By Dana Gabriel
Canada and the U.S recently issued a joint threat and risk assessment as part of ongoing efforts to further enhance security on the northern border. This initiative supports a declaration by the leaders which will work towards facilitating the movement of travel and trade between the two countries. The Canadian government has announced that they are seeking online public consultation on the security perimeter arrangement. Meanwhile, the country has been thrust into an election with the defeat of the ruling Conservative party in a non-confidence vote. During the campaign, sovereignty concerns associated with the proposed trade and security deal could become a hot-button issue.
On March 10 of this year, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Canada's Public Safety Minister Vic Toews unveiled a Joint Border Threat and Risk Assessment. The report focuses on national security, criminal enterprises, migration, agriculture and health threats to the border. A press release described how the joint initiative, “is a part of a shared vision for border security that Secretary Napolitano and Minister Toews outlined during meetings held throughout 2010, and reflects their mutual commitment to working together to safeguard both nations' vital assets, networks, infrastructure and citizens.” The assessment addresses common threats to the border such as, “terrorism and transnational crime articulated by President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper in February. Their historic declaration – ‘Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness’ – sets forth how the United States and Canada will manage our shared homeland and economic security."
The Conservative government has maintained that a security perimeter with the U.S. will not impact on sovereignty, but a poll issued last month suggested that Canadians remain concerned. The Vancouver Sun reported that a survey conducted by Ipsos Reid found that 68% believe Canada, “will compromise too much power over decisions about immigration, privacy and security to get a perimeter security agreement.” The poll also found that 51% of Canadians don't, “trust Stephen Harper to negotiate a deal that improves border access but doesn't give up powers that are important to Canada maintaining its own independence.” With respect to transparency, "An overwhelming 91% of Canadians say the negotiations should take place in public so that they can see what is on the table." There is little doubt that the border deal will mean some sort of tradeoff between sovereignty and security.
full article http://beyourownleader.blogspot.com/2011/03/canada-us-deep-integration-agenda_28.html
Stumble It!
US Drones Patrol Western Canadian Border
If deep integration is the issue, then are these drones just a precursor to unmanned surveillance/interdiction flights throughout the US, Canada, Mexico?
http://www.infowars.com/canadian-offici ... agreement/
Sounds like Harper's secret agenda. Expect IRA type confrontations, if we see US Coastguard vessels in Canadian waters.
Sounds like Harper's secret agenda. Expect IRA type confrontations, if we see US Coastguard vessels in Canadian waters."
Haven't posted on hear for quite a few years, but I always come daily to read posts and this one caught my eye. If this is true, then this coastguard member or members should contact the media. If they can get a copy of the documentation they should give it to the media. I agree from your inference, no canadian will allow the U.S. coast guard to operate in Canadian waters to take over our own Canadian Coast Guard. Especially to be boarded by the U.S. Coast Guard. This would be the end of our sovereignty. WTF??