Gaming The BC Election Co-Operatively: A Retrospective Look

Posted on Wednesday, May 13 at 22:13 by PatriotPete

- rather than compete and try to maximize results for each of their respective parties. Then, in that "suppose" deliberatively co-operative game (which did not happen) there is no doubt that the BC Liberals would not have won the following 10 seats in this May 09 election:
 

Burnaby Similkameen ( NDP 5460 votes/ GRN 1573 votes);
Burnaby- Lougheed (NDP 7712, GRN 1154);
Comox Valley (NDP 11593; GRN 2338);
Kamloops-North Thompson ( NDP 8792, GRN 1309);
Oak Bay-Gordon Head (NDP 8519, GRN 1766);
Parksville-Qualicum (NDP 7350, GRN 1923)
Penticton (NDP 6516, GRN 3252);
Vancouver-Fairview (NDP 6964; GRN 1678)
Vernon-Monashee (NDP 6836, GRN 3566)

AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, if they had taken my one suggestion to at least co-operate in Vancouver-Point Grey, Mr. Campbell would have been defeated.

Vancouver-Point Grey (NDP 6998; GRN 1581)

Game theory show creative co-operators will win handily over those who compete to pursue narrow self -interest.

Hubris, self-deception,adherence to competitive self-interested party politics, and failure to get the message of game theory - is the reason why, IMO, we are where we are - for the second election now. The folks within both the NDP and Greens who do not understand this key game theory message and who control those parties will not change their politically self-interested tune, and perhaps the only solution, is for large numbers of people who understand this concept to join each of those respective parties and "game" the next election co-operatively...while "powering down" those who just don't get it.

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options



Associated Topics

Canadian News


Comments

  1. by RickW
    Sat May 16, 2009 3:38 pm
    48% turnout is not an election................

    My proposal, considering that turnout numbers are ever-decreasing, would be that the number of seats occupied in legislatures and Parilament reflect the turnout. So in the case of the shameful BC turnout, 1/2 the seats would remain unoccupied. At least that would save those who DO vote about 1/2 the cost of MLA salaries............

  2. Wed May 20, 2009 12:17 am
    As an editorial in a local BC paper said , if the greens gave a rats ass about the environment instead of their egos, the best thing they could do for the environement today is fold, and join the NDP. If they had invested all the money and time they have squandered in campaigning as a party, in campaigning for porportional representation, it would be in effect by now, and they could run in the next election, and stand a chance of winning some seats. Their egos have done far more environmental dammage than they ever imagined.
    Brent



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news