In very simplest terms, Canada actively helped create social chaos in Haiti so that it could be branded “unstable”. Canada helped overthrow the elected government of Jean Bertrand Aristide, and presently assists the murderous brutality in Haiti. Canadian government cannot be called ignorant of conditions there. Paul Martin, Pierre Pettigrew, and even former political toy-boy of Brian Mulroney, present premier of Quebec, Jean Charest, have visited the tiny, poverty stricken country since “the Ottawa initiative on Haiti.”
The fundamental story is that Haiti – after years of U.S.-backed Duvalier family despotism – moved towards justice in 1990 when Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a former priest, won the government against the U.S. backed candidate. Seven months later a CIA-backed coup overthrew Aristide and chaos entered, such terrible chaos that U.S. president Clinton had to restore Aristide in 1994.
The die, however, was cast. The U.S. was determined to destroy Aristide and his party Fanmi Lavalas when it won overwhelmingly throughout Haiti led by Rene Preval in 2000, prefiguring a presidential win for Aristide a few months later in November. The U.S. determination to destroy Aristide and Lavalas was motivated by the Lavalas education program, its slow movement to bring some equality to a population treated like animals by Haitian people in power, its willingness to support co-operatives and state run enterprises, and its desire for a truly informed and participating democratic population.
The U.S. went into full Cold War mode, suspending aid, infiltrating fake aid groups, and forcing other governments (Canada included) to do likewise.
Incredibly, on January 31 and February 1, 2003, Canada hosted “the Ottawa Initiative on Haiti.” It was the first of meetings to decide Haiti’s future, to which no Haitians were invited. At those meetings the first steps toward the coup d’etat to take over Haiti were worked out with full Canadian (French and U.S.) participation, the evidence of which is now kept in secret in Ottawa.
Most of the people placed in power after the overthrow were working with U.S./Canadian/French overthrow forces.
In the process of destabilization leading up to the coup Canada was front and centre. Engler and Fenton tell us many things. “Without exception, documents obtained from CIDA (the Canadian International Development Agency) reveal that organizations ideologically opposed to Lavalas were sole recipients of Canadian government funding.” (p.50)
“NCHR (National Coalition for Haitian Rights) received [from Canada] $100,000.00 in 2004 for the specific purpose of juridical, medical, psychological, and logistical assistance for victims of an alleged massacre at a town … called Scierie.” The massacre, it seems, never took place. (p. 54)
After the coup, Philippe Vixamar became deputy minister of justice. Vixamar “stated that he is a political appointee of the Latortue administration, but the Canadian International Development Agency assigned him the position and is his direct employer.” (p.57) He shared responsibility “for police operations and for all political prisoners in the country”. (pp.57-58) Police operation supports – however tacitly – continuing brutality, and political prisoners are violated daily. (Under the supervision of a Canadian employee.)
Latortue, placed in power by the U.S., had, like the president of Afghanistan, spent many years in the U.S. and was brought back to serve the U.S. in Haiti.
The so-called interim government he leads “did not win an ‘unfair’ election, because it was not elected at all. It completely failed any test of democratic legitimacy, having been installed by foreign powers.” (p. 65)
“During a pro-Lavalas demonstration on September 30, 2004, the HNP [Haitian National Police, trained by Canadians] fired into a crowd of some 10,000 protestors. Several unarmed demonstrators were killed or wounded under the watchful eye of UN peacekeepers.” (p. 79)
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Latin America, Roger Noriega, “explicitly called for the privatization of Haiti’s ports. The World bank also indicated that Haiti’s state run telecommunications company TELECO, should be privatized. A May 2005 World Bank report showed that Canada was overseeing the ‘decentralization’ and management of Haiti’s electrical system.” (p. 96)
What is not revealed in those quotations is the almost total devotion of the Canadian press and media to “disinformation” about Canada’s role in Haiti. For instance, almost no Canadians reading this know that Caricom, the organization of the Caribbean group of governments: the Caribbean Community, has refused under severe pressure to recognize the post-coup government imposed by the U.S., Canada, and France.
Canadians may forget, too, that when U.S. forces were kidnapping Jean- Bertrand Aristide in order to fly him into (darkest) Africa – not to the U.S . or Canada – Canadian troops “secured” the Haitian airport so that Aristide could be whisked out of the country without incident. Aristide has repeatedly insisted he did not go willingly and did not go to prevent instability.
How did that happen?
So-called insurgents began a war to take over Haiti. They were almost without exception created or fully backed by foreign governments. Paul Martin’s government refused peace-keepers to assist the legitimate government quell insurgency. Caricom called upon the UN Security Council – which refused to help.
The legitimate government of Haiti was beginning to turn the tide on the so-called insurgents, at Port-au-Prince, hoping for Venezuelan support.
Then everything changed.
On February 29, 2004, U.S. forces kidnapped Jean-Bertrand Aristide and his security staff and flew them to the Central African Republic. As I have said, Canadian forces seized the airport so that the U.S. kidnapping could proceed unchallenged.
When the decisions to remove Aristide, to install a puppet regime, and to dismantle Lavalas organizations and murder their members were taken – then, and only then, did some Canadian military arrive in Haiti. Then, and only then, were all the embargoes lifted and forms of financial support restored.
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan refused to investigate Aristide’s kidnapping and removal. Haiti is too small to risk angering the big powers who are looting it.
Haiti has suffered every violation by what are, in fact, invaders who have created fake social reconstruction, fake paramilitaries brutalizing the population, economic embargo, coup d’etat, and an almost unbelievable campaign of lies – that last totally embraced by the federal government of Canada and the larger portion of Canada’s press and media.
The case Engler and Fenton make is chilling. Canada is in Haiti as a barbaric invader, complicit with murder, torture, and repressive destruction of Haitian society and economic structure. Canadians should get the book, Canada in Haiti – and then begin, by every means possible, confronting Canadian government in order to force it out of its murderous policy and to force it out of Haiti.
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 19, 2005]
Really, how different is Paul Martin than Bush? Other than being more sneaky... They are both run by and for the corporations.
<br />
Oct. 20 will be the birthday of Tommy Douglas. We should aspire to build the kind of world Mr Douglas wanted.
Bad Gateway
The following error occurred:
The host name was not found during the DNS lookup. Contact your system administrator if the problem is not found by retrying the URL.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please contact the administrator
---
"The cost to the good people for their indifference to their public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." - Plato
I don't make jokes. I just watch the governmen
<br />
Someone suggested that it was so sweatshop corporations wouldn't endure upping the minimum wage, so they called in the US to remove the pres. I can't find a single corporation that manufactures anything in Hati. I have never seen a "made in Hati" stamp on squat. That arguement doesn't ring with any truth. Conjecture and hyperbole. <br />
<br />
Another arguement was that the coup was staged since Aristide resisted privitization of the ports and hydro systems. Yep, those big bad American corporations just couldn't wait to sink their teeth into the veritable wealth of Hati. How on earth could anyone make a cent in Hati? It wouldn't surprise me if they couln't privatize since nobody wanted it. Even if you could build something there, who are you going to charge? And how would you ever expect them to pay? <br />
<br />
The article (and I have to admit that I have not read the book, but I intend to do so) scoffs at $100,000 for aid for a supposed massacre in Scierie - saying that the massacre never happened. First, $100K can barely pay for the clerks salaries to administer $100K. What do they think this money went to? Second, I sugggest that the author and his readers look up some details. The link below contradicts the official death toll of 50+, but provides the names of the people who died at the hands of the pro-Aristide militias. I haven't spent any time trying to validate these findings, but they ring with more truth than anything else I could find.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.haitipolicy.org/content/2938.htm">http://www.haitipolicy.org/content/2938.htm</a><br />
<br />
There is some vague references in the following articles as well (not as well researched):<br />
<a href="http://www.nchrhaiti.org/article.php3?id_article=150">http://www.nchrhaiti.org/article.php3?id_article=150</a><br />
<a href="http://grassrootsonline.org/weblog/esperance0404.html">http://grassrootsonline.org/weblog/esperance0404.html</a><br />
<br />
And of course there are articles also drawing suspicion on whether the massacre happened at all (most of these expressing support for Aristide's PM Neptune):<br />
<a href="http://americas.org/item_19388">http://americas.org/item_19388</a><br />
<a href="http://www.canadahaitiaction.ca/article.php?id=85">http://www.canadahaitiaction.ca/article.php?id=85</a><br />
<br />
The way some of you carry on, it was like Aristide was the second coming of Chavez. He is no better than Mugabe, just not as well entrenched and is facing off against more militant opposition. He was a thug, a murderer, and evidently your favorite tin pot despot. Unlike Chavez (and more like Mugabe), he fixed elections. It's not hard to win an election and be the "duly elected leader" when you can ensure your victory.<br />
<br />
This is not to say that we are not culpable in his ouster. The Hatian people have certainly not been better off since he was deposed (there has not been much change for better or worse). And that indicates the true failure. Though the Brazilians are providing the bulk of the UN troops, we should be doing much more. But to think that we are doing this for some expansion of the US corporate empire is a bit of a stretch. If there were machivellian reasons for keeping Hati the hell on earth that it is, it would only to be to ensure that the Hatians stay where they are and starve quietly. And if that was the intent, we are doing a poor job of it.
from the neoliberal agenda what message does that send to the rest of the
Americas?
Second, Montreal-based Gildan Activewear has a multi-million dollar
presence in Haiti. They make T-shirts. It is their lowest cost production unit.
At least two Canadian mining companies have substantial claims in Haiti.
And SNC Lavalin from Montreal has tens of millions in contracts in Haiti.
To say the country is poor so why would big capitalists care is completely
wrong and ignores history. What do Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador and
Haiti all have in common? They are four of he five poorest countries in the
hemisphere and all have seen U.S. military coups/occupations/destablization
campaigns etc.
And the other of the five poorest countries? I've been to Bolivia twice in the
last five years and drank in a bar with U.S. soldiers in the country to
"eradicate drugs". The U.S. embassy is always a player in deciding who gets to
govern the country.
The sad truth is that bully countries are like bully people. They prey on
weakness. They make the weak weaker. They make the poor poorer. All for
their narrow self interest, whether that means a profit of one miliion, one
hundred million or one billion.
B. Stringer
From London Ontario
-----------------------
May be you're unfamiliar with the scenario on planet earth, hence your rather disingenious puzzlement.
Let me enlighten you. It's about ELIMINATING THE DANGER OF A GOOD EXAMPLE; a danger that is easily eradicated in a virtually defenseless country like Haiti and perfectly congruent with the U.S. policy of endless war on a world apparently inhabited by overwhelmingly poor but "very malicious terrorists". Candian politicians simply tag along on big brother's coattails.
BTW, Haitian sweatshops have been the exclusive producers of North America's baseballs. I forgot now which corporation it is who's tormenting its workers there, not to mention ripping them off.
-----------------------------
"Someone suggested that it was so sweatshop corporations wouldn't endure upping the minimum wage, so they called in the US to remove the pres. I can't find a single corporation that manufactures anything in Hati."
----------------------------
Of course you won't find any if you disdain looking for them.
----------------------------
"I have never seen a "made in Hati" stamp on squat. That arguement doesn't ring with any truth. Conjecture and hyperbole."
----------------------------
As if any "made in..." label had any meaning these days. Who would prevent a U.S. corporation to label it as made in the USA? The law??? Apparently the U.S. considers Haiti its eminent domain.
Your above is clearly showing the effects of official pronouncments on their assiduous students.
----------------------------
"Another arguement was that the coup was staged since Aristide resisted privitization of the ports and hydro systems. Yep, those big bad American corporations just couldn't wait to sink their teeth into the veritable wealth of Hati. How on earth could anyone make a cent in Hati? It wouldn't surprise me if they couln't privatize since nobody wanted it. Even if you could build something there, who are you going to charge? And how would you ever expect them to pay?"
-----------------------------
In other words, international (not to mention hemisperic) U.S. policy is a giant mystery to you, while obvious to most of us misguided socialists.
Perhaps Robin would appear more spot on, in your eyes, if he were obsessed with the profit motive beyond all other considerations.
-----------------------------
"The article (and I have to admit that I have not read the book, but I intend to do so) scoffs at $100,000 for aid for a supposed massacre in Scierie - saying that the massacre never happened. First, $100K can barely pay for the clerks salaries to administer $100K. What do they think this money went to?"
------------------------------
Those $100,000.- can provide a sumptuous living for 100 clerks in Haiti for a year. That a $100,000.- (just from Canada, and who knows how much from whom else) suffice in Haiti is an indication of just how cheap murder, not to mention a human life, has become there.
------------------------------
"Second, I sugggest that the author and his readers look up some details. The link below contradicts the official death toll of 50+, but provides the names of the people who died at the hands of the pro-Aristide militias. I haven't spent any time trying to validate these findings, but they ring with more truth than anything else I could find.
------------------------------
Not the official, but the "alleged" death toll from unofficial sources trying to revise the official version with facts.
What the official versions contradict, and why, is the whole point of Robin's article. Perhaps you didn't notice? Official propaganda wouldn't be worth diddly squat if it didn't ring like truth or were so transparent that even you would recognize its deceitfulness.
------------------------------
"The way some of you carry on, it was like Aristide was the second coming of Chavez. He is no better than Mugabe, just not as well entrenched and is facing off against more militant opposition. He was a thug, a murderer, and evidently your favorite tin pot despot. Unlike Chavez (and more like Mugabe), he fixed elections. It's not hard to win an election and be the "duly elected leader" when you can ensure your victory."
------------------------------
Is your somewhat contradictory and confused judgement here based on facts or merely on your diligent study of official versions, ringing with truth?
While you don't know much about the Haitian situation, but imply to have exhaustively researched the personal histories of Aristide, Mugabe and Chavez, I take it then, that they are all the same to you...useless, in terms of profit, and murderous because the "truthful experts" say so.
------------------------------
"This is not to say that we are not culpable in his ouster. The Hatian people have certainly not been better off since he was deposed (there has not been much change for better or worse). And that indicates the true failure. Though the Brazilians are providing the bulk of the UN troops, we should be doing much more. But to think that we are doing this for some expansion of the US corporate empire is a bit of a stretch. If there were machivellian reasons for keeping Hati the hell on earth that it is, it would only to be to ensure that the Hatians stay where they are and starve quietly. And if that was the intent, we are doing a poor job of it."
------------------------------
So much for the official version as perceived by a confident cosmopolitical genius.
Hans Krampe
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It has been most fustrating to try and figure out what the hell Canada has been up to in Haiti when no one in the government will answer any questions put to them.
And good post Anon, Oct. 19, 12:29pm
---
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche
for fair labour negotiations ...
and with the B.C. Supreme Court used to
threaten and frighten people,
the stark example of poor little Haiti is a lesson
to everyone who cares about decent employment
and working conditions.
without our consent the latest issue of "Press for convergence" from COAT <br />
has about the best information to date that I have seen on our participation in <br />
the illegal coup against Aristide.<br />
<br />
Bastards!<br />
<br />
A Very Canadian Coup d’état in Haiti:<br />
The Top 10 Ways that Canada’s Government<br />
Helped the 2004 Coup and its Reign of Terror<br />
<br />
<a href="http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/60/60.htm">http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/60/60.htm</a><br />
<p>---<br>"The most sustainable product is the one you never bought in the first place."<br />
Alex Steffan