The End OF “The Rule Of Law” In Canada.

Posted on Sunday, September 18 at 20:31 by Robin Mathews

The End Of “The Rule of Law” in Canada. 

 

Honours received, the title “Honourable”, and political titles are now becoming criminal rankings in Canada.  Media are now “accessories” to crime.  Police are now often mafia-style “enforcers”.  Opposition parties cooperate in crimes having taken place and presently taking place.

 

Where do we look to see the picture before us?

 

Maybe we should begin with the sick biography of B.C. Associate Chief Justice, the Honourable Anne Mackenzie in the (July) B.C. Bar Association journal, The Advocate. (Asked for a professional biography of her in 2009 when MacKenzie ‘replaced’ Justice Elizabeth Bennett on the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial, the B.C. Supreme Court refused to provide one.)  The Advocate (July 2011) presents a highly selective, high-school gossip, “fashion” biography. Such is the state of the B.C. Supreme Court.

 

Or maybe we should begin with the endless Canadian media celebration of convicted criminal Lord [Conrad] Black of Cross Harbour – a celebration that persistently excuses Black and challenges justice effectively administered (outside Canada). Black is a holder of the Order of Canada.  He surely deserves to be on this year’s Order of British Columbia list with ‘possible’* criminal Gordon Campbell and his close friends the Honourable David Emerson and Ken Dobell.

 

Or maybe we should begin with the story of activities undertaken by ‘possible’*criminal the Right Honourable Stephen Harper in his role as prime minister.

 

Or maybe we should begin with the obscene appointment by ‘possible’* criminal, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, of ‘possible’* criminal, former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell to the post of Canadian High Commissioner in London.

 

Or maybe we should begin with the naming of ‘possible’* criminal Gordon Campbell to the Order of British Columbia – named by a roster of mostly sychophants and lackies … among them the Chief Justice of British Columbia, the Honourable Lance Finch, who has failed to legitimate the breach of protocol used to effect the stunningly stupid choice.

 

Put it another way.

 

‘Possible’* criminal the Right Honourable Stephen Harper appointed as Associate Chief Justice the Honourable Anne Mackenzie.  She (after being fully informed) fronted for illegitimately appointed Special Prosecutor William Berardino in the Basi, Virk, and Basi case.

 

On looking at the B.C. appointments of Special Prosecutors since the access to power of Gordon Campbell (2001 and on), something disturbing appears.  The Gordon Campbell group may have used (and the Christie Clark government may still use) the process to appoint sophisticated lackeys chosen especially to pollute the administration of justice.  Long-time B.C. Supreme Court judge Wally Oppal – as Attorney General of B.C. – for instance, actively violated the structure of the Special Prosecutor legislation.  So flagrantly did he do so that when the case against the Bountiful (alleged) bigamists went to court, the judge stopped the trial, and, in effect, threw it out.

 

Oppal was confirmed – in a case taken against the prosecution by the accused - to have acted improperly. 

 

As a result, Wally Oppal has been appointed by the Campbell/Clark government to what will be a long-running and  highly lucrative position – reviewing the treatment of missing, murdered, Vancouver downtown Eastside women. 

 

Those in the magic circle in British Columbia can do no wrong, even when they are publicly exposed for improper behaviour.  But major efforts are made to cover up wrong doing in the magic circle … by the circle itself, by the media, by the police, by the courts ….

 

The refusal by Associate Justice Anne MacKenzie (and Chief Justice Bauman) to remedy the illegitimate appointment of William Berardino as Special Prosecutor assured an illegitimate and fraudulent criminal trial of Dave Basi, Bobby Virk, and Aneal Basi (in the BC Rail Scandal).  Berardino and Mackenzie, in effect, I allege, covered for Gordon Campbell, the Honourable Christie Clark, and, almost certainly, guilty corporate others.

 

B.C. RCMP top officer Gary Bass refused (October 2009) a formal request to investigate Gordon Campbell and all others involved in the corrupt transfer of BC Rail to CNR. RCMP Commissioner William Elliott (now shifted to a sinecure at the U.N. – to get him out of sight and mind (?)) refused any communication.

 

Media and police, I allege, protected Mackenzie, Berardino, Campbell, Clark … and many others …  from 2001 to 2010.

 

A complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council about the Honourable Anne Mackenzie’s “conduct” was rejected as not being about “conduct”. Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, the Honourable Neil Wittmann had his secretary assert that he (the Honourable Neil Wittman) had no opinion about the illegitimate appointment of William Berardino as Special Prosecutor.

 

Look at the people discussed above. Top politicians in B.C. and Canada.  Top police officers in B.C. and Canada.  Top officers of the highest courts in B.C. and Canada.  Top lawyers in the B.C. Bar Association and elsewhere. Almost all media in B.C. and Canada.

 

I suggest they represent a closed, corrupt, cooperating, lawless shop: destroyers of the Rule of Law in Canada.

 

“Possible* criminal”: Definition.

 

The term is used because of the failure of The Rule of Law.  Investigation of public officers and the powerful by police forces is often fraudulent and/or inadequate. Court action is often fraudulent and/or inadequate. Recourse to remedy of any kind is mostly cut off by the “closed, corrupt, cooperating, lawless shop”. Media almost always cooperate fully with criminal action, – being part of the “closed, corrupt, cooperating, lawless shop”.

 

People believed by many serious, prudent, reasonable Canadians to have violated law and/or trust - to have, in fact, engaged in criminal activity - go almost completely unchallenged.  That makes it necessary to refer to ‘possible’* criminal X’.

 

‘Possible’* criminal, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper.  (1) In the 2006 federal election, the Party headed by Stephen Harper engaged in what is called the “in and out scandal”.  It was, I believe, a concerted activity to engage in criminal breach of trust.  In effect, a highly effective misspending of electoral funds was engaged in by more than 65 Conservative candidates, only a few others refusing to participate in the dishonest activity. 

 

The “in and out scandal” may have been instrumental in bringing the Conservative Party to illegitimate majority power in Canada.

 

Properly investigated, properly pursued in the courts, Stephen Harper might well be named criminally responsible in the scandal. The destruction of the Rule of Law in Canada, however, has made impossible, I believe, the necessary procedures to reach a full and fair conclusion.

 

(2) In the G8/G20 meetings in June 2010 ‘possible’* criminal the Right Honourable Stephen Harper oversaw as prime minister the actions of Infrastructure minister John Baird and Industry minister Tony Clement allegedly misusing $50,000,000.00 of Customs funds for pork-barrelling and graft in the constituency of Tony Clement. 

 

Discussion of the activity has been barren and futile.  Properly investigated, properly pursued in the courts, Stephen Harper, Tony Clement, and John Baird might well, I believe, be named criminally responsible in the scandal.  The destruction of the Rule of law in Canada has made impossible, however, I believe, the necessary procedures to reach a full and fair conclusion.

 

If those matters have substance, the appointment by ‘possible’* criminal the Right Honourable Stephen Harper of ‘possible’* criminal Gordon Campbell to the position of Canadian High Commissioner in London makes sense. 

 

The RCMP in B.C. refused to investigate Gordon Campbell’s role in the corrupt BC Rail Scandal. Campbell probably, I believe, engaged in criminal breach of trust in the destruction of BC Hydro and in the extraordinary “reconstruction” of BC Ferries.  Those are only most evident areas in which serious, criminal investigation has been denied - areas of so-called “privatization”, policy dear to the heart of Stephen Harper.  Other areas, involving infrastructure contracts, road-building, etc. are only less visible.

 

To many, many observant British Columbians, ‘possible’* criminal Gordon Campbell and his circle shriek for investigation. British Columbians can be sure that the Stephen Harper cabinet will not do anything to further such investigation. The destruction of the Rule of Law in Canada, actively assisted by Stephen Harper, has prevented what – in a normal democratic society – would by now have been fully and fairly undertaken.  The result would have been – many believe - that the whole complexion of B.C. political, business, and legal life would have been transformed.  Instead, the province is mired in the sewage of continuing corrupt practices.

 

They cannot go on – provincially or federally – without the country suffering major dislocation, civil unrest, and possible bankruptcies created by criminal misdirection of public funds.

 

Canadians must act – physically – to seize power from the criminals presently destroying the country.  Canadians might begin to get into practice on October 4, by attending the ceremony to present the Order of British Columbia to ‘possible’* criminal Gordon Campbell (whether he is there or not). Canadians should   prevent that ceremony from taking place. 

 

Such action must be done peacefully and within the constitutional structures of the country, of course – but it must be done. 

 

The Opposition parties? 

 

Just look at B.C.  When William Berardino was shown conclusively to have been appointed Special Prosecutor in the BC Rail Scandal by violation of the legislation, the NDP would do nothing.  Solicitor General critic Mike Farnsworth and Attorney General critic Leonard Krog cooperated with Stephen Owen (chosen out of the air by then Attorney General Michael de Jong) in what I insist was a fake review of the operation of the Special Prosecutor process.  Both Farnsworth and Krog approved of the whitewash Report.

 

Recognized NDP journalist Bill Tieleman publicly asserted that Willliam Berardino had been cleared of suspicion and that I was incorrect in asserting otherwise.  Tieleman’s statements are wholly false.

 

New leader of the NDP Adrian Dix has stated he does not believe a Public Inquiry into the BC Rail Scandal is desirable.  He should be demanding immediate criminal investigation, and he should be doing it every day.

 

Plainly, if meaningful action against real corruption in high places is going to happen in Canada, it is going to have to be organized and carried out by Canadians apart from political parties which - like the courts, police, and media – are, to all appearances, supporters of the present deep and widespread corruption in the country.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RickW
    Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:19 am
    Could this be the proverbial "one small step" in the rightings of wrongs? Or is it so small a move in the right direction as to be insignificant?
    http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1054001
    Rideau Hall confirmed that the honour handed to the once powerful media baron more than two decades ago is under review after he was ordered back to prison to serve out a sentence for mail fraud and obstruction of justice.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news