Lest We Forget - The New Can-US Regulatory Co-Operation Council

Posted on Thursday, May 12 at 10:29 by Janet M Eaton


Lest we Forget - The new Can-US Regulatory Co-operation Council and
Perimeter Security Accord is the next generation of NACC and the SPP.
By Janet M Eaton, Sierra Club Canada,  Trade and Environment
Campaigner,  May 10th, 2011

A  Vancouver Sun May 9th article entitled "Is 'harmonizing' code for
cutting standards?"  cites the Canadian government, industry
representatives and consumer group reaction to a  new Canada-US Regulatory
Cooperation Council. [1] 

It should be noted that this new Regulatory Cooperation Council Is
part of an initiative formally entitled "Beyond the Border: A Shared
Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness" "A Declaration by the
President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of
Canada" sometimes called the  Perimeter Security accord.   Less formally
this initiative has been referred to as the Son of SPP, and Fortress North
America.  [2] 

Those who followed the fate of 'deep integration' with the US under
the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America [SPP] will
recall a parallel initiative under that agreement i.e - the North
American Competitiveness Council [NACC] which was charged with, among
other things: "Regulatory/Standards issues - Harmonization and Sharing of
Best Practices"   [3] 

NACC prepared a lengthy report for the Leaders Summit in Montebello,
Quebec in August 2007, " Building a Secure and Competitive North America".
In the area of standards and regulatory cooperation, the report supported
the intention of governments to work toward a framework for trilateral
regulatory cooperation in 2007, which it saw as an essential tool for
ensuring the compatibility of new regulations while reducing unnecessary
differences in existing rules and standards.  4]

It should also be remembered that the SPP was discredited by broad
civil society opposition as well as online and political reaction
which peaked around the Third leader´s Summit held in Montebello,
Quebec in August 2007.  The lack of transparency,  its anti-
democratic nature  and  other factors led to its demise in 2009.  [5]

And yet the new Perimeter Security accord and Regulatory Cooperative
Council have been introduced in the same  anti- democratic manner. Paul
Dewar, NDP foreign affairs critic in the last Parliament confirmed that
Parliamentarians were kept in the dark. And the Toronto Star reporting on
a leaked copy of the strategy, said the government purposely kept
negotiations on the border deal secret while it planned ways to swing
public opinion in favour of the deal. [6] 

  According to the Vancouver Sun article referred to above the
Regulatory Cooperation Council received a big boost this week when
President Barack Obama talked up the initiative during his
congratulatory phone call to Prime Minister Stephen Harper after
Harper's election victory. " 

As to its purpose, the Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade said the intention of the newly launched
initiative, which is expected to take two years, is to eliminate
"unnecessary burdens" on cross-border trade by coordinating and
simplifying regulations where possible. Not unlike the purpose of the NACC
regulatory process under the SPP, which according to Thomas D'Aquino, then
head of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives,  was to eliminate the
"tyranny  of small differences".  [7] 

D'Aquino  referred to the new Regulatory Cooperation Council in a
recent address to the  Canadian Defence Associations and CDA
Institute March 2011 Conference on Defence and Security: " I was
especially pleased to see a commitment from the Prime Minister and
the President to the creation of a Regulatory Cooperation Council
(RCC) composed of senior regulatory, trade and foreign affairs
officials from both governments. The Council´s mandate to eliminate
unnecessary burdens on cross-border trade, reduce costs, faster cross
border investment, and promote certainty by co-ordinating, simplifying and
ensuring the compatibility of regulations is worthy of strong support."

Meanwhile the Ottawa-based Centre for Science in the Public Interest, says
talk of harmonization by multinational companies is just code for
something nefarious. [9] 





[2] http://creekside1.blogspot.com/2010/12/son-of-spp-sequel.html
fortress-na -leaked-docs-reveal-border-security-deal 

[3] http://www.americas-society.org/coa/NACC/NACC5.pdf 

[4] http://www.as-coa.org/files/PDF/pub_563_364.pdf 

[5] http://greenpages.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/spp-security-pact-

[6] http://ca.news.yahoo.com/federal-documents-contradict-harpers-






Contributed By

Article Rating

 (0 votes) 



    You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.

    Latest Editorials

    more articles »

    Your Voice

    To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

    canadian bloggers | canadian news