The Steel City Takes A Hit

Posted on Sunday, April 04 at 07:28 by Dave Ruston

The decision by Labatt to move the Lakeport operation to a brewery in London, Ontario will put another 180 people out of work. Lakeport Brewery at one time was running a three shift operation, making beer and selling it at competitive prices ( a buck a beer ) all the while churning up a handsome profit. Labatt purchased Lakeport for roughly $200 million back in 2007. Workers at Lakeport were somewhat nervous of the deal but put faith in the quality of their product, thinking that perhaps their jobs would be safe from this type of predatory sociopathic capitalism.

Even though we supposedly have free trade with the USA, one of the reasons given for this move was not only consolidation of business operations, but also the fact that the London, Ontario Labatt brewery could no longer ship some of its product to American markets. But workers and union officials rightly feel that this move was just another way of a large multi-national shutting down the competition.

Of course, free trade was never about trade and improving the quality of life for Canadians and world citizens. It is about investment rights that corporations now enjoy, and corporate decision making without regard to the damage done to families and the environment. Federal, provincial, and municipal governments have all rolled over and turned a blind eye to this crime against humanity!

With the closure of John Deere Welland Works in Welland, Ontario, Edscha in Niagara falls, Robin Hood Flour Mill in Port Colborne, and the ongoing strike at Vale- Inco in Sudbury and Port Colborne, blue collar families in and around the Hamilton-Niagara area, a one time industrial powerhouse, are feeling the noose.

The time is long overdue to hold spineless governments accountable in their collaberation with these corporate criminals. Governments must go back to telling companies 'if you want to sell it here, you have to build it here' and also must reinstate rules and laws ensuring that corporate investment is beneficial to both the community it does business in, as well as benefit Canada. Governments that do not adhere to this commit treason.

I also know that I will be writing letters to as many political jellyfish that I can, putting pressure on them, reminding them of the crimes they are a party to. And I will also boycott Labatt products!

- Dave Ruston

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:37 pm
    You know, 'Labatt Canada' was bought by the Belgian company 'InBev' in 1995, right? They are now owned by "Anheuser-Busch InBev".

    Stella Artois = Budwiser = They. Aren't. Canadian.

    If you want to buy Canadian, buy from a local microbrewery.

  2. by RickW
    Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:07 pm
    "Dr Caleb" said
    If you want to buy Canadian, buy from a local microbrewery.

    They taste better anyway.

    Regarding the closure of branch plants, the sooner the better, I say! It's all a false economy anyway in the long run.

  3. Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:06 pm
    False economy, I agree, but, what do we replace good paying manufacturing jobs with? The government and their ilk claim we are in a 'knowledge economy' but the cost of post secondary education to acquire the 'accepted knowledge' is way out of reach for many not only due to skyrocketing tuition, but the loss of said good paying jobs! Corporations like McDonald's, Wal-Mart, Tim Horton's could certainly afford to pay better wages and benefits, but union leadership has become lazy, corrupt, and complacent due to their leadership getting six figure salaries themselves! I also believe that all unions, blue collar, white collar, public sector, private sector, should unite in a common front to fight the fascism! But of course, self interest comes into play again, as I see clearly that, say, the teacher's unions seem to feel they are above all the riff raff of blue collar struggle. I mean, don't these supposedly 'educated' teachers think that this whole thing can adversely affect them too? I even see a stratification in the CAW. The auto workers get looked after the best, while the 'rest of the dues payers' get left to twist in the wind. It wasn't like this 20 years ago. And again, I too, am not big on a branch plant economy. I believe the Canadian economy should definitely be Canadian owned. But any foreign investment into Canada should have clear benefits to Canadian families and the Canadian economy. In the mean time, I also say to lazy, corrupt union leaders: get off your asses and start fighting for what you're supposed to be fighting for!

  4. by RickW
    Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:34 pm
    what do we replace good paying manufacturing jobs with?
    We have fallen into the "trap" where we think the only way to make a living is to "get a good job". And furthermore, these jobs seem to have to be with Big Business. Well, come a little downturn, and we can easily see just how secure such a course of action can be.

    "Getting a job" is the new slavery. It ensures a ready pool of workers for that self-same Big Business.

  5. Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:25 pm
    Well then, tell me what the alternative is, When things cost money. It would be nice if we could all just be self employed and/or sell hemp socks on the corner and make a good living at it. But that's not the case. So what do you suggest? Not to mention, not everyone can just go to school, based on economic reasons, or just the plain fact that they're merely not academically inclined. I'd much rather be self-employed and make my own hours, be able to pay my bills, send my kid to school, and afford health care, dental, and all the rest. Again, a strong economy is a diverse economy. You need manufacturing. You need service. You need public sector and private sector jobs. You need self-employed people. But the system must be fair and lucrative enough for all. Even minimum wage work should provide a decent living. I mean, we've all gotta contribute to the betterment of the world somehow, but the trade-off must be worth it. So tell me, what's your alternative?

  6. by RickW
    Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:31 am
    You need manufacturing. You need service. You need public sector and private sector jobs. You need self-employed people.


    Granted you need all of these. But it's the structure that sucks. Why for instance, do workers meekly accept what industry has to offer? Why aren't there negotiations between the company and each potential worker? Unions have become particularly useless at this.

    To answer my own question (in part anyway), the education system (and society) teaches us to be "good employees" first, and to think second. Where is the self-assurance we should each be imbued with - such that we can approach a potential employer and tell him/her why he/she needs us? But no, we take wha tis offered. Then when the company "downsizes", we are often shocked that we are let go.

  7. Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:04 pm
    I agree with much of what you say, Rick, but let's be realistic. Individuals, especially in this day and age, have no power to negotiate anything with a potential employer. Now, it's all about the employer saying, "What can you do for me?" Then, you get hired, and it becomes'Here's what you're going to do for me!' Unions, when they weren't so corrupt and actually looked after their members, bargained for better wages, benefits, holidays, etc. and set the tone for even the non unionized shops. The combination of paying off union bosses with 6 figure salaries (and hidden remuneration for selling out their members), and trade agreements like NAFTA and WTO, have weakened the bargaining position of unions. But I still think that a giant, non-corrupt, non-fragmented union movement can stave off future regressions, and even reclaim some lost ground. As for schools and society brainwashing people into being good little worker bees, yes, I agree. Nobody really thinks anymore.

  8. by RickW
    Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:07 am
    Considering that the union movement is being strangled in every business, except the Public Service, maybe it's time to give the average worker some sort of leverage. The Tyee ( http://thetyee.ca/Life/2010/03/26/FutureRemade/ ) may have hit upon one way of the future, where large corporations will become dinosaurs anyway.

  9. Sat Apr 10, 2010 3:48 pm
    Ah, yes. Very much like the co-op type businesses propping up, where no special group is the board of directors, and there's no CEO. The WORKERS own the company, and everyone has a say in how the business is run. Profits aren't necessarily in the millions of dollars, but the livelihood for all involved is a fair and sustainable one. My kind of arrangement!

  10. by RickW
    Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:34 pm
    An example of how freedoms are diminshed in the name of "progress":
    http://harpers.org/archive/2010/04/0082881
    Toward a Second Haitian Revolution
    To Haitian peasants, wage work looked suspiciously like slavery—both monopolized the body of the laborer for someone else’s profit on someone else’s land. Yet export commodities and the money they generated required plantations. Without them, the government lacked the income to fund a military or build an infrastructure.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news