SPP: Updating The Militarization And Annexation Of North America

Posted on Monday, March 16 at 20:46 by NAUWATCH

The title refers to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), also known as the North American Union - formerly launched at a March 23, 2005 Waco, Texas meeting attended by George Bush, Mexico's President Vincente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. It's for a tri-national agreement, below the radar, for greater economic, political, and security integration with secret business and government working groups devising binding policies with no public knowledge or legislative debate.

In short, it's a military-backed corporate coup d'etat against the sovereignty of three nations, their populations and legislative bodies. It's a dagger through the heart of democratic freedom in all three, yet the public is largely unaware of what's happening.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12696

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:46 pm
    I don't have all the details yet, but just walking in, the Mrs tells me that a group of 80 workers have occupied and welded shut the doors of their auto parts plant, saying that they are collectively owed in excess of $2.0 million in severence pay, this plant in Ontario just having closed down, and they say that this is only the start if they don't get their money.

    While it's still too early to speak of a trend here, of course, on the heels of the EI demonstration in Oshawa earlier this week, it is beginning to look like workers may finally beginning a "fight back".

    I place a great deal of stock in these types of militant actions because first, it takes a great deal of individual and collective courage and determination to stand up to and defy the politico-economic system, particularly in this kind of way, where workers outright seize control of instruments of the economy, and it can, in the right socio-economic circumstances be extremely contagious. And often it gets done in defiance of the workers' own co-opted and "tame" union leadership, which is what is going to have to be done in likely not a few class struggle instances, if workers are to prevent the offshore shipment of key elements of the national economy, and the jobs that are part of them. (Though this particular plant is likely CAW, my old union, which has historically, while playing "the game" according to the class system rules of capitalism, not been averse going outside those "management rights" rules of the game, when there is no other choice.)

    What is becoming clearer though, as the lower class rage grows here, is that "the reaction" is coming. Expect the unexpected.

    Just found these below:

    http://www.windsorstar.com/Business/Wor ... story.html

    As I thought, this is a CAW plant. Because it appears to be a spontaneous action on the part of the workers, though one never knows what goes on beneath the surface of these kinds of events, I will be extremely interested to see how the Union deals with this here. It will tell us a great deal about what can be expected from the formal trade union leadership, and whose side they will actually take, going forward into these times.
    Coyote

  2. by RickW
    Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:35 am
    Deal reached, coyoteman:
    http://news.sympatico.msn.cbc.ca/Canada ... &date=True

    It appears they got what they wanted, and right quick!



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news