Feds To Reduce Growth In Defence Spending

Posted on Friday, March 05 at 15:41 by NAUWATCH

The federal government will reduce its previously planned growth in spending on the Canadian Forces in 2012, after Canada's mission in Afghanistan comes to an end.

In a section of the Budget 2010 document titled "Restraining Growth in National Defence Spending," the finance department says the reduction is part of its effort to restrain overall growth in spending and to balance the budget in the medium term.

The measure will save the government over $2.5 billion over a period of five years.

Starting in 2012-2013, the Department of National Defence will see a reduction in previously-planned funding by $525 million.

Then, in 2013-2014, the reduction in spending will rise to $1 billion per year.

"Defence spending will continue to grow, but more slowly than previously planned," says the department of finance.

A chart shows the reduced rate of projected defence spending in Budget 2010, compared to pre-Budget 2010, will continue well past 2017-2018.

The department says by waiting to implement cuts on its pre-budget promises until 2012, the government ensures it won't "adversely affect military operations during the current Afghanistan mission." It says by holding off a few years, it also gives the Department of National Defence "sufficient time to adjust its long-term expenditure plans."

full article http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20100304/budget_2010_military_100304/20100304?hub=TopStoriesV2&s_name=




 
 
 

 

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RickW
    Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:57 am
    "Restraining Growth in National Defence Spending"

    According to Rick Mercer' Rant:
    http://www.tv-eh.com/2010/01/27/video-r ... ical-prop/
    the Cons were "restraining growth" well before their announcement. Only we didn't know about it (what else is new?)

    And of course, this only serves to KEEP our people in Afghanistan in an unnecessary state of danger.

  2. by avatar Scout
    Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:30 am

  3. Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:46 am
    Growth restraint has been going on for almost 30 years, with privatization of the money supply and corporate wish lists like NAFTA and WTO.

  4. by RickW
    Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:51 pm
    "Scout" said
    http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100224/mtl_defence_infrastructure_100224/20100224?hub=MontrealHome

    Either this will be quietly cancelled (put on permanent hold) as were the armored vehicles, or the facilities will be sold off, as part of the Con government's announced plans to rid itself of Crown Corporations. If the latter, the sale will come with the caveat that the money continue to be spent.....

  5. Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:42 pm
    What's the point in spending on so called "defence", when the government is setting up billboards around the borders with "CANADA FOR SALE" advertising on them ?

    By NAFTA and WTO rules the minute a foreign corporation sets foot into the country, even if their so called "investment" is created from the air right here, by Canadian banks, they're receiving "national status", which allows them full citizenship rights to buy politicians and governments.

    Immigrants are scanned, searched, examined and refused entry for the smallest offences on their records many years before, but corporations with mile long records of fines and offences all over the world are welcomed with open arms to continue their dirty work of cheating the public here.

    Ed Deak.

  6. by RickW
    Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:28 am
    Immigrants are scanned, searched, examined and refused entry for the smallest offences on their records many years before, but corporations with mile long records of fines and offences all over the world are welcomed with open arms to continue their dirty work of cheating the public here.
    That's because immigrants don't put money into Lib & Con party coffers.......

  7. Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:27 pm
    Rich immigrants do. Thats how our immigration system got all out of whack to begin with. Even the qiuntessential multi-culturalist, Pierre Trudeau, reduced immigration numbers when tough times called for it.

  8. by RickW
    Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:12 am
    And Mulroney put a price tag on immigration. Drop $100,000 on the table and you're in.....I have no idea what it is now.

    I wonder how this country woould ever have been developed if that was the case at the end of the 19th century?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news