Omar Khadr, Basi, Virk, and Basi.
At fifteen years old Omar Khadr may have thrown a grenade. If he did, it may have killed a U.S. soldier/medic in Afghanistan. A death is important, even though Canadian-born Omar Khadr may have believed he was fighting for Afghanistan … even though he was a child soldier as defined by United Nations convention, and was badly wounded. A death matters. But it pales as we think ….
Dave Basi, Bob Virk, and Aneal Basi may have engaged in all the activities alleged in the original accusations against them. Two were charged with fraud and breach of trust, leaking confidential government information, bribery - one with money laundering - in the BC Rail Scandal. That matters in the conduct of public business which must be kept clean …. But the accusations against the men pale as we think ….
As we think of the nightmare called Guantanamo Prison, of the rape of international law (by two U.S. presidents) that it stands for, of the denial of U.S. law it broadcasts, of the desecration of centuries of struggle to establish the rule of law it demonstrates – Omar Khadr’s alleged crime almost disappears out of sight.
Nor may we forget for a second that Stephen Harper and his Canadian government rejected all claims arising from the rule of law, and turned their backs on Omar Khadr. A CanWest columnist – of all people – writes that the “handling of Khadr’s case more closely resembles justice in China or Iran than it does justice in Canada or any nation whose judicial procedures deserve our respect”. [dgardner@thecitizen.canwest.com]
Stop. That was yesterday. Since the Khadr detention at Guantanamo and the wrongful appointment of the Special Prosecutor in the BC Rail Scandal trials – nearly ten years – justice in North America is visibly a plaything of organized crime. That means a plaything of crime organized at the highest levels. It means we live in a culture of corruption that extends everywhere throughout the government and bureaucracy.
That is the central fact. Upon it hangs all the rest. The creators of Guantanamo Prison undertook that action as a piece … as a small piece of a large program of what must be called organized crime.
By the same token, the creators of the BC Rail Scandal and the secret/semi-secret, covert break-up of BC Hydro, sell-out of river energy, manufacture of huge transportation contracts – all under veils of secrecy, covert negotiations, and disinformation point to highest level organized crime. That activity extends through government, law firms at home and off shore, contracting networks, regulators, financiers … you name them – all feeding off B.C. public wealth invisibly forfeited into the indefinite future….
Until all of that is investigated, exposed, and remedied through criminal action, the BC Rail Scandal will not be put to rest.
None of that is said lightly.
We are talking about the collapse before our eyes of civil society in North America – with the courts and the major press and media consenting … and participating.
Omar Khadr was taken into custody only months after Gordon Campbell won power in B.C. and began, with the approval of his cabinet and caucus, the corrupt transfer of BC Rail to the CNR (among other betrayals of public trust). Omar Khadr was not permitted to speak to a lawyer until 2004, when he had been in custody for two years. Even that was a waste of time since he would live in a Concentration Camp and would face the biggest Kangaroo Court in the Western World in 2010.
Basi, Virk, and Basi were fingered before December 2003 when the legislature offices of Dave Basi and Bob Virk were (search warrant) raided by RCMP. The Force also raided other addresses, found incriminating evidence – with which nothing whatever was done. The three men were charged in December 2004. The investigation and charges have the appearance of strategic fakery. Especially since no major actors were investigated or charged and those others found with incriminating evidence in the original raids were ignored!
The Special Prosecutor appointed to work with the RCMP and to lay charges against the three men was appointed in violation of the legislation covering the appointment of Special Prosecutors … in flagrant violation of the legislation. Such was the violation connecting him to the cabinet intimately involved in the corrupt transfer of BC Rail that his every action in the years of pre-trial and in the months of trial must be deeply suspect. His conduct at the close of the trial served to deepen any suspicion present.
His improper appointment made the charges he framed improper, invalid, in fact…null and void. It made illegitimate the years of pre-trial hearings and the months of trial.
The court, from the beginning, was a Kangaroo Court. I wrote the judge presiding at the pre-trial hearings, asking what check the court runs on appointed Special Prosecutors.
She wouldn’t answer the question.
When I laid out the full report of the improper appointment of William Berardino QC as Special Prosecutor, the Chief Justice and Associate Chief Justice and the trial judge twice reported that they would do … nothing. The Gage Canadian Dictionary calls a Kangaroo Court “an unauthorized or irregular court in which the law is deliberately disregarded or misinterpreted”. Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie presided over a Kangaroo Court. Guantanamo Bay and B.C. Supreme Court.
The endings of the two “trials” in the same month, October 2010, were shockingly similar. They were both Public Relations disasters operated by governments pretending some kind of ‘rule of law’ exists … where it doesn’t.
Whatever the alleged “crimes” of Omar Khadr, Basi, Virk, and Basi – they were men played like puppets for years in the sleaziest, dirtiest political games employed to defeat the rule of law.
If Omar Khadr had been tried fairly, he’d have been out of Guantanamo in weeks … out, very likely, of jail altogether.
If Basi, Virk, and Basi had been tried fairly, they would (at the very least) have stood in court with top politicians and private corporate actors in the province. The trial - and the government of Gordon Campbell - would have been over in a few short months. Instead, to keep the Liberal government in power a fake set of pre-trial hearings was conducted through two elections.
The trial itself was conducted until the amnesiac fumbling, wallowing, and posturing of the first two witnesses, Gordon Campbell’s longtime Chief of Staff and one of cabinet’s top-level corporate appointees, was so revealing of the political sewer they inhabit that the Prosecution, the Court, the Attorney General, the RCMP, and the Cabinet became desperate.
They couldn’t let nearly thirty more Crown Witnesses reveal the stinking hole B.C. government has become. It’s ugly link with the RCMP. It’s fake Office of the Attorney General. Its compliant courtiers in the B.C. Supreme Court.
In the Omar Khadr and the BC Rail Scandal cases the trials ended with a “deal”, a plea bargain, an “agreement” between accused and (real) accusers. In both cases the “deal” stank to high heaven. In both cases governments desperate to hide their lawlessness (in fact, their criminal behaviour) patched and covered and postured in an attempt to make stinking injustice have the look of order and decency.
The treatment of Omar Khadr was so inhuman, so unjust, so sadistic that even law-denying Stephen Harper had to get in line with the U.S. government cover-up. His present position does him no credit. It simply shows that when his thug masters tell him to jump – he asks “how high?”
The Khadr trial end couldn’t be completely controlled by the U.S. government. And so the fake “jury” of military personnel in a travesty of a court recommended a 40 year sentence for Omar Khadr. Since the whole Guantanamo structure is demonic, sadistic, and inhuman, the jury was decoration … wonderful, fanciful, mean-minded, perverse decoration.
It was ignored. The Defence and the Accusers decided on an eight year term for Omar Khadr, most to be served (possibly) in Canada. Of course, the “Defence” really had little to do with the “deal”. For years Omar Khadr’s revolving Defence lawyers have been describing the process as sham, contrived, rotten….
What occurred, almost certainly, is the U.S. government wanted to dump Omar Khadr. “The fifteen year old terrorist-in-the-flesh” was becoming a sick, embarrassing joke. So Defence received its instructions. “Accept several guilty pleas, help dump Omar Khadr in Canada, make him see ‘reality’, or we’ll show him what lawless, sadistic, fascist courtroom savagery can deal out. Take your pick”.
By the same token “deal making”, “plea bargaining” was secondary in the Basi, Virk, and Basi BC Rail Scandal “trial”. The primary thing was to close down the trial, to slam the door on it. Fast. To stop the outpouring of evidence that the Liberal government of B.C. is, in fact, a major part of “organized crime”.
The plea bargaining had one goal only – to decorate the charges enough so they’d look reasonable to anyone not paying attention. And to assure the accused that if they refused a bargain, they would pay and pay and pay….
A little thing like the six million dollars in Defence lawyers’ charges were absorbed quickly by the Liberal government. “Standard” practice rules that convicted accused must pay. But they won’t. The taxpayer will.
The gravity of the allegation of crimes against the three men was watered down as much as the Special Prosecutor and Cabinet dared to water. If they could have freed the men completely, they would have done so. But the closing down of the trial had to be decorated.
Reporters close (?) to the Prosecution reported that Dave Basi insisted all charges against his younger cousin be dropped. And they were.
Discussion of Aneal Basi’s position is very difficult – as it must be in a corrupt trial. RCMP appear to have found evidence of wrong-doing against all three men. But since the Special Prosecutor is without credibility, having been wrongly appointed, we cannot accept the accusations against Aneal Basi – or any of the accusations against the three men put in place by an illegitimate Special Prosecutor.
That having been said, the Aneal Basi “removal” from all charges, all accusations whatever, may prove very, very much. From December 2004 until October 2010 the Crown (William Berardino QC) was certain of its charges against Aneal Basi – during six, long, much debated, pre-trial and trial years. And then, at the insistence of Dave Basi – reporters close (?) to the Prosecution wrote – Aneal Basi was washed of all charges against him.
The end of the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial was, in that way, a little different from the Omar Khadr trial ending.
The three men in B.C. had many, many more chips to play than Omar Khadr had. Bob Virk, for instance, sat on the scandalous “Evaluation Committee”, a cabinet-created sleaze operation to shoe-horn BC Rail into CNR. In that Committee secrets were received, secrets were spawned and shared, and ‘directions’ were given about how to ‘evaluate’.
Dave Basi was praised by Gordon Campbell for his behaviour pretending to be someone else when phoning a call-in show. The cabinet, one may guess, knew all Dave Basi was doing in his ‘media monitoring’ job, in alleged counter farmed-salmon protests … and more … reaching into the federal Liberal Party. (Remember cabinet members Geoff Plant, Gary Collins, Judith Reid, and Christie Clark all found it convenient to retire from politics at the 2005 election.)
If the trial continued – quite apart from the blood and gore Crown Witnesses close to the cabinet would leave on the floor in their days of cross-examination – there were the accused. Two of them were joined at the hip with the major actors in the corrupt (perhaps criminal) transfer of BC Rail to CNR.
Those accused had much to say – and they had to be stopped from saying it. The trial had to be closed down, the door slammed shut. Fast. And it was.
When Martyn Brown, Gordon Campbell’s long-time Chief of Staff, left the courtroom at each break during his cross-examination, he looked self-possessed though shaken. But when second Crown Witness Brian Kenning – who sat on the Evaluation Committee with Bob Virk – left the courtroom, he looked as if he might explode, his eyes angry and afire as he passed me going out.
Then he disappeared from B.C. to a birthday party in Toronto (it was reported)…and two jurors had medical problems…and Dave Basi fell sick.
Maybe planned events coincided with accidental ones. Maybe Mr. Kenning said: “I won’t step back into that court room. It’s a slaughterhouse. Do something”.
Whatever the case, when Brian Kenning was found to be in Toronto in the middle of giving testimony under cross-examination in Vancouver, Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie might well have ordered him back – immediately. Instead – as I recall her response – she was perfectly happy with Mr. Kenning’s actions, smiled … and accepted, almost as if she knew about his departure well in advance. (But of course she couldn’t have.)
Maybe Gordon Campbell, the Attorney General and other members of cabinet, and William Berardino QC, Special Prosecutor, were already at work to kill the trial. That is highly likely.
At the close of the trial, in scrum, William Berardino announced, without modification, that the plea bargain decision to have government pay all costs was his alone. That little piece of theatre was blown off the stage within hours, and the fooling with truth passed to the Attorney General who stated the ridiculous, that the decisions were made by Deputy Ministers (implying they weren’t at least approved by full cabinet before being announced).
No more need be said about that.
Except that the twenty million dollar farce involving the cabinet, the RCMP, the top judges of the B.C. Supreme Court, the Canadian Judicial Council, the Stephen Owen Special Prosecutor Review, the ever-subservient and fawning Mainstream Press and Media, and the wrongfully appointed Special Prosecutor says everything at a glance.
The trial was not stopped because the Special Prosecutor was wrongly appointed, in violation of the legislation governing the appointment of Special Prosecutors. No one in authority would deal with that undeniable truth – in fact all supported his illegitimate role in the case, when approached - by kinds of silence or obfuscation or statements of inaction.
The trial was stopped to protect organized crime operated from the highest levels of government in B.C. Just as the trial at Guantanamo Bay was also stopped to protect U.S. organized crime.
The B.C. Supreme Court is now, quite simply, a place where injustice rules and expensive games are played with taxpayers’ money to shield organized crime.
China and Iran should send observers. There is much they can learn from watching the operation of the British Columbia Supreme Court.

My question is, since the courts are political...what are we to do, since voting only upholds the present dirty political and justice system?
If the proverbial pot isn't stirred now and then, things become entrenched, and a certain rigor sets in. Expecting the present system to be self-correcting is the ultimate in naivet?, as the over-riding purpose of any institution is, first and foremost, to perpetuate itself.
When our, then PC MP, Lorne Greenaway resigned in 88, there was a race among the faithful for his replacement, with a well known person in clear lead. At least, that was what the public thought.
I met a local PC bigwig about a couple of weeks before the convention and mentioned that it looked like R. who claimed special friendship with Mulroney, was going to win? He laughed and said; "No bloody way ! That asshole is a loose cannon, Brian doesn't want him. It has been arranged a long time ago that XZ is going to get the nomination"
I couldn't understand how they could do it in a supposedly democratic community and system ?
We were in town on the day of the convention and happened to be passing by the hotel where the convention was held, just as the crowd was coming out. We saw it right then that the "mobile voting force", who attended and took over every convention of every party, has been hired and ordered to do the work.
The winning candidate was a local sawmill exec and all the mills gave the afternoon off so that the mobile voters could get to vote.
The losing, "sure to win", candidate went on a binge and wasn't sober for an alleged 3 weeks.
There are billions of people around the world who'd give anything to have some say in their futures by having the right to vote.
I have a strong suspicion that those who are urging people not to vote are either paid off, or ideologically warped agents for dictatorship.
Ed Deak.
The day after I vote, when I use to , these elected sheep of the corporate community and unionist , do as they want. Voting only maintains this corrupt system and if we are ever to get change, this system MUST fall. As it is right now it all about money and power , not good governance.
Political parties have been taking turn, using the taxation system to extort money out of our pockets. They have been starving the public infrastructure and instead using those tasxes collected to finance the business bums here in Canada and half of those business are American owned any way.
So why should I be so crazy as to keep voting when all they are doing is exploiting my vote . Being an idiot and a slave to these political party's is not in my mandate.
People who think outside the party box are not easly led by the nose...we think for ourselves, whereas you on the other hand cannot. I hope this you do not take this to be nasty.
If you want to maintain democracy, what is you suggestion for an alternative ?
As long as the present ideological system gives the right to the banks and corporations to "create" unlimited amounts of imaginary money to be used as weapons of colonization and enslavement, they can blackmail any government, regardless of ideology, to become their pimps, follow their demands, or else they ruin the economy and people's lives.
Now, what is your solution, when this BS is being taught in our universities as wealth creating economics?
How do we break the chains of monetary enslavement ?
Do you think voting for individuals, who may be closet pimps, could solve this problem?
Ed Deak. =
Now that you understand that all of this is taking place under (ALL) of these political parties, we must do our best to correct it.
My first suggestion is to not support it, by not voting and they will have little choice but to open up discussion to reform . There are many who want the P.R. , there are many who want to do away with the party system or at least remove the power they have, there are people who want Independent Consensus Constituency representation. But onr e thing for sure , they are sick and tired of political parties setting an agenda that benefits only the party and its sheep.
monetary enslavement is in place because of the legislation these political parties who are controlled by the corporation who benefit from this enslavement. Change the power structure from the party to the people for a start. But one thing for sure voting and supporting these political parties has NOT been the answer.
Well I would think that if new rulers were in place and those independent ( individuals ) you feel might be pimps ... that the constituency they run in would have a recall if they step over the line. But I hope you are not saying that we stick with the bunch of whores we have now and keep taking it up the back side , while they continue lie and steal from us ?
Ed: People are slowly paying more attention to the damage these political parties are doing to us and pretty soon they will get a big shock. I would say the within the next 2 0r 3 years we are going to see the citizens in the USA take to the streets big time and those liar politicians better have a good whole to climb into. The jigg is up..when the US dollar hits the bottom and when 2.4 million more foreclosures take place in 2011, we are going to see the people rise up.
Having lived under every known form of ideology in 4 countries, I don't like parties any more than you do, but there's no other way to form governments and some kind of order, because individuals would be bought up, or knocked down one by one by the predators, and who would form governments and ministerial posts? Who would appoint them ?
Ed Deak.
My first suggestion is to not support it, by not voting and they will have little choice but to open up discussion to reform
No. If only one person in the entire country decided to vote, the would justify keeping the present system to both the Liberal and Conservative parties.
And that can be seen by the simple observation that neither of these parties is interested in the declining voter turnout in federal elections.
Then they announced that 94% of the voters voted for the Communist Party, clearly the choice of the people.
Ed Deak.
As far a drawing the communist aspect into the debate , that is not what we are talking about, we are talking about limiting the power these political parties hold over our country...political parties have been proven to be nothing less than vehicles used to hijack what should be the "peoples" governing system.
As we have all watched for years , these political parties use the taxation system to enslave us , by way of legislation they approve financial legislation to collect public infrastructure and then divert many of those dollars over to finance private venture projects. Or they construct public projects and then turn those projects over to their political friends. We are being slowly forced into poverty one penny at a time. Parties are managed by lawyers and lawyers help them write legislation from which arguments arise and we all know lawyers do very well on the backs of taxpayers. Then we have corporation lawyers as lobbyest and we all know that corporation all do very well by the governing party, don't we?
There is not much difference right now between the way a communist government functions...in the communist system , the state finances the project and keeps the profits. Here in Canada / North America , the state has been financing private projects with state funds and the business community keep the profits , you might call that form of governing communists capitalisum, while we carry the debt. Annd at the sametime we are watching our public infrastructure fall apart.
All I am suggesting is we best be looking for a change in how government manages our coffers and until we limit the power these corrupt political parties wheel ...we will continue to see the same old BS.
I do not ahear to Communism , but what we have in many communist countries today is not Communism, we have countries led by tyrants ruler who exercises power in a harsh, cruel manner backed by the military...they fly the communist flag, but rule by fear. And today in North Ameria we are being governed by Fear.