Conservative Party To Call For Closer Ties With U.S

Posted on Friday, June 04 at 10:29 by KevinGagnon

A version of the Conservative platform, which is to be released on Saturday, states that Canada should "enhance our NAFTA relationship with the United States."

It specifies that the two countries should pursue common trading rules, going beyond tariff elimination under Canada-U.S. free trade. Such measures would essentially prepare for a customs union: a North American trading bloc with the rest of the world.

The document goes further, stating that closer ties with Washington should also include "enhanced common labour, environmental and security standards."

This would put Canada well on the way to much closer integration with Washington, trade experts suggested yesterday, and would mirror some steps taken in Europe in recent decades (although a common currency is not mentioned).

"It's gutsy, that's for sure," said Michael Hart, a professor at Carleton University. "I'd also argue that it is responsive to the challenges facing the Canadian economy."

But it may bring sharp ripostes from the Liberal Party and the NDP.

Liberal Leader Paul Martin has accused the Conservatives of wanting to mimic U.S. policy in areas such as taxation and international relations, causing some concern in Washington about his bilateral intentions. The Conservative platform, although it never actually uses the term "customs union," may well give Mr. Martin more ammunition in what could amount to a mini-replay of the 1988 free-trade election campaign.

Conservatives emphasized, however, that some Liberals advocate the steps they are suggesting.

MP Scott Brison, now the Liberal parliamentary secretary for Canada-U.S. relations, suggested something similar when he ran for the leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party last year. His viewpoint didn't change after he switched to the Liberals. But Mr. Martin, despite speaking repeatedly about the need to improve Canada-U.S. relations, has apparently not accepted an agenda of deeper economic relations.

"There's some general stuff [in the Liberal platform] but its nebulous," Mr. Brison acknowledged. "It is a hard initiative to put on a bumper sticker."

The Liberal foreign-policy platform to be released today is expected to focus on three broad themes: peace and nation-building; strengthening military preparedness and fighting the global AIDS pandemic.

A customs union entails a level of economic integration beyond what is involved in a free-trade agreement such as the trilateral NAFTA.

Free-trade pacts eliminate tariffs between countries, but allow them to pursue unco-ordinated trade policies with the rest of the world. Almost all tariffs between Canada and the United States were eliminated within 10 years of the 1988 free-trade pact.

A customs union builds on free trade through the co-ordination of policy on trade with the rest of the world. Tariffs imposed on worldwide imports into the trading bloc are harmonized over time.

This eliminates the need for so-called rules of origin, which set out how much of a good must be produced domestically to qualify for duty-free trade. Essentially, all products -- those produced inside the trade zone and those imported from outside -- circulate freely.

The core countries of what is now the European Union took this step in 1957.

The primary benefit for a country such as Canada, trade experts say, would be to simplify border enforcement. Studies have found that these procedures can cost as much as 3 per cent of gross domestic product. This translates into billions of dollars, particularly since the Canadian economy exports to the United States roughly one-third of everything it produces.

Canada and the United States already impose similar tariffs on most products from abroad, though there also are some significant differences.

The drawback for Canada, experts say, is that a customs union would likely make it more difficult to pursue an independent trade policy with those countries where Canadian and U.S. policies diverge -- such as Cuba.

The federal bureaucracy has been studying the impact of a Canada-U.S. customs union for some time. A recent roundtable organized by the Policy Research Initiative -- essentially the federal government's internal think tank -- concludes that negotiation of a full customs union might not be practicable immediately, but that steps toward this end would likely make economic sense.

The leaked Conservative platform also calls for the Canadian ambassador to Washington to have cabinet status, and argues that anti-American comments from some Liberals last year have complicated resolution of cross-border disputes such as softwood lumber.

"The Canadian government must learn to disagree without being disagreeable," it states, paraphrasing a comment coined by John Manley, the Liberal cabinet minister who quarterbacked bilateral relations after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

***********************************************

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Jun 04, 2004 7:03 pm
    It's about time we had closer economic ties with the States. Trade disputes are a waste of time and money. An integrated economy would mean that a single congressman wouldn't be able to hold an entire Canadian industry hostage to his demands. Our trucks wouldn't get stuck at the border wasting time and money. But best of all - Canadian politicians couldn't arbitrarily screw around with Canadians who are trying to make a living.

  2. Fri Jun 04, 2004 7:22 pm
    How short-sighted!

    further integration means less sovereignty for Canadians and even less democratic oversight. Anyone who thinks America will bend their ear to Canada over trade issues is living in a fantasy world.

    say goodbye to whatever few Canadian companies that still exist. Say goodbye to our energy security.

    Say goodbye to Canada and HELLO GREENCARD!

  3. by avatar Milton
    Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:00 pm
    Yea sure, Lets become <b><i>Puerto Rico North</i></b>. This is what you'll get if you vote for the Liberals or Conservatives. <p>I think all those planning to vote Liberal or Conservative should <b>swallow their pride</b> and <b>vote for the NDP</b> instead.

  4. Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:20 am
    Manley Sucks !!



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  5. Sat Jun 05, 2004 1:34 am
    What does Manley suck?

    hee hee hee

  6. Sat Jun 05, 2004 5:01 am
    Anon at the top, you are right after we are further integrated with the U.S. it won't be our Canadian politicians screwing over the poor sap trying to make a living, it'll be the U.S. politicians and if you think you got it bad now, try earning a living at the wages of Mexico, and pay your own healthcare!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  7. by avatar Jesse
    Sat Jun 05, 2004 6:35 pm
    Jim, please try to be constructive here. I deleted one of your comments where you suggested the anon poster needed therapy. That's not cool; we *want* to hear opposing viewpoints. If someone says something you disagree with, argue their points without resorting to ad hominems.

    ---
    Jesse

  8. Sat Jun 05, 2004 7:33 pm
    Don`t you believe in free speech, jvanherk? Sounds like you can`t handle your new found power. Susan didn`t have any problems with the majority of us regulars. You practically insinuated that I was a NUT (sorry) because of the way I emphasize things. Should you be deleted for that? Of course not. As long as people aren`t overly vulgar or insulting, I say let people express themselves.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  9. Sat Jun 05, 2004 8:12 pm
    Manley is not cool.



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  10. Sat Jun 05, 2004 8:16 pm
    Yeah, he`s sooo not gellin`

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  11. Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:44 am
    "Canadian politicians couldn't arbitrarily screw around with Canadians who are trying to make a living."

    Yer right! We'd be getting diddled by American politicians!

  12. Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:48 am
    Seems those in favour (er, favor) of closer ties with US can ONLY put up a money arguement. And they pre-suppose we'll be some sort of 51st state, and have voting rights and all that.

  13. by avatar Jesse
    Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:57 am
    Dave, I believe in free speech. However, I also believe that you need to have something worth saying before that comes into effect. If you use your free speech only to call people names and spout rhetoric, then there's really no point.

    ---
    Jesse

  14. Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:34 pm
    Yes, we will keep our CPP, our healthcare, our right to vote...

    Dream on !



    ---
    "Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news