had been in Quebec instead of Alberta. If you can honestly say that you believe that Trudeau would have still done so under those circumstances, then your defense of the NEP is at least legitimate.
How absurd! But then, we have to take into account the source......
Alberta is not an independent nation. The resources belong to all Canadians. It was/is the C.R.A.P. marriage that defacto declared (in their effort to break up the country) that the resources of the provinces belong to the provinces.
The fact that most of Canadians live in the centre of the country, and given our rediculous FPTP voting system, creates this skewed interpretation.
The function of the federal government is to encourage (not discourage) an internal diaspora which (because it serves the purposes of the two good ol' boys parties) hasn't happened.
You want to see a more even distribution of resources throughout this country, then support proportional representation, and do not support the two redneck parties.
You're kidding, right? Proportional representation would just mean that *all* MPs would come from Toronto. It would make regional inequities worse, not better!
How absurd! But then, we have to take into account the source......
Alberta is not an independent nation. The resources belong to all Canadians. It was/is the C.R.A.P. marriage that defacto declared (in their effort to break up the country) that the resources of the provinces belong to the provinces.
Mmm, no. The Constitution Act, 1930 gave the natural resources to the provinces.
http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Cana ... _1930.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Re ... nsfer_Acts
While we're on the subject, Albertans last year gave $36 billion in taxes, but got only $17 Billion in transfers from the Feds. $5000 per person. By contrast, #2 on the list, Ontarians gave $2200 per person. And we still are underrepresented in Parliament.
$19 billion happens to be the total cost per year of the Canadian Armed Forces ($17 B), plus the 2 Billion needed to run the Federal Government. Our hard work keeps this country running. We could do very well on our own, but we like how things are now.
Now, can we stop with the divisive 'my province is better than your province' dick waving? Trudeau's NEP sucked, but it has little to do with what Williams is doing.
The Alberta example (no debt) can easily be applicable to T.R.O.C. That it wasn't (and isn't), is a condemnation of the governance of the two Red Neck Parties.
Danny Williams' fight with Harper is an attempt to do what Alberta has done, and this attitude shoudl be at the forefront of every Premier.
As I am (currently) from BC, I can hold G. Campbell up as a glaring example of the opposite of D. Williams, so perhaps it is appropos that the two provinces be bookends as well. BC has had a nearly 8-year run of unprecedented prosperity, yet the provincial debt has , and with everything from infrastructure, to healthcare, to education all the worse for the effort.
The Alberta example (no debt) can easily be applicable to T.R.O.C. That it wasn't (and isn't), is a condemnation of the governance of the two Red Neck Parties.
I've been trying to convince people that the Alberta 'model' hurts, but is do able for everyone.
And I can see how you appreciate what we've done - but how can you say it's not a condemnation - then call us "Red Necks"?
As I am (currently) from BC, I can hold G. Campbell up as a glaring example of the opposite of D. Williams, so perhaps it is appropos that the two provinces be bookends as well. BC has had a nearly 8-year run of unprecedented prosperity, yet the provincial debt has , and with everything from infrastructure, to healthcare, to education all the worse for the effort.
My Condolences.