The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:
“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)
Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as "the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the EU in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the EU. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:
“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”
How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered and incarcerated by communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin -- and that more than 10 million died before Stalin's death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]
Do we really believe the communists have changed or gone away?
United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.
One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “…If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the UN back doing something useful. …Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).
Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?
Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?
For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.
However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution” on which Hignite received a grade of 99 – “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of communistic regional government!
Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is “If you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”
Uneducated Americans will also ask you:
“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);
“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”;
“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”;
“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach ‘absolute’ morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”;
“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”;
“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”;
“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”
“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”;
“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”;
“What’s wrong with putting the UN’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.com and type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)
“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”;
“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”;
“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”;
“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”;
“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.
And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more “What’s Wrong With?” questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.
How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With” section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed… a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.
Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials’ malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor’s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her “too-hot” coffee at a McDonald’s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?
Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don't want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less “communism.” The Insiders know that “communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.
The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ “human resources”, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.
One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate communists and our government have been supporting the communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.com for full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR.”
Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face--forever...and remember, that is forever."
Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the "C" word to your vocabulary and use it often.
www.deliberatedumbingdown.com
© 2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt - All Rights Reserved
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 5, 2007]
Note: “Walks Like a Duck, Tal...
[Read]
americandeception.com
www.deliberatedumbingdo...
The weapons of oppression may be different, but I've been writing for 20 odd years that the destruction of democracy and locally based, ground up, self sufficient economic systems, will lead to corporate dictatorship and we have it now under the NAFTA and the TILMA, negotiated and signed in secret, between BC and Alberta.
The corporate boardrooms of major corporations are the same as the Soviet politbureau system of ideologically pure gangs making decisions over the lives of millions, while calling it "freedom" and "democracy".
Ed Deak. Big Lake, BC.
Economists may be able to point in a direction, eg. lower prices will increase sales, or vice versa.
But to place hard numerical values on their decisions, the way an engineer must do for example, defies the ability of the most able economist.
They may talk about price elasticity, etc. But, unlike an engineer, cannot guarantee their answers. It's, what we used to call, a 'science' were the answers were a matter of opinion and the vigour of the hand waving. And these people get paid big bucks for doing this voodoo 'science', one that'll make the working person much poorer before too long.
H.F. Wolff
One should consider who initially funded communism in the first place.
When you dig below the surface you'll find out it's the same pack of vermin who have been after absolute power for centuries: the global elites.
Follow the money, it never lies.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
"Neoclassical economics are the science for the alchemic conversion of silk purses into sows' ears"
Never had any reason to change this in 22 years, and if anything, things are getting worse.
Ed Deak
As for Cuba they have a far superior, health care and educational system than the United States and no starving people nor citizens without health care.
Nobody ever had to build walls to keep Americans in their own country. How many Americans have defected to a Marxist state?
If you gave even the poorest Americans a choice between living in the US and in Cuba, I bet very few would pick Cuba. Now imagine asking the average Cuban if he would give up communism to live in America. I suspect you'd get a hell of lot more takers there.
I bet even Ed Deak would choose America any day over any of the communist regimes he lived under.
Pierre Trudeau was an admirer of Marxist dictatorships, but then again, he never actually had to live under one.
Mr. (Mrs.) Individualist?
1) They will have their "wall" soon enough.
2) Marxist State: State owns everything.
Fascist State: Business owns everything, is also the government. The state IS business, business is the state.
No difference at all in operational effect. Both suck.
"If you gave even the poorest Americans a choice between living in the US and in Cuba, I bet very few would pick Cuba."
That would probably depend on where they are in the economic hierarchy. I seriously doubt that the poor, the hungry, the disenfranchised, and the homeless would mind it too much.
"Now imagine asking the average Cuban if he would give up communism to live in America."
Now imagine your shock if they REFUSED.
"I suspect you'd get a hell of lot more takers there."
Maybe, maybe not. What you said is an opinion. Opinions do not need to be verified by facts, so your guess is a good as anyone's.
"I bet even Ed Deak would choose America any day over any of the communist regimes he lived under."
Why don't you ask him?
"Pierre Trudeau was an admirer of Marxist dictatorships, but then again, he never actually had to live under one."
No, we're just creeping along towards a fascist dictatorship, which as I stated earlier in this post sucks just as bad.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush
Why don't you ask him?
He's free to refute me. I do however have a question for Mr. Zero Sum, and it's relevant to this discussion. If wealth is only about digging stuff up and burning it, then how come the Soviet Union, which was blessed with abundant natural resources, a fully nationalized industrial economy and satellite states that served as captive markets for goods was not as wealthy as the US? It was largely that inability to generate wealth at the same pace as the US that cost it the Cold War.
No, we're just creeping along towards a fascist dictatorship, which as I stated earlier in this post sucks just as bad.
This "creeping along" business reminds me too much of "the slippery slope" argument for my taste. Calling the US a fascist state is at best an extreme exaggeration, and at worst a lie. As a libertarian, I'm anti-fascist as well as anti-communist, but the anti-fascist beat is well patrolled on Vive. But the poster I was responding to was defending Marxist-Leninist totalitarianism. And I bet I'm the only one on here who's going to take him to task for that.
You'd lose that bet!
But I just don't feel like replying to every uninformed opinion that appears here or elsewhere.
H.F. Wolff
Agreed except for that bit about free speech.
Which we don't have in Canada or western Europe. And is presently under serious attack in the USA.
Don't believe me?
Try the following:
Send a letter to the newspaper or TV networks questioning the unconditional support of Israel in its oppression of the Palestinians.
Ditto for questions regarding the religious zeal of holocaustians.
(It helps if you are independently wealthy because you would, at least, lose your job if you were to pursue these questions with vigour).
"To determine the REAL power behind the throne ask whom you may not criticise".
H.F. Wolff
Why don't you ask him?
He's free to refute me."
So, in short, you're afraid to do so directly and have resorted to indirect questioning.
"This "creeping along" business reminds me too much of "the slippery slope" argument for my taste."
So, reality is now a "matter of taste"?
Then you've never worked anywhere that projects expanded far beyond the boundaries of their original mission, a phenomenon referred to as "project creep".
It is called that because it is slow, incremental, and so gradual it is generally not noticed until a review of the project's current scope is done and compared to the initial project mission.
Do the same to the United States: compare it now to what it was originally intended to be by the Founding Fathers.
Then tell me I'm wrong.
If you cannot see the obvious, then you are not a true "individualist", only a sheep content to wallow in their own blindness and ignorance; and as such, debate and reason with you would be useless.
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush