Part II: Insurrection And Military Intervention: The US NATO Attempted Coup D'Et

Posted on Friday, March 11 at 09:33 by NAUWATCH

by Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Part II

Part I  Insurrection and Military Intervention: The US NATO Attempted Coup d'Etat in Libya?

The geopolitical and economic implications of a US-NATO led military intervention directed against Libya are far-reaching.

Libya is among the World's largest oil economies with approximately 3.5% of global oil reserves, more than twice those of the US.

"Operation Libya" is part of  the broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia which consists in gaining control and corporate ownership over more than sixty percent of the world's reserves of oil and natural gas, including oil and gas pipeline routes.

"Muslim countries including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Nigeria, Algeria, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, possess between 66.2 and 75.9 percent of total oil reserves, depending on the source and methodology of the estimate." (See Michel Chossudovsky, The "Demonization" of Muslims and the Battle for Oil, Global Research, January 4, 2007) .

With 46.5 billion barrels of proven reserves, (10 times those of Egypt), Libya is the largest oil economy in the African continent followed by Nigeria and Algeria (Oil and Gas Journal). In contrast, US proven oil reserves are of the order of 20.6 billion barrels (December 2008) according to the Energy Information Administration.  U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Reserves)

Note

The most recent estimates place Libya's oil reserves at 60 billion barrels. Its gas reserves at 1,500 billion m3. Its production has been between 1.3 and 1.7 million barrels a day, well below its productive capacity. Its longer term objective is three million b/d and a gas production of 2,600 million cubic feet a day, according to figures of the National Oil Corporation (NOC). 

The (alternative) BP Statistical Energy Survey (2008) places Libya's proven oil reserves at 41.464 billion barrels at the end of 2007 which represents 3.34 % of the world's proven reserves. (Mbendi 
Oil and Gas in Libya - Overview).

Full article  http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23605

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RickW
    Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:47 pm
    "Operation Libya" is part of the broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia which consists in gaining control and corporate ownership over more than sixty percent of the world's reserves of oil and natural gas, including oil and gas pipeline routes


    I can well imagine there is a scenario in some computer somewhere that deals with "unrest" in any major oil-producing region. The question might well be: is the computer in the US -- or in China?

  2. by avatar andyt
    Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:50 pm
    Now that the rebels are in retreat, and NATO is sitting on it's hands, are we going to read opinions from the same people that it's a dirty NATO plot to allow Gaddaffy to regain control so they can get back to business as usual?

  3. by RickW
    Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:11 pm
    It's quite possibly a repeat of the empty promises made to the Kurds during the first so-called Gulf War, and what Hussein did to them for backing the "coalition".
    http://middleeast.about.com/od/thisdayi ... alabja.htm
    And yes, it's business-as-usual.

  4. by avatar andyt
    Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:28 pm
    "RickW" said


    And yes, it's business-as-usual.


    Well, which is it, that's business as usual? A NATO plot to depose Gaddaffy or a NATO plot to let Gaddaffy win and do business with him?

  5. by RickW
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:40 am
    Don't much care, as long as the oil is handy. But so far, NATO/US would tend to back Ghadfly, because he's been doing business with the west, and the "rebels" are an unknown quantity. And "we all know" that the US tends to back despots over democracies.

    You mean you can't see this for yourself??!!

  6. by avatar andyt
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:43 am
    Well the gist of this topic is the exact opposite, that NATO is backing the rebels becuase they want to get Gadaffy out of the way and get their hands on the oil. Seems they can't win no matter what they do.

  7. by RickW
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:27 am
    Strange. About the only oil they don't have from Ghadfly is the stuff going to China. Maybe a little realpolitik at play?

  8. Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:33 am
    You can't help tripping over your own arguements on this one. The west has done nothing for either side. The original arguement that you had was that this rebellion was started by western agents and wasn't even part of the Arab uprisings. Now that the rebels are failing, you are blaming the west for a repeat of the Kurds or Shiites in Iraq.

    Sometimes things happen in the world that have nothing to do with any American or Western influence. This would be one of them.

  9. by RickW
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:38 pm
    The west has done nothing for either side.

    This begs a few questions, namely:
    - how did the "protesters" in Libya get hold of the firepower they do have;
    - why the only oil-rich country in N. Africa was also the only place where the
    "protest" flared into a full-fledged rebellion;
    - do the oil exports Ghadafiduck depends on for his existence still find their way to markets, or have they come to a grinding halt;

    I am sure there re more, but these will do for now, to decide whether or not the west has done nothing.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:24 pm
    "RickW" said
    The west has done nothing for either side.

    This begs a few questions, namely:
    - how did the "protesters" in Libya get hold of the firepower they do have;
    - why the only oil-rich country in N. Africa was also the only place where the
    "protest" flared into a full-fledged rebellion;
    - do the oil exports Ghadafiduck depends on for his existence still find their way to markets, or have they come to a grinding halt;

    I am sure there re more, but these will do for now, to decide whether or not the west has done nothing.


    Many soldiers deserted and joined the rebels. Once they had taken over a city, they would have access to all the govt weaponry there. Note pics of rebels using the AA that was installed in the city. And if other middle east countries are anything to go by, everybody and his dog has a gun anyway.

    This is the only country where the military put up a full scale assault on the citienzry instead of bargaining. And Libya is riven by tribal conflicts, more so than
    Egypt.

    The rebels themselves were making sure that oilshipments were getting out of their area, which is where the oil is. And they were apparently collecting the money for it to use for arms etc.

    You sound like one of those "the west can do no right" types. The west does many idiotic or greeding things, but in this case you are damning them if they do and if they don't. I'm not sure what would satisfy you here?

  11. by RickW
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:24 pm
    What would "satisfy" me here is if the west for, for once, stand up for the democratic ideals it keeps saying it upholds and wishes for every region of the world. But, it is only a paper tiger in this regard. The west acts more like Jabba the Hutt than it does Obi-Wan Kenobi.

  12. by avatar andyt
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:25 pm
    "RickW" said
    What would "satisfy" me here is if the west for, for once, stand up for the democratic ideals it keeps saying it upholds and wishes for every region of the world. But, it is only a paper tiger in this regard. The west acts more like Jabba the Hutt than it does Obi-Wan Kenobi.


    So you're for NATO getting involved militarily in Libya? I thought you were against that?

  13. Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:02 pm
    He's for whatever we appear to not be doing right now. That is subject to change if we do it however.

  14. by RickW
    Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:37 pm
    "andyt" said


    And yes, it's business-as-usual.


    Well, which is it, that's business as usual? A NATO plot to depose Gaddaffy or a NATO plot to let Gaddaffy win and do business with him?

    NATO?
    http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/wo ... ervention/



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news