SAY NO TO THE SELL-OUT OF BC WATER TO PRIVATE ENERGY CORPORTIONS

Posted on Tuesday, January 30 at 09:29 by PatriotPete
The licensing of water for power production to private energy companies represents an extremely significant shift in public policy. While this 'shift' may result in more 'green energy' production, there are enormous environmental, fiscal and political implications that have received little to no examination or debate, either amongst indigenous peoples or the general public. Ask yourself these questions: Despite an increased demand for electrical energy the current BC government has passed laws which prevent BC Hydro from constructing any more power projects, saying instead that BC Hydro must buy all its future power needs for BC consumers from private energy corporations. Is this reasonable, is this fair, and is this in the best public interest? In Alberta residential consumers buy their electrical power from private energy companies, such as EnMax Corporation, at a considerably higher prices then what is available from BC Hydro? That scenario is soon coming to British Columbia. Has the government asked you if you want to buy your electricity directly from private energy corporations at whatever price the 'continental electrical energy' market assigns to that energy? Is that what you want for yourself, your business, your children & grandchildren? Is it just that the enormous wealth that comes from selling the energy from our rivers & creeks be captured primarily by private corporations when there have been so many closures of schools, hospitals and community care facilities for seniors? Is it just that the BC government allows private corporations to make such an incredible 'bundle of money' from our rivers and creeks while there is such a high degree of poverty and homelessness in British Columbia, when there is a huge need for more public low-cost housing? Why is it that the government has decided to seek minimal payment of rents, charges and royalties from these private energy corporations? What is the public interest reasoning behind such decisions? How much money is estimated to be lost to the public treasury by such decisions? Is it just that legislation allows these energy corporations to sell-out to bigger United States energy corporations, which implies that our water and energy could come completely under foreign control? Is this good for BC's long-term energy security? For our children, grandchildren's future? Is it just that the BC government has removed all legal barriers to the export of energy produced in B.C. which implies that there is nothing to stop these companies from directly exporting the power from our rivers/creeks to the United States so as to earn a higher revenue payable in U.S. dollars? Has the government properly investigated the environmental impact of these private power projects on hundreds or rivers/creeks in British Columbia or has it been a 'snow-job"? These projects will involve roads into undeveloped areas, dams, pipelines, construction camps, generating stations, and a network of power lines linking up BC Transmission Corporation's transmission lines. What is the individual and cumulative effect? Is the broader public interest better served by having our rivers/creeks and 'green' electrical energy production under public ownership and control, or is it better served by private energy corporations? In low -water flow years how much of our water in those projects will be 'reserved' for power production and how much has been set aside/ 'reserved' for other needs such as wildlife, recreation, etc. ? Can the water licences be amended or upgraded to give the corporations even more rights to water? Why has not the facts in the Summary and the implications for British Columbia been investigated and reported in our mainstream newspaper and television media? Is it just that there is such a monopoly ownership of the mainstream media? Is that concentration of media ownership good for democracy? Why the cover-up? Why has not the current BC government made public the information contained in the Summary and engaged in a "Conversation on Energy' with British Columbia before allowing this sell-out? Why the secrecy? Why has the Water Comptroller decided NOT to hold public hearings prior to granting hundreds of water licences for power production, as he is entitled to do under the Water Act? On what basis does the Water Comptroller decide or not decide to hold a public hearing? How many instances have there been where the Water Comptroller has turned down an application for a water licence for power production from a private energy corporation? Where is the transparency, where is the accountability? Are there terms and conditions attached to those water licences, if so, what are they? Is it just that many of BC's private energy corporations have made significant monetary contributions to the BC Liberal party, and that their 'organization' the "Independent Power Producers" enjoy an extremely close relationship with the Premier and some Cabinet ministers? In your mind does such dealings serve to increase your trust and confidence in the practice of democracy - or not? When the Squamish Regional District voted twice to deny a private corporation the permission to build a hydroelectric facility on the Ashlu River, the provincial government passed Bill 30, overturning the right of local governments to legislate over local power production projects. Presently, Ledcor, a private energy corporation is building a private hydroelectric generation facility on the Ashlu River. In your mind is this just or is this an abuse of power? Is this how a democracy should function? Finally, ask yourself this fundamental question, who pays and who benefits from this enormous shift in 'ownership and control' of public water and energy resources? Do you think that this 'shift' will create a more just, a more equal society or does it set the conditions for still more millionaires to benefit privately. Does this 'shift' create the kind of legacy you wish to leave your children and grandchildren? Think of what you can do personally. Think of what you can do to inform and organize your neighbours in your immediate neighbourhood. Contact me at editor@bcpolitics.ca...and I will do my best to help your organization at the local level, whether that means speaking, or whatever. Also, tune into co-op radio, "Discussion" radio program Wednesday night (January 31st) at 7:00pm, 102.7 FM on the dial. Feb 12th, I understand that some folks are organizing something to take place at noon at the BC Hydro building - be there. http://www.bcpolitics.ca/SummaryHydro1.htm http://www.bcpolitics.ca/SummaryHydro2.htm [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 31, 2007]

Note: http://www.bcpolitics.c... http://www.bcpolitics.c...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by Deacon
    Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:36 pm
    Remember what I said about the fight to save the Nechako River not being over?

    Now the battle has been joined and the field is now the entire province.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  2. Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:36 pm
    I have the greatest respect for Peter and agree with every word in this article.

    However, it is nothing new and, once again, it goes back to the forcefeeding of the neoclassical market economic theory to students and the public, especially through the corporate advertising agencies, in BC's case, the Fraser Institute.

    The FI published a book, about 20 years ago, edited by their then VP, or similar, Arnold Block, who was on CBC radio, plus the commercial stations, TV, and all the papers, propagandizing the sale of all Crown lands and waters, including all rivers, creeks, lakes and even the division of the oceans, to corporations as an "envrironmental protection" measure.

    Citing the falsified words of Adam Smith, of course. These jerks would be dead in the water if they couldn't misquoute Smith one way, or another.

    Now, let's look at the connection of Campbell's brother, Michael, to the Fraser Inst. and the influence of that outfit on the policies of the present BC government and, combined with the rest of these PR agencies, on federal policies.

    In short: Everything is moving as planned and in the groove, with democracy and people's rights sold down the drain.

    After all, we live in a market economy, where people are the first commodity on the auction block

    Ed Deak.

  3. Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:45 pm
    <a href="http://bctrialofbasi-virk.blogspot.com/">http://bctrialofbasi-virk.blogspot.com/</a><br />
    I urge the readership to read the ongoing information at the above site.<br />
    Dio<p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
    <br />
    it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
    <br />
    lex ferenda



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news