Globalization Is Killing The Globe: Return To Local Economies

Posted on Tuesday, February 23 at 08:39 by NAUWATCH

By Thom Hartmann

Globalization is killing Europe, just as it's already wiped out much of the American middle class.

Spain and Greece are facing immediate crises that many other European nations see on the near horizon: aging boomer workers are retiring with healthy benefit packages, but the younger workers who are paying for those benefits aren't making anything close to the income (or, therefore, paying the taxes) that their parents did.

Globalists/corporatists/conservative "free market" and "flat earth" advocates say this is a great opportunity to cut benefits for the old folks (and for the young folks in the future), thus bringing the countries budgets back into balance, and this story is the main corporate media storyline.

But it overlooks the real issue (and the real solution): how globalization is killing these nations' economies and what can be done about it.

From the days of Adam Smith, classical economics pointed out that manufacturing and extraction are the only two ways to "create wealth."

"Wealth" is different from "income." Wealth is value, which endures at least for some time. Income is simply compensation for work. If you wash my car for $10 and I mow your lawn for $10, we have a GDP of $20 and it looks like we both have income and economic activity. But no wealth has been created, just income.

On the other hand, if I build your car, I'm creating something of value. And if you turn my lawn into a small farm that produces food we can all eat, you're creating something of value. Not only do we have an "economy" with a "GDP," we also have created wealth.

A stick on the ground has no commercial value, but if you add labor to it by carving it into an axe handle -- a thing of commercial value -- you have "created wealth." Similarly, metals in the ground have no commercial value, but when you add labor to them by extracting, refining, and forming them into products, you "create wealth." Even turning seeds and dirt and cows into hamburgers is a form of manufacturing and creates wealth.

This is the "Wealth of Nations" that titled Adam Smith's famous 1776 book.

On the other hand, when a trader at Goldman Sachs makes a "profit" trading stocks, bonds, or currencies, no wealth whatsoever is created. In fact, to the extent that that trader takes millions in commissions, pay, and bonuses, he's actually depleting the wealth of the nation (particularly to the extent that he moves his money offshore to save or invest, as many do).

To use the United States as an example, in the late 1940s and early 1950s manufacturing accounted for a high of 28 percent of our total gross domestic product (and much of the rest of the economy like agriculture that, in a classical sense is "manufacturing" wasn't even included in those numbers), and when Reagan came into office it was at a strong 20 percent. Today it's about ten percent of our GDP.

full article http://www.opednews.com/articles/Globalization-Is-Killing-T-by-Thom-Hartmann-100208-651.html

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:18 am
    Well, what a funny coincidence, I've been writing about this, including on several World Bank forums, for over 20 years.

    Ed Deak.

  2. by RickW
    Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:02 am
    A stick on the ground has no commercial value, but if you add labor to it by carving it into an axe handle -- a thing of commercial value -- you have "created wealth."


    A , nay - insurmountable, problem with this though is that those who have accumulated the major wealth in the world, have no idea what an "adze" is, never mind the ability to make one.

    And that simply won't do......

  3. Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:25 am
    Of course, they can go to China and have a million axe handles made for next to nothing, to be sold to people, whose axe handle making facilities have been stolen, at high prices.

    And this is what's really called "wealth creation"

    Ed Deak.

  4. Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:23 pm
    A spike in oil prices and shipping costs will make offshore produced goods non competitive with locally produced goods and quickly kill globalisation. It's all based on the naive assumption that shipping costs will remain low indefinitely.

  5. Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:38 pm
    I'm no commie or socialist but I fear there is some truth to this... It saddens me to see Canada slowly losing control of it's own sovereignty....

  6. by RickW
    Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:40 pm
    Except that oil companies are subsidized as it is. So why not just keep subsidizing them to disguise the humongous cost that shipping will be, if it is not all ready.
    http://stephenleahy.net/2009/05/07/mass ... e-podcast/



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news